GorillionRialGraphene
Hopefully funnier than that last guy...
User ID: 692
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
Well, the question is what is the difference between real imagine, and a fake image that is visually indistinguishable on a technical level from a real one? (Assuming you do not have an external knowledge about the subject matter in the image.)
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
The theme of my username is commonly associated with trolling campaigns.
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SGWizajL7tA&t=264
Ignoring the obviously loaded question video title, here's him talking about it.
GorillionRialGraphene
10mo ago
Seems like a lot of words to say very little. You needed 1069 words to say Australians wanted to be white untill 1960?
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
I'm aware that Jewish people are smart, and intelligence is a predictor of improved life outcomes. However, you'll notice my post only contains the word jewish once, as I'm specifically referring to the subgroup of zionists. Bernie Sanders (or at least, the idealized 2016 version of him) is "Jewish" but very clearly has a different agenda then zionists do. Netanyahu is clearly a zionist, but is becoming unpopular with Israelis.
Basically, Jews have been so poorly treated by others that they were funneled into doing things others did not want to
I've heard this one before, but I have yet to hear a convincing argument that as to how money lending is an oppressive job. If you were to oppress a people group with high intelligence and labor skills, it would probably look like the Nazis forcing interned Jews to assemble radios and electronic components.
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
Zionists aren't one person, neither are any other group. Everyone has their own reasons for supporting war in the middle east. For some, it might be some religious God's chosen people dream. (which they will swear is different that Nazi aryanism, of course) For others, their goals are more pagmatic, they want Arab countries to be destabilized to get cheap oil.
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
I appreciate the response, but again, this isn't sentience. GPT is just text completion. It's not an intelligence, it's a tokenized list of words. Finding links between ideas by consuming the literary cannon of the human race is a really cool trick, and undoubtably helpful, but not general intelligence.
For once I’d like to hear an argument that doesn’t rely on Cartesian dualism, stoner metaphysics, or from people still clinging to GOFAI nostalgia like the Japanese holdouts.
Sure: I'll consider AI to be possibly sentient when it can tell me a thought it had 10 minutes ago, and then prove that it actually had that thought by showing me a peek into the workings of it's mind.
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
I am aware that this is a very hot button issue to ask, and had cleared it with a mod before posting.
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
If you've used right wing websites for any amount of time, you're bound to find someone pointing out the vast and far reaching influence of zionists in the US government, media, and finance. I'm sure you've seen the infographics showing the prolific and far reaching influence of groups like AIPAC or other powerful zionist special interest groups, as well the Epstein/Maxwell Mossad connection.
-
I define "zionist" as people with a real or imagined Jewish identity or loyalty, conspiring to promote their ideological and financial interests at the expense of others. This is done through finacialization, campaign finance and lobbying, and manufacturing consent through media.
-
Race is a social construct. George Soros literally changed his race to white, and worked for the Nazi party during the Nazi occupation of Germany during WWII.
Now, I've heard plenty of arguments pointing all of this out, but what are the arguments against it?
Since I'm capable of self-reflection, I'm aware that Black identity politics have a similar view of white people.
-
I might have a high probability of seeing zionists among journalists/bureaucrats/intelligentsia I don't like.
-
However, a Black person will look above them and see a white person in power nearly 100% of the time. After all, the diaspora of "white" people are quite prolific.
I want to try taking off my magic sunglasses that cause me to see zionists everywhere, and see a different perspective. Most left-coded media either denies that this is happening at all, or accuses you of being a bad person for noticing it. What other arguments are there against it?
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
Seeing the farm's harassment of Byuu/Near was what caused me to be agaist them. Reguardless of what you think of Near, BSNES and their reverse engineering work was more important than anything farmers