DelendaEst
No bio...
User ID: 1199
DelendaEst
14d ago
Because Patel's Indian and this guy just hates white people is the only thing I can think of. Otherwise complete mystery.
DelendaEst
16d ago
The onboarding for my new job has been an annoyingly long process, and a lot of that seems to be processes to try to stop Indian fraud, including me needing to go to the recruiter's office to show them my ID in person because the client (the company I will actually be working for) had been burned so many times by Indians coming in to interview for different Indians.
DelendaEst
17d ago
To your job issue, I was laid off in January and had a really hard time in the job market. Dozen applications a week, no interviews, and only a couple even bothered to send a rote "we had more qualified applicants but thanks for applying" emails, most just ghosted me.
Then I updated my LinkedIn to be more attractive to recruiters. A recruiter got in touch with me within a week. Two weeks after that I had an interview. Day after interview, had a job offer for more money than the job which fired me at the start of the year.
In talking to Claude about this it said that most mid-market software dev jobs use recruiters and that the few jobs that do make it to the job boards are often not even "real" jobs (already internally filled or looking for H1-B and the job listing is just to check a box) and the ones that are get 100+ applications in the first day. Not sure how the market for Network Engineering works, but from my experience getting in touch with a recruiter might be a good idea.
DelendaEst
27d ago
I got a 1530 and wasn't even close to top of my class, to me it seems like you guys are all living on easy mode.
DelendaEst
30d ago
Given that Jews have been here a lot longer and thus are not benefiting from as much selection effect I strongly expect that Indians will lose that edge soon enough.
DelendaEst
1mo ago
The notAllMen part of that really annoyed me. The daughter correctly identifies that a lot of the manosphere fans were mistreated by women and then generalized to all women and that makes them wrong and sad. But all men, including her dad, need to feel shame for the choices of those 15 year olds. I know that if it weren't for double standards the woke wouldn't have any standards at all but the brazenness of it never fails to shock me.
DelendaEst
2mo ago
I made a project of reading through some of the classic sci fi I hadn't read before a few years ago and most of it I liked, some I loved, some I thought was meh, but there was only one classic I loathed and that was Childhood's End. It was very pro transhumanism and viewed the entirety of humanity changing to the point they are no longer meaningfully human as a win whereas I see it as mass suicide. The spiders genetically alter the humans plot reminded me of this.
DelendaEst
5mo ago
Immigrants are taking our jobs, except when they're mooching off welfare. (You can make this not-doublethink by phrasing it as "either immigrants are taking our jobs, or they're mooching off welfare". But at that point the fig leaf has wilted and you might as well just admit that you don't have principled economic reasons to oppose immigration.)
That seems pretty different to me. It seems very possible to believe that a large number of immigrants have jobs where they are working for below market wages and undercutting native wages as a result (both illegal immigrants and H1B fall under this) and also that many more are not working at all and are mooching, and that only a small number have market rate jobs. This does not require believing that any single individual is doing both at once in a double think manner. It is even possible for a given immigrant to believe they have done both, say starting as a wage undercutting day laborer and then mooching off of welfare once he was able to get signed up for benefits, or that this individual with the wage undercutting job is ALSO getting food stamps or medicad supplementally or for their dependents. I don't think it requires believing the superposition of A and NOT A simultaneously the way the other examples do.
DelendaEst
5mo ago
I think the reasoning is (1) What he (Mangione) did was right; so (2) he should be acquitted; but (3) his best chance of being acquitted is if he didn't do it; so (4) I will convince myself he was framed.
I am also certain that is the thought process, I just don't see how you can actually convince yourself of that. That's why I used the people jokingly giving alibis as a counterpoint. That seems like the same thought process, but processed by a sane mind.
DelendaEst
5mo ago
I really don't understand the "cops framed him and planted backpack" style comments. They support him BECAUSE he killed a CEO, how can they square that with thinking he was framed. How can you love him for doing it and think he didn't do it at the same time? Literal crazy people I guess.
This is very different from the meme of "Hey Luigi, thanks for helping me hang drywall at X time on X day" which is a joking attempt to provide an alibi. That is gross but at least only requires them to hold the thought of "he did it, and its a good thing" and not ALSO "but actually he was framed."
DelendaEst
5mo ago
That wild difference between patrons and views screams "bot inflation" to me. There are tons of youtubers getting like 5% of that viewership who have an order of magnitude more patrons.
That Candace is an attention whore and the fact that she touts those viewer numbers to make herself seem like a big deal, and that she is a conspiracy theorist who surely assumes everyone else is already botting (many are of course, but hardly all) are all ALSO reasons to make me think her support is largely fake. I assume a mix of bot views she buys to big herself up and ones provided by China and Russia who benefit by promoting the biggest morons (same reason I assume Hasan Piker and the other craziest leftists you can think of have a ton of bots).
DelendaEst
5mo ago
In America today it is already the case that basically no one has to die of hunger or scarcity. But there are still fent zombies, crazy people, and wildly anti-social cohorts which one might want to keep away from ones home.
DelendaEst
5mo ago
From the Indians I have worked with I'd say India follows a particularly brutal version of the 80/20 rule, call it then 98/2 rule. There are a few who are really, really good. The rest are so bad I don't know how they got through their interview (though I have heard having your friend do the remote parts of the interview for you is common amongst that community).
DelendaEst
5mo ago
There's no stable HBD argument that rules out antisemitism. You can't build an argument around 13/52, that simultaneously avoids questions about Jewish over-representation.
