I assume you’re a well-informed poster. You and I and everyone on this board surely knows well that ‘Free Palestine’ groups claim to be anti-colonialist, anti-racist and leftist, plus supporters of the concept of national liberation and also of BLM, for example. Their opposition to Israel’s policies rather obviously stem from this ideology and not from a general hatred of the Jewish people and not from a hard opposition towards the concept of a Jewish state in itself, as they view Israel as a white supremacist, unrepentant, aggressor settler state, and many of their members and supporters are themselves Jews. We can, of course, make all sorts of criticism of them, but this needs to be admitted. I guess we can go so far as to call them anti-white, since they see Israeli settlers and Zionists as white. At the same time, not only is their rhetoric not anti-Semitic, they do not tolerate anti-Semitism either, especially not within their own ranks.
Obviously these groups have existed before October 7th, in fact they have existed for a long time, and their ideological rhetoric against Israeli colonialism was also deployed against the US political system, which they view as structurally racist and neo-colonialist. Back when BLM was more relevant, it was the latter that was getting these activists more media attention, and I can only assume that this made many people forget that these groups are also anti-Zionist, and that accusations of anti-Semitism do not work against them at all, for the simple reason that they genuinely do not see themselves as anti-Semitic and thus do not consider themselves compelled to apologize. It’s similar to the case of the ‘Democrats are the real racists’ narrative, which does not work on Democrats one bit.
To the extent that US political opposition towards Zionism and the Zionist lobby exists outside the leftist, anti-racist, anti-colonialist milieu, I think it’s fair to say that it all stems from isolationism, to the extent that it still even exists. And the common attribute of isolationists is that they wish to isolate the US from other conflict regions in the world as well, not just Israel, so I don’t think accusations of anti-Semitism apply in their case either.
True. My argument is that economic autonomy permits women to select for attributes other than provider ability when looking for a mate. This may result in them indeed not settling at all, or selecting mates that are below them in socio-economic status but otherwise being exceptional in some way that makes them hypergamously attractive.
'Find me a real life story where an attractive woman with the option to pick between a handsome, reliable, but only moderately wealthy Blue Collar worker, and a high status millionaire minor celeb, and intentionally settled for the former.'
third wave feminism is, by and large, a reaction to the perception of male sexual threat
I’m no political theorist but as far as I know, one defining characteristic of 3rd wave feminism that differentiates it from the 2nd wave is sex positivity. So there’s either an obvious contradiction here or there is some weird-ass angle to all this that I fail to notice.
China is indeed not a place where famine, massive uprisings, civil war and regime collapse are unfathomable by any standards. The situation is probably more precarious than it seems from the outside.
Also a broke-ass wigger with two children from a former relationship with a black woman.
In a society where women are economically dependent on male provision on an individual basis in the context of monogamy, that is true. Otherwise it’s not necessarily the case.
The one-child policy resulted in a huge gender imbalance.
I'm surprised that the quoted parts of the article did not mention this. It's arguably the single biggest factor in this whole phenomenon.
Do you think Liu Yifei or Fan Bingbing would be pursued by someone like you? You wouldn’t pursue them, because you know those beauties wouldn’t be interested in you.
I decided to do a bit of research for purely scientific purposes. According to Wikipedia, I can report that both of those women are single and childless. So is Ma Nuo, by the way. According to this article, she delayed marriage until the age of 35 when she, supposedly due to social pressure only, entered a disastrous and abusive relationship. At the time of that article, divorce proceedings were still pending.
I think all this is relevant to the subject matter at hand, and can be easily explained by Red Pill theories.
a pre installed web browser that force enables a vibe coded extension.
Can you please explain what this even is?
They just won't let you program YouTube to say "only show and allow this kid this piano guy's channel", nothing else
True. One would assume that this should be possible in a mobile app.
It’s not like I want to reinvent the wheel or something, but wouldn’t it be possible to design tablets and smartphones specifically for children, just as there are crappy mobile phones designed for old people, with a some sort of built-in set of restrictions regarding apps? With all the enthusiastic narratives regarding the digital revolution and whatnot, one would think that this is feasible.
Either way, I'm sure 90% of those 36 million would have died within like 3 years anyway due to pre-existing illnesses.
But this isn't what happened during the lockdowns. The entire population was subjected to them.
Fair enough, but that's not the angle I had in mind. I have cursory knowledge of the usual accusations leveled against Ford regarding his Nazi ties: getting a German award, his portrait supposedly being displayed on Hitler's desk and similar things of, you know, just enormous magnitude. Compared to these, the Soviet ties of Ford Motor are one a whole different level, and that connection started before Hitler even came to power. And yet down the memory hole it goes. No mention of it anywhere.
Relative to what Ukraine needs.
It'd be hard to argue against that.
It's funny how everyone conveniently forgets that Ford had much more extensive business dealings with Stalin than with Hitler. It was due to Ford that there was a truck industry in the USSR in the first place.
Quarantine has been an effective measure to mitigate infectious disease outbreaks for nearly a thousand years (and before modern medicine, the only available tool).
Quarantines were enacted to isolate only those who were confirmed to be infected. Let's not misinterpret clear definitions.
They were initially told the measures will be temporary so as to flatten the curve, in other words they were justified by the logical-sounding reasoning that the epidemic will spread through the whole of society anyway, and it needs to be ensured that health services do not get overwhelmed. It was also claimed that this will take no more than two or so weeks.
I remember the time between autumn 2021 and the beginning of the Ukrainian War. It did seem like the status quo stabilized and we’re in a new normal. Those who refused to get vaccinated were going to live as pariahs, modern untouchables, not permitted to travel, to fly with airlines, check into hotels etc. and those who were vaccinated were going to need to have their certificate of it on them.
I reckon reading that huge numbers of Indian peasants, then penniless urban seasonal workers, starved to death and died as they tried in vain to go back to their villages on foot, hoping to get home before the government locked down all travel as well.
Noted.
Anyway, since I replied to only one half of a sentence, I think it makes sense to reply in a bit more detail: what I described would have readily been available to Ukrainian nationalists (at least before 2014) without firing a single shot or wasting even 1$ of US aid. When weighing past options, I think we need to take this into account.
I imagine it's one thing to be married as a woman to a man you're not sexually attracted to, but it's entirely something else to be married to one who is not, and is incapable of being sexually attracted to you. I'm guessing most women would opt to remain single than to sign up for the latter.
Straight men do chase lesbians too, and even more gay men have a thing for trying to "convert" straight men.
For/Into marriage? With children? Because this is what OP was describing.
One of the things I noticed when trawling reddit was absolute lack of sympathy from anyone.
Not even from his native Ukraine? Which he donated large sums to during the war?
Either way, I think any modern society is well-advised to at least try drawing lines in the sand and establish clear rules regarding all the gooners, simps, e-thots, porners, "incels" and whores in its midst. We can all go on pretending that these seismic social changes have not actually happened, but what good does that do us? We need to acknowledge a bunch of unpleasant facts: enormous segments of both men and women will never marry and never breed. Calhoun's mice/rat utopia experiment has been put into practice in the human world. Not only is the Christian patriarchy dead; anyone who has ever had even indirect social experience of it is already dead. Should it ever return, it will definitely not be Christian. We need to decide what our attitudes should be towards women whose sole aim in life is to whore themselves out, and towards the faceless mass of males financing them.

Do 3rd wave feminists unironically advocate for women to initiate all male-female pairings?
More options
Context Copy link