@Blueberry's banner p

Blueberry


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 19:13:44 UTC

				

User ID: 90

Blueberry


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 19:13:44 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 90

Reasoning from fiction about the real world is a fallacy (imaginary map vs real territory?), and science fiction says more about the time it was created as the depicted future. Old scifi imagined any household chores done by robots, but they couldn't imagine that the washing machine freed women from being housewives and the coming waves of feminism. In 60s StarTrek they couldn't get female commanding officers as women in the test viewership hated the bossy actress, in 90s Star Trek there were no gay people (not to mention transgender), and Picard was bald. In a real future with Star Trek like tech everyone will have fantastic hair and some otherkin/wolfkin will use transporter tech to degenerate themselves to furry-hybrids. And the holodeck itself is a can of worms...

Someone on hacker news had for the last 20 years a specific problem in graph theory (Barnette's conjecture) and tried to understand the proof (and tried to translate it for non-math people) and was astonished that it used multiple esoteric "symbolic tricks borrowed from theoretical physics". He used Anthropics Fable to understand the OpenAI proof and first thought Fable was hallucinating techno-babble:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49988654

Forgive me for posting LLM output but I find this darkly hilarious:

"it's a matrix-tree cancellation wearing Kasteleyn's planar signs, run as a Witten index over Penrose-lineage states, evaluated as a fugacity-zero loop gas in an infinitesimal magnetic field — and the reason it reads like physics is that every one of those tools was built for partition functions"

I thought this was pure slop when I read it but there are some clear analogues in these other areas of physics, really neat computational tricks, and a very interesting paper by Penrose calculating Tait colorings I never knew about previously

So at least this proof (and at least to some guy on hn) this proof were not from the LLM digesting prior art papers on this problem or general graph theory, but from "the entire corpus of neat computational tricks that physicists derived to make their equations spit out something other than zero or infinity". Which makes it very unlikely a human could have thought of it, as few graph theorists are familiar with infinitesimal magnetic fields (and vice versa).

I just found this place on an idle lurk through /r/slatestarcodex. As far as I can tell, it's a surviving remnant of the more iconoclastic elements of the rationalist/postrat/lesswrong sphere

There is also the anagram offshoot datasecretslox:

https://www.datasecretslox.com/index.php

It looms more oldschool in the bboard aesthetic (which I like), but is a bit wider on topics.

Based on the multiple text messages

Is there a neutral source giving an overview? News articles only summarize it and social media is piece by piece.

Canada, intentionally exclude those as exculpatory evidence

I wouldn't have guessed that. With what explanation? Was there a recent case around that?

For some reason no 8 hours, they will deorbit early, so only another 30 minutes from now to coast in space.

I don't have strong opinions. But people think Tommy Robinson is a fascist, so DHH going on his march is guilty too.

https://brennan.day/normalized-fascism-in-open-source-12-million-given-to-dhh/

DHH also made a post equating Roma with growing wolve population in Denmark.

"When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them."

Metafilter is still kicking around? I googled the thread and was surprised about the many maskers still around. Though one notices:

Strangely, several of the very covid-cautious places I've frequented relaxed their mask policy because the vibe was that the most assiduous maskers were white middle class people and that requiring masks for all was alienating others.

At current (though quite high) market value that would be around $20 million per Greenlander.

Hm. You could argue a similar version about zoonosis.

Not only should the world force China with sanctions to forbid wet markets, the west should move away from poultry to prevent the next bird flu dangerous to humans. In fact to lower (eliminate!) risk of zoonosis we must embrace veganism! Instead I encounter that only as a minor talking point in vegan activism (if at all).

It is true though:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8319869/

The production, distribution and consumption of animal-based products (such as meat, dairy and eggs) is a major risk for zoonotic transmission. Therefore, our perspective is that promoting sustainability, particularly by reducing unsustainable animal-based consumption, must be part of the broader response to reduce the risk of future pandemics.

Instead people shrug. Eh, nothing to be done by Asians eating crazy animals. And vegans much rather want to talk about other stuff like ethics.

Crazy that Yud wrote them almost 20 years ago

Wait, this is the active yt channel of the last psychiatrist?

The house is literally on Zillow.

I wonder what the discount (premium?) on a murder house is.

But yes, the window to the lawn was her way for suicide? As a nurse she surely could have gotten something to inject or why not some old fashioned hanging.

Suppose demons exist. What is the catholic or orthodox stand regarding legal/moral responsibility for actions done when possessed by a demon? (Of course I am asking because of the current very prominent case of a mother being commanded by a voice for 18 minutes to murder, but the question can be generalized)

Btw he has a youtube channel:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=q1UfDHij5R4

And he isnt even the father!

The child is from his good looking trophy husband (who I presume nagged Spahn until he got his child wish fulfilled). „Cuckold“ is not used for homosexual pairings, but by definition this is for what Spahn sacrificed his political career.

What a lovely channel!

Seldomly on hacker news a woman is linked „look at this awesome womens youtube channel collecting miniature-clocks/explaining-soldering-electronics/extremely-male-nerd-hobby“ and it is always an old geezer who recently transitioned to a womens name.

current policy sprinkles benefits over time rather than concentrating it in the hands of the young who need it most

Benefits are opaque. How much does the colleague with four kids get with tax credits or child benefits for this and that program? No idea. Instead reverse the positions: tax and penalize having few children. Print on the tax return every year the extra malus one has to pay into social security. Make childless people fill out annoying and complicated forms to get a small tax return (while people with +3 children are getting them by default), instead of making families fill out forms to get benefits.

Also do DEI/affirmative action for people with children. The state should hire/promote for public servant positions the person with more children (would be counter to meritocratic idea, but the state is not trying to be efficient anyway). Let the intelligentsia compete for prestigious leadership positions/sinecures by having the bigger family first and education inflation second.

Here are English chants for comparison (league, not wc though):

https://youtube.com/watch?v=i81Khk7G2Hc

Other countries have not this disproportionate payout and still are lawful.

Both the US and Russia are nuclear powers.

The UAE is not enriching nuclear fuel domestically, but importing it from the US.

https://www.framatome.com/medias/framatome-and-enec-sign-nuclear-fuel-supply-agreement-to-diversify-and-strengthen-uae-clean-energy-security/

Indigenous youth make up 55% of those in youth detention despite being only 7% of the youth. Adults, despite being only 3% of the national population

That surprised me, I thought the population share was in the promille. Does that mean in a generation indigenous portion of youths will be in double digits?

So I wonder: Why did he phrase it like this?

Because he is a successful boomer man and it was tongue in cheek, because you can make every joke when deprecating yourself or “punching up”. (And of course it is assumed that the patriarchy rules).

The same reason 2 years ago the question “Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a man or a bear?” did go viral because most women chose the bear. Rephrased to “stuck with a bear or a black man?” yields the opposite answer though which reveals that this is conflict theory and not mistake theory.