That doesn't seem right to me, if anything stable HBD arguments would notice the higher average IQ of jews and say antisemitism is combination of invalid jealousy and valid concern about ingroup bias, same as lefty feelings about white people in general are.
DelendaEst
6mo ago
If he had been the one to bring it up that might follow, but it was a reply in a thread about the topic. Gender was brought up by others in an "of course we all agree" fashion, he just replied.
In your example your reply of God Does Not Exist was in reply to a thread about what workplace activities we could do to advance muslim goals then that is very different from saying it in the middle of a budget meeting.
If people who bring up politics at work should be fired then it is the liberals of Google who should be on the block, not him, since they are the ones who brought it up.
DelendaEst
6mo ago
The google AI guy didn't even say "awkward" stuff, he just replied to a company chat about trans activism with pretty standard views of "no such thing".
Awkward for highly liberal environments, normal for normal places, run of the mill for conservative places, and just the air we breath as of 15 years ago.
DelendaEst
6mo ago
Miyares, however, had the misfortune of representing a party that has spent the better part of the past decade defending statements from Trump that would have previously been undefendable all the while bemoaning cancel culture and the alleged erosion of free speech.
I get this. This is why I voted against Trump in every primary and general, despite his policies being closer to mine than the Dems. I was rewarded with Dark Brandon and open borders and yet still I say Trump is unacceptable.
But all of the sneering Dems like you who are so very shocked by Trump have now voted Jones. And nothing that Trump said is even 1/10th as bad as "people who disagree with me should have their two year old son die in his mothers arms" and saying it is close is offensive. I have learned my lesson. If it is to be filth I will stick with making fun of people and policies I like and you can stick with wishing death and misery upon children, and may God have mercy on your soul.
DelendaEst
6mo ago
I dunno, I'm not from Virginia but I am from a state the borders it, and I am a Republican who didn't really care about Earle-Sears or Spanberger much either way but I would have crawled across glass to vote against Jones, and the fact that he won while salivating about the death of republican children makes me want very bad things to happen to every dem in VA.
DelendaEst
6mo ago
The disabled vets thing on his channel always gets me. I certainly don't begrudge generous payouts to people who got seriously hurt fighting for their country, but there are people getting 3-4K per month who were helicopter repair techs in the military and auto repair techs now. That just seems bananas, and as he always mentions he has NEVER seen a vat come through his show who does not have 20K+ in disability so it doesn't seem like it is correlated to any actual metrics of desert.
DelendaEst
6mo ago
Assuming the UK and the rest of Europe don't deal with their Muslim problem and population replacement continues apace it will not be too much longer before there are a few muslim societies with nukes and modern militaries which are willing to declare war on Israel. I think that is the biggest risk factor for number 2.
DelendaEst
7mo ago
This is why the ideological capture of places like Reddit and old Twitter was such a problem, as long as it is viewed as the "neutral" option network effects make it hard to leave and make any alternative which is founded explicitly as a refuge from the bias fated to become the opposite bias but 10 times worse. The right failed to do this several times with truth social and parlor and gab, and its why the left hated Elon buying Twitter so much as this gave the right one of the neutral spaces and the left's attempt to make a new site has gone little better than the right's attempts.
DelendaEst
7mo ago
I think its an effort thing. Dem mayors instruct their police to not even try to stop rampant arson and not to bother investigating afterwards, and on the off chance they do then the Dem DA doesn't prosecute it. But Biden had the FBI spend a shit ton of man hours combing through every source possible for every minor rioter who could be charged with anything at all.
I would prefer we use at least a minor portion of that effort arresting arsonists and burying them under the jail. As it stands, the effect is "rioters who are pro-dem causes get to have authorities look the other way, right wingers get the Eye of Sauron for 4 years straight", with the added bonus of lefties bringing J6 up every time they want to say their enemies are worse than them, and the dem friendly media reported on every single arrest and trial for a J6er, keeping it in the mind of the public.
Again, I don't care about the J6ers, they are morons let them hang. But selective punishment on this scale, and where what I think is the far worse crime gets the pass while the lesser gets the book thrown at them, is worse. If you guys wanted me to care about J6 so much you had a whole summer to exact some kind of punishment on rioters, you didn't, and now here we are.
DelendaEst
7mo ago
I will be fine with rearresting all of the Jan 6 people once about 100,000 BLM rioters have been arrested, tried, and sat in jail for as long as the median J6 rioter did before being pardoned. Until then every time someone on the left brings it up all I hear is "rules for thee, but not for me."
And I really do mean it, I will be fine with that. I do not support the J6 people and do want them punished, all rioters should be. But while the feds under Biden spend years making sure every one of them was punished other dems have turned an intentional blind eye to their own thugs, a pattern that persists in DAs refusing to charge lefties who punch pro-lifers on camera. I want rioters punished, but I will not accept ONLY right wing protestors being punished. Pardoning them was wrong, accepting second class status is worse.
So I agree, be the change you want to see. You guys put 10,000 heads on spikes is a good first step.
DelendaEst
7mo ago
If it had JUST been the office joke I would be 95% of the way there with you (not 100 though, because jokes like that are often the outer tendrils of real belief), but the full context of saying his opponent should be shot, their kids should be shot in front of them, and then doubling down on that when called out means that no, this is not OK. Focusing on the office joke is obfuscation.
He is saying Kirk actually died and that still didn't generate much actual shock and disapproval in normies, so an event without a dead body is unlikely to do more.
More options
Context Copy link