@Botond173's banner p

Botond173


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 06:37:06 UTC

				

User ID: 473

Botond173


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 06:37:06 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 473

It's probably no coincidence that the three groups of women with the general reputation of being down for performative/desire sex are young women (so not yet interested in long-term commitment), recently divorced women (done with the whole concept of long-term commitment, at least for the time being) and cougars (who basically left the mating/relationship marketplace altogether).

Isn't the whole point of the existence of sororities to insert themselves in situations such as this?

It makes sense. Women obviously have no innate conception of the effect of T on the sex drive and what it can compel them to do.

Are you sure about this? A 20-yr-old was 11 years old when the MeToo campaign started.

It seems to be that OP is referring to an unwritten/unstated social rule so asking for publicly available evidence probably isn't warranted here.

At least among the subset of women willing to engage in group sex in the first place, is it safe to assume most will regret it?

Probably yes.

I would expect that the vast majority of these sorts of encounters end with all parties going their separate ways having gotten more-or-less what they wanted out of it.

I guess I'm beating a dead horse of my own at his point but everyone involved here belonged to the same small social circle on campus. Going their separate ways wasn't a realistic option. It was also unrealistic to expect that the men involved will all go on to conspire to carefully conceal the incident from all other women in the same social circle.

I recall this being a specific argument of the Youtuber The Jolly Heretic.

Makes sense.

In this telling, it's very much a "is there anyone you forgot to ask" situation, where third parties are inserting themselves into something that they have no business inserting themselves into.

Well sorry but no. A queen bee who's heading a sorority presumably with high status on campus has an evident interest in preventing that sorority from gaining the reputation of being associated with crazy sluts.

Don't you think that there is too high a bar for this level of conspiracy and coordination in this particular social setting?

"we're shutting down whatever the fuck this is" part

Another commenter noted that she's supposedly a jacked female bodybuilder. If this is the case I'm guessing the dude who shut it all down did so partially because he was just weirded out by the spectacle.

it was the men who were not taking responsibility for their choices

The responsibility to do...what? Other commenters here have pointed out that the disinvitation to the Halloween party obviously seems to originate from the sorority queen bee. Were they responsible to defy her in this?

So to spell it out, in your view it was the unmet specific obligation of the fratboys involved to carefully conceal the incident from a) the sorority queen bee and her minions b) clueless male students of the same college whom the woman in question sees as potential future boyfriends/husbands.