ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626
And you can do the same thing for Steve Jobs
I'd be happy to! I hate Apple and all it's products! They did invent nothing, all their products are hype, and people willing to pay a premium to look high-status. If someone tried to paint Jobs as a once-in-a-century innovator I'd be on their ass too. But the difference between Jobs and Musk is that Jobs company is sustainable in a way that Musk's will prove not to be. I think he also tended to deliver the products he announced, but I can't say I followed him very closely.
Musk's product range from working-I-suppose-but-wildly-overhyped to "I am confident we will have working in two years (or two years more... or two years more... or two years more...) .
I haven't paid any attention to the financials, so maybe it's all going to come crashing down
And likewise I might very well be wrong, and Musk is going to change the world, but I'm worried about a lot of contrarians I sympathize with staking their reputation on him.
Afghanistan is a barely functional tribal warzone with a life expectancy a decade lower than the US.
Above replacement fertility beats life expectancy any day of the week.
The thing is, if it's not the case, we have to consider that SpaceX is putting down more launches than the rest of the market put together as some sort of stunt or fraud, which starts to edge into conspiracy theory.
Not if you realize the overwhelming majority of those launches are for Starlink, than it becomes a straight-forward application of using hype to generate more hype to extract as much money from investors as possible.
Either Musk is a machiavellian genius running a massive misinformation campaign using billion dollars of hardware
I unironically believe that this is closer to the truth than the alternative, and that we'll see it soon enough (I'll go with Thunderf00t's 5 year clock, starting last year, though like I said the vibes are telling me it might happen a lot sooner).
In case it isn't obvious, I did literally just say that both men and women should have obligations to the larger group they belong to, and only imposing obligations on one side is, indeed, a raw deal. I'm not seeing how that implies men's ownership of women, though.
It’s not about a little bit of land in the northeast of Ukraine. It’s the entire country.
I thought they wanted half, and that they periodically send messages through unofficial channels that they'd be ok with NATO rolling into the other half?
This is silly. His argument is obvious - you did it first, so they can now do it too. You can't dismiss it with a simple "nuh-uh".
Also, there are no reliable people on these matters, because everyone just pushes their interest.
We're talking about the media conveniently ignoring things that are already on public record, and go against the prevailing narrative. What America and Germany say, or don't say to each other is not relevant to the question.
Correct, that definitely does not count as “my life sucks” in anywhere near the same way as Oliver Anthony style “I’m personally oppressed and downtrodden, and it’s my outgroup’s fault” populism.
I wish I knew who the hell that was. Anyway, since we agree it's not about Trump, looks like w agree OP's thesis can be dismissed.
I don’t think so. I think there’s an important qualitative difference between populist “rage and vengeance” grievance on the one hand — which is what the OP is attributing to Anglophone conservatism — and the technocratic/futurist “we’ve identified the problems, and it’s time to let smart and successful elites determine how to fix those problems” institutionalism of the factions I identified.
How can I determine that this is, in fact, the case, rather than it being a Russell's conjugation?
What's even "the education system" in a notoriously poor and fractured country?
When you've pushed 2 trillion dollars into it? It's whatever you want it to be.
People are being dramatic, they periodically go down but come back up again after a while, I never had to rotate between more than 2.
I guess there's some arm's race between nitter and twitter. For a while it even looked like nitter won, and twitter won't be doing any more fuckery, but they must have changed something again.
Because even with all the issues, they're better than the alternative!
Sort of, but I'll take the L from natural selection, but I'm going to put up a fight if it comes from the deliberate action of another human.
Good cop, bad cop. Dorsey will have an easier job now.
Oh dear... Look, speaking plainly would result in going on a several paragraph long rant about the relationship of the common people to the people in power, it would be off-topic and didn't feel appropriate. And "boo outgroup" will be hard to avoid, when I essentially believe we are under hostile occupation.
Iran has been launching missiles at Israel,
Has Israel perhaps done something directly prior to these missile attacks?
engaged in near constant terrorism against Israel, and is engaged in a variety of forms of cyberwarfare with the US and Israel.
That's something everyone is engaged in all the time, and it's crazy to act like they're crossing some boundary that warrants a hot war.
Iran blockading the Strait of Hormuz is not rationally ensuring their survival. It makes regime change more pressing.
You already tried regime-changing them when they weren't blocking the strait! What do they have to lose at this point? Please, try having some theory of mind.
We don't do something, it's our fault.
Can you give an example of that?
Iran and they went on a nuclear rampage in 10 years, it would be our fault.
What if they don't go on a nuclear rampage, just use it as a deterrent the way North Korea does, and all your little intervention accomplishes is more refugees and higher gas prices?
Europe even want from us?
It would be nice if your president could follow the foreign policy that he campaigned on during the elections.
I am willing to entertain claims that official statistics are distorted, but nevertheless someone should make the point: real GDP per capita has more than doubled since 1980s and typewriters.
Distorted doesn't begin to describe it. It's not like someone made an oopsie when refording data in their excel spreadsheet.
Citing these statistics is makes no sense until we establish we're even using the same definitions. If the bureaucratic sector expands to match the gains brought by technology, that's still "P" for the GDP god, and does little to argue against someone who says they're not seeing much productivity gains over their lifetime.
"Hunting him down" would require an intent to kill him when he was posing no threat. The way they acted was extremely dumb, but their behavior does not match yours or MadMonzer's description.
EDIT: Apparently the new speaker believes both, so, heh, touché.
Strong evidence for "Republicans are deliberately throwing the election" theory, isn't it?
The rocket is ok, but I'm not sure I try their accounting. There was a leaked email from Elon about how they have to get Starship to orbit if they're to make any money, and I don't see that happening. Generally with Elon, there's a whole lot of hype, and not a whole lot of substance, so if the investor money dries up, his entire empire might come crashing down.
But I hope I'm wrong!
but those false beliefs were the expert consensus of their day and applied literally everywhere.
I honestly doubt that. The idea that bilingualism is somehow bad could be seen in the wild until pretty recently, but in my experience was limited to the Anglos, and might even have been mostly an American thing. Maintaining it requires a huge amount of anti-curiosity, and blindness to other parts of the world.
Experts hold false beliefs for non-malicious reasons all the time, eg face masks stop Covid.
Sure, once an idea gets rolled out from the top, it tends to get repeated in good faith by the lower strata of society. It seems that this is how Anglos have always done it.
Some time ago a bunch of people were complaining about how the revisionism threads are crowding out other conversation. My sympathy for them has just dropped below zero.
Hell, we're even fine w/ Russia not being part of the West. If it wants to be an authoritarian state treating it's people like crap, we honestly don't care that much.
I don't think that's true. *You* might not care that much, the people running various arms of official and unofficial foreign policy absolutely want to stick their nose in every country they don't control yet.
- Prev
- Next

So howcome I have never seen a "made in USA" label, and why is the local agribusiness periodically shiitting bricks at the prospect of dropping tariffs on food?
More options
Context Copy link