BurdensomeCount
Thou Shalt Read BC's Writings!
The neighborhood of Hampstead is just at present exercised with a series of events which seem to run on lines parallel to those of what was known to the writers of headlines and "The Kensington Horror," or "The Stabbing Woman," or "The Woman in Black." During the past two or three days several cases have occurred of young children straying from home or neglecting to return from their playing on the Heath. In all these cases the children were too young to give any properly intelligible account of themselves, but the consensus of their excuses is that they had been with a "bloofer lady." It has always been late in the evening when they have been missed, and on two occasions the children have not been found until early in the following morning. It is generally supposed in the neighborhood that, as the first child missed gave as his reason for being away that a "bloofer lady" had asked him to come for a walk, the others had picked up the phrase and used it as occasion served. This is the more natural as the favorite game of the little ones at present is luring each other away by wiles. A correspondent writes us that to see some of the tiny tots pretending to be the"bloofer lady" is supremely funny. Some of our caricaturists might, he says, take a lesson in the irony of grotesque by comparing the reality and the picture. It is only in accordance with general principles of human nature that the "bloofer lady" should be the popular role at these al fresco performances.
User ID: 628
I'm sure the mathematicians left out in the cold by the big data revolution of ML will rejoice that there was indeed a mathematical approach to LLMs over the pesky engineering approaches that were developed by the peons from MIT.
Damn this reminds me of the ML class I took back in my maths degree. We spent the whole term proving theorems about perceptrons rather than being taught any sort of ML that was being used in the world.
I can also report that I'm having some of the most fun and being more productive than I've ever been.
Same here.
the 'hard' sciences are on life support after decades of sneering at biologists
LMFAO yes absolutely. Even within physics the areas being dismantled are theoretical physics while the experimental physicists are carrying on doing their jobs just as well or even better before AI, because to them it's literally a complementary assistant that boosts them rather than replacing them. And even within theoretical physics the areas getting blasted the most are the most "rigorous" ones like QFT and GR while the ones that are still sort of saved from the worst of the shelling so far are things like lattice field theory etc. where people randomly go around doing approximations because otherwise nothing works...
In my very scholarly and medical opinion, I think you're suffering from Human to AI writing transmorigification. I thought your post was also at the very least highly AI modified but it may well be that AI has addled your brain so much that now you just naturally write that way.
A curious specimen indeed.
Yeah, this whole "permanent underclass" thing is a load of baloney. You aren't being saved from the permanent underclass if your net worth today is $10m or even $25m vs $1m or $10k. If that very specific scenario plays out, having a moderate amount of assets doesn't insulate you, instead it makes you juicy food worth concentrating on for the real big multi billion dollar players.
I'm decently well off and I've come to the (very sensible, I think) conclusion that in the unlikely event of rich oligarch AI dystopia, my lot lies with the ordinary man rather than the centimillionaire+ class.
Fun results:
Hilbert's tenth problem over (\mathbb{Q}) is undecidable
The quasi-Riemann hypothesis
The rational Hodge conjecture holds for every CM abelian variety
Integer multiplication can be done in sub-log-linear time. Oh, there's also a sub-log linear DFT.
What can I say: Man Proposes, AI Disposes...
Hoo boy. The question is, is the novel worthy of the award regardless of whether or not it's AI written standing on its own merits? If so then I suggest it gets the award and for next year the committee can update it's rules to forbid AI submissions.
If AI was able to write prescriptions for me, I would choose Astra over 95% of doctors.
Make that 99% of doctors and I'd agree. Smash the cartels!
Is there anything stopping humans from continuing to explore Navier-Stokes and related problems, even now that we have an oracle that can just tell us the final answer? Of course not. But we're irrational beings, and we're likely just not going to put the same kind of effort into it without the reward waiting at the end.
Sure yes I agree. But the fault for this lies with humans, not with AI. Humans should be blaming themselves for this and resolving to do better.
A lot of weird shit is about to happen, and I’d like to discuss it with you, not (just) with Claude.
Totally agreed. I'm becoming more and more convinced with what I'm seeing on a daily basis (not like I have any particularly strong links to the AI companies, so this isn't secret insider info or anything, just what I'm observing on the margins of the AI transformation, which has already made huge impacts in quant finance) that what makes us special is not our intelligence, but our humanity with all its flaws.
Looks like we're getting another big load of solutions soon from OpenAI, this time at least with more consideration for human mathematicians https://openai.com/index/advisory-group-on-mathematics-and-ai/ :
On August 28, we began training a new internal model. In addition to resolving the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize problem, this model has now resolved more than 100 long-standing open problems across most areas of mathematics. The pace of its progress in mathematics has surprised the mathematicians within OpenAI. This has led to internal discussions on the best way to inform the community of the rapid progress to prepare and adapt the field.
Exciting times, as they say. Their new group:
The group will operate independently from OpenAI. The group will have the freedom to offer advice we have not requested, comment on OpenAI’s impact on mathematics, and make its advice public. Its value depends on its members being able to exercise their own judgement and challenge ours. Its members will not be paid by OpenAI, and the group can change its membership as it sees fit. Importantly, the group will not be responsible for advising us on how to pace our internal progress on mathematics.
Working with this group is a first step. There are difficult questions ahead about how AI can support mathematical understanding and how the benefits of these capabilities can reach the wider community. We want mathematicians to be at the center of shaping the answers.
Initial Members of the Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, hosted at the Institute for Advanced Study:
François Charles (ENS-PSL)
Camillo De Lellis (IAS, GSSI)
Timothy Gowers (Collège de France, Cambridge)
Martin Hairer (EPFL, Imperial College London)
Nikhil Srivastava (Berkeley, Simons Institue)
Ulrike Tillmann (Oxford, INI)
Ravi Vakil (Stanford)
Edward Witten (IAS)
Melanie Matchett Wood (Harvard)
As an ex-mathematician who now works in a field with no time for sentimentality (if it works, we use it, if it doesn't, we throw it out) I'm quite happy to see AI push the boundaries of the field. My mathematician friends are understandably more reserved about things, but apart from those who literally wanted to just be an academic they're all at least somewhat interested. Equally though another part of me is quite pissed off that we now have a gaggle of commissaries who decide on when and how the top labs will be doling out crumbs of mathematical insight to the general public. This kind of crap, if anything, is what leads to the creation of the "permanent underclass", to use a phrase that is currently a la mode with the AI types. What next, a committee for AI and law? A committee for AI and medicine? A committee for AI and finance (I shudder)???
We've had proof of blowup in forced compressible 3D navier stokes even before we got it for the incompressible version. And yes, this is a theoretical result about partial differential equations with minimal relevance to the real world.
At this point the AI doubters should be eating a double serving of Crow. And the best thing about it all is how this is the worst AI will ever be.
In other news, OpenAI released GPT Image 2.5 today as well, representing yet another significant advance in AI generated images. I'd feel bad for the human artists etc., except the've been dead for over a year at this point and we might as well have their eventual replacement AI be as good as possible.
The Collatz so called proof was specifically developed to exploit a known bug in the Lean kernel. This proof was an attempt to actually solve the problem. It's like the difference between a virus appearing in the wild that wipes out the human race vs one that was specifically developed in the lab to wipe out the human race. Just because someone might prove the latter is theoretically possible that shouldn't make us paranoid and start worrying about natural viruses turning up that can wipe out the human race.
I'd be very very surprised if this proof there's a finite time blowup turned out to contain a bug.
China isn't ahead at this moment in time, but yes, they will be if western labs stop R&D for 12 months.
And this is why I like what China is doing so much. If western labs stop R&D then if not within 6 months, most definitely within 12 months nobody will be using your models anymore becuase they've all shifted over to the subsidised development Chinese models. Plus, China is now ahead in the AI race.
Surely you put the American datacenters in North Korea over Mongolia, no? That way if the US reneges they'll find out when they wake up tomorrow morning that their data centers are now being used to find the most effective way of nuking American soil...
Yeah, that's straight up not happening for the same reason that ghostwriting is so common these days, and honestly, who can blame world leaders? Their time is already very constrained and so high value that it's the correct play on the margins to get the wording of their speeches provided to them by a third party, whether that be AI or a ghostwriter.
AI just means that the rest of us can now do what the rich and powerful were already doing.
and had a reputation as the least academically rigorous undergraduate degree the University offered
Hey, Land Economy exists, though out of shame they've now changed the name to "Environment, Law, and Economics"...
I liked the Hlynka ban. Ban the banners, I say!
Bad ban.
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
If only everyone had their own Mysterious Magnate gifting them a chocolate factory maybe western countries wouldn't be in this mess...
Unironically they are mediocre stories and don't follow what's recognised as good modern storytelling. The iliad for example is about a month during the Trojan war, and the first 10 days of that is about a plague because Agamemnon was lecherous and wouldn't let go of a war sex slave he'd captured. The famous trojan horse story isn't even present in the Iliad, it ends before that point and just goes up until Hector is buried. Nor is the death of Achilles part of the Iliad.
It is very weird yes, and the Odyssey is only slightly better, the focus of the action and how much time is spent on different events is very weird and inconsistent according to modern tastes: Odyssesus nearly returns to Ithaca very early on in the story to the point where the people in his entourage can see it on the horizon, but then some asshole opens a bag full of stormy and dangerous winds that they have been explicitly told to never open (just put the bag tightly sealed in a chest and send it to the bottom of the ocean) and then they get blown back basically to their starting point. That bit reminded me of the Father Ted scene where Dogual presses this big red button on the airplane with a massive "Do Not Press" written right above it.
Yes, pains me to say this but in 2 years time a qualified plumber may well be worth more to countries for immigration purposes than a senior staff level engineer at Google.
Honestly meat processing needs to be paid much much more than it is at the moment. It's a very "dirty" job that still requires a decent amount of knowledge and skill (do you know your beef cuts? I don't know my beef cuts...) and the people doing it and suffering aren't any less human than middle manager Becky in HR with her mediorce degree and unmemorable experience managing a team of 4 people.
If this means Becky from HR gets to eat steak at a restaurant less often then so be it.
- Prev
- Next

Unironically Ubuntu desktop is very good these days and very user friendly. More user friendly than Windows actually, which today makes me want to tear my hair out with the ads it forces onto you and how it won't respect your registry choices as well as three dozen other serious problems.
More options
Context Copy link