FruitfulLemonyLemons
No bio...
User ID: 370
FruitfulLemonyLemons
3mo ago
It's some chemical found in a lot of fruits, there was supposedly a study suggesting if you take a mega concentrated dose of it it reverses a bunch of symptoms of aging.
A bunch of people in this community were trying it out a while back.
FruitfulLemonyLemons
3mo ago
Checking in on the fisetin bros, it's been about 5 years. Some of you were doing it regularly. Still going strong or have you decided it isn't actually doing anything?
FruitfulLemonyLemons
4mo ago
With all honesty, I suggest next Sunday visiting your local Baptist megachurch. I get that it isn't your vibe and w/e, but think of it as engaging your curiosity, because I promise it'll be a different experience than what you're relating here. You can just go, satisfy your curiosity, and never go again.
Or just go to Catholic Mass (just make sure you stay seated for Communion, participating in Communion is a massive faux pas if you're not a member in good standing) but I (unfortunately) expect you'll just be bored.
idk anything but a church whose whole existence is to be political, vs a church whose whole existence is to be a church. (UU and UCOC and many others exist to be political)
FruitfulLemonyLemons
7mo ago
Has he been on the radar a long time? I literally heard of him for the first time like a week ago.
FruitfulLemonyLemons
8mo ago
Riots during Trump admins have been politically genius. If the admin Does What It Takes to restore order, he confirms the image the left has painted of him of being a dictator. If he just lets them run their course (which he has done every time thus far) his presidency looks chaotic and people yearn for normalcy.
Puts him in a double bind.
(If you ask me, if you're in a double bind anyway you should do the right thing.)
FruitfulLemonyLemons
8mo ago
Devon Eriksen effortpost on Twitter
He argues that Trump and Elon are sort of polar opposite personality types in terms of "guile". Elon being an autistic engineer has and expects a "guileless" communication style devoted to simply conveying the truth as you see it. Trump being a Machiavellian type sees communication as a tool of power (see also Scott Adams' talks on "persuasion" and Trump) and wants loyalty with no expectation that he'll give it to you straight.
Notably, despite calling Trump "Machiavellian" he sees both people as earnestly trying to avert disaster for America, with Elon seeing the debt as the most important existential threat and Trump seeing immigration and entrenched bureaucracy as the most important existential threats.
Fascinating take overall and worth the read, here's the full text:
These guys don't understand each other.
Elon Musk is too guileless. He says exactly what he thinks is true with little regard for how others will react. He alienates allies by airing disputes in public instead of settling them behind closed doors.
Because he is a sperg engineer who leads companies of sperg engineers, and to do this, you must be 100% truthful and transparent.
Donald Trump is too guileful. He says exactly what will advance his plans with little regard for telling people what he actually thinks. He alienates allies by expecting their unconditional support without sharing any aspect of his strategic plans with them.
Because he is a New York real estate developer, who thrives on winning negotiations and gaining advantage from unshared knowledge, and to do this, you must be 100% calculating and opaque.
Here's what happened.
Musk worked super hard, and took great personal risks, to get a head start on balancing the federal budget. He correctly believes that federal spending is an existential risk to the nation.
Trump regards those savings as a political asset.
And, since he lacks leverage in congress, he took them and traded them for other things he wanted, apparently dealing with border control, the courts, etc... problems which he correctly believes are an existential threat to the nation.
He may have concrete plans for balancing the federal budget in the future, but, frustratingly, he won't tell his own team what they are.
Trump could have squared this in advance with Musk, in private, but he appears to either have assumed his loyalty (treating an ally like a subordinate), or been unable to persuade him.
Likewise, Musk could have raised his complaints in private, but either he was too upset to try, or was not able to reach an agreement when he did.
Trump doesn't understand how to deal with spergs. You have to tell them the truth, not expect them to read subtext. They refuse to read subtext. They want to be spoken to honestly.
Musk doesn't understand how to deal with Machiavellians. They think of language as a power tool, and think of those who insist on truth as naive.
Both men are used to being in charge, and are used to dealing with subordinates, who must cater to their preferred style of communicating.
They are both therefore uniquely unsuited to having both the patience and the capability to speak the other's language.
The truth is that both the federal budget and the federal bureaucracy are existential threats to America. Maximum priority.
Trump's concerns about the "art of the possible" are probably valid, but Musk's sense of urgency should not be dismissed lightly.
It is churlish to leverage the superior strengths and talents of people on the autism spectrum while making zero allowances for their unique needs.
That said, spergs can be frustratingly dogmatic, even when they aren't the richest and most successful man in the world.
A few other things to notice:
The democrats have said nothing. That's because there are no democrats. They have no independent intellectuals, only paid schills.
A response will not be forthcoming until the wholly organic grassroots PR committees have met, and the wholly grassroots talking heads have been cut a wholly organic grassroots check.
There's also a strong case to be made for Team Nothing Ever Happens. Remember that Musk will sometimes shut up when he calms down, and Trump has no problem calling someone the Antichrist one day and working with him the next.
FruitfulLemonyLemons
8mo ago
Demographic shift of Boomers moving into retirement, lower birth rates
FruitfulLemonyLemons
8mo ago
Do you think in the coming years the higher ratio of older people cashing out 401k's etc vs younger people contributing will put constant, unrelenting downward pressure on stock prices? Or is that a drop in the bucket compared to other factors in the market?
FruitfulLemonyLemons
10mo ago
Ringworld maybe? The team has some strife but they're mostly functional.
If any of y'all were at the ACX meetup in SF today, I'm the road trip guy and it was fun meeting you
More options
Context Copy link