AvocadoPanic
No bio...
User ID: 550

You're just parroting the progressive line that more choices equal more freedom. When those choices lead to societal decay, it’s not freedom, it’s chaos. Your 'objective' view is just moral relativism dressed up as enlightenment.
When OR decriminalized drug use were the addicts freer? It seems they had fewer options as they were slaves to their addiction. They possibly have an additional choice, homeless addict living in a tent (this was an option before too), but far more choices are now unavailable to them, as we see how challenging it is to move on from homeless and drug abuse.
Did it make the larger society around them freer or do they too now have fewer places to be free of homesless addicts living in tents.
Individuals have alway had the 'freedom' to be lustful degenerates if they were willing to face the opprobrium that went with it.
The 'freedom' to indulge in degeneracy doesn’t just affect the individual, it poisons the well for everyone else. It’s like saying you’re free to pollute the air because it’s your right, never mind that it makes the atmosphere unbreathable for others.
Exactly. The conflation of license with liberty is the hallmark of a society that’s lost its moral compass. Freedom isn’t the absence of restraint; it’s the presence of virtue.
'Anything goes' has always been the rallying cry of those who want to tear down civilization. Tyrants and anarchists both love to twist language to suit their ends. Call it license or call it degeneracy, either way, it’s not freedom worth defending.
Even our 'friends' hate us, we just destroy them differently.
Perhaps we should try being less horrible.
In today’s world, degeneracy is liberation. It’s the same old doublespeak, just with a new coat of paint. Orwell would be proud, or horrified. Probably both.
Exactly.
We're not spending wisely. They'll hate us regardless. We should let the quarreling foreign tribes fight, and if we're going to dump money and weapons and 'intelligence' into the region it should be exclusively to Christian militias that they might retake the holy lands for Christendom.
Skepticism is healthy, but willful blindness to consequences is not. Every choice has ripple effects, and pretending otherwise is just wishful thinking. Society isn’t a collection of isolated individuals; it’s a web of interdependencies. Your slave analogy’s fun, but it doesn’t change the fact that unchecked lust screws us all in the end.
The freedom to speak your mind, even if it’s offensive. Just because you can say something doesn’t mean you should. Freedom without discernment is just noise. Degeneracy’s a better word when people treat liberty like a free-for-all buffet.
By that logic, the freedom to self-destruct is still freedom. Sure, but it’s not something to celebrate. It’s a symptom of a society that’s lost its way. Options don’t make you free if they’re just different flavors of ruin.
There hate for us is not unwarranted.
How strong is the evidence that this action will prevent them from getting nuclear weapons rather than convince them they absolutely need them and that we are duplicitous and not to be trusted?
freedom with responsibility?
It’s a nice sentiment, but it ignores the fact that most people can’t handle the responsibility. That’s why we have laws, traditions, and taboos. Without them, 'freedom' just becomes a euphemism for hedonism.
US claims to have an interest in non-proliferation and international order
Kayfabe.
But just as people who want to "end masculinity" and "end the gender binary" are not talking about literally exterminating males
It seems to me they are clear advocating for eliminating what many people would think of when they think of males. While they may be allowing for XY individuals to still 'exist' in some sense, it's likely it would be in the sense that a woman can have a cock, balls and beard. Those aren't women, and their new men, won't be men.
They are talking about eliminating males in a real sense. We do them and ourselves a disservice by not believing they are sincere in their advocacy especially when they show us time and again who they genuinely are and what they believe.
We're supplying the knives to some of the children.
As I said in another response, we should let the quarreling foreign tribes fight.
Then let's leave them to it, but stop paying for it or supporting it.
I would have liked him to know the population of Iran, and the approximate ethnic make-up of the population. I would have liked Tucker to follow up with a query to see if he knew the population of Israel.
I would have liked him to condemned Mossad intelligence operations carried out domesticly in the US. Call for increased efforts by FBI counter-intelligence. Especially in an interview just before Juneteenth, they day we celebrate the execution of the Rosenbergs, notorious Soviet spies.
They're the same picture.
Once your in these stores in the shitty area of town they ask to see your ID because offering pornography to minors is a crime.
Yes that may be a disaster for Israel. How exactly would that be a disaster for the USA?
Do you believe that Tim Waltz actually directed this man to kill state politicians to clear up seats for him to run for the Senate?
No, but also isn't that what a Keyser Söze or John List would want us to think.
Yes, won't someone please think of the poor MIC.
Funding this death and destruction for the pecuniary benefit of the MIC, makes it worse not better.
Are you equally concerned for the bankers who may suffer without this largesse?
How long am I driving? 20 minutes in the icechest isn't too long.
- Prev
- Next
Slavery to lust and degeneracy is not freedom.
More options
Context Copy link