Avc87
1mo ago
Well it is a lot less bland than the other models but it is also much much worse.
His speeches belch forth like the crack of doom from a cracked kettle—each syllable a sour fizz of vinegar and vanity
He is a walking thundercloud of gout and gloom, forever clutching his cane as though it were a sceptre, forever waddling after imaginary crowns like a fat spaniel sniffing for rotten sausages.
Under his rule the eagle of liberty is plucked to a carrion crow, and the very air reeks with the sulphur of Alien decrees and Sedition fetters.
How is an eagle plucked into a crow? What is a crack of doom in a kettle? These sentences border on actual nonesense.
Avc87
1mo ago
I feel pretty vindicated. This is purple, corporate, bland and full of cliches, excessive adjectives and awkward imagery. It compares poorly to human texts specifically selected for being as dumb and vulgar as possible. It is not really a technical issue, some of the more ugly sentences will no doubt be improved by future models, what makes AI writing bad is the style.
Avc87
1mo ago
If anything this just shows how far standards have slipped, this is some very vivid imagery. I dont think any modern politican can reach this level, certainly no AI.
It is certainly nonesense in the context of the rest of the sentence. A politicans speech signifies the end of the world, and it comes from a cracked kettle and it is alike to "vinegar and vanity".
More options
Context Copy link