Butlerian
Not robot-ist just don't like 'em
No bio...
User ID: 1558
But there is something fundamentally debasing and ugly about wallowing in your impotence like that.
What I think is MORE fundamentally debasing and ugly is you implying that we’re not allowed to call this Ruiner Of Nations out on his bullshit, in that doing so somehow makes us the ugly ones, not him.
I mean, what even is your entire post except a lengthy shaming of anti-Trudeau people? Read the rules in the header and cut that shit out.
If this story is true, did Colby think that the cardinal is not aware of the military abilities of Russia and China?
Given that those “abilities” are fairly anaemic, any knowledge that the cardinal has would increase Colby’s credibility.
Urban II, Eugene II, Gregory VIII, Innocent III, Honorius III, Gregory IX, Innocent IV…
So. Is the implication that people with the wrong political opinions are a bunch of cucks or what?
What I took from the preamble is that French people are a bunch of cucks.
Given that it’s illegal in France to do a paternity test, precisely because they worry that the results would cause the collapse of society, this all seems to fit together nicely.
Trump went so far as to say that he was planning to wipe out the entire civilization of Iran. Of course the pope spoke out against him.
A majority of popes would have considered this an unequivocal good. Indeed, several of them have tried to do it themselves.
- Prev
- Next

I think this statistic elides some subtleties which women IRL realise but which are non-obvious prima facie. While I am no longer under 30, my opinions now remain as they previously were: in that I would answer a polling question “Do you have a positive opinion of women” with a yes, but this is almost exclusively because I have a positive opinion of titties. “Do you have a positive opinion of women” is synonymous with “Are you heterosexual”; a yes answer comes not because I have a positive opinion of respecting a woman, or treating her and her opinions and professional goals with anything like the consideration I would do for a male peer (affirmative action is a great way to weight my priors that she’s not as competent as a man in the same job, that’s just an inevitability).
So I put it to you that possibly this dynamic is at play, and women are right to infer that mens’ positive opinion of them is positive in a way that they don’t want (or at least they’d like to check height and jawline before they decide whether they want). Under such conditions, it makes some sense that they would not reciprocate the demographic’s affections; and their opinions are based on an understanding of men which is MORE accurate, not less accurate, than that captured by the survey’s relative ratios.
More options
Context Copy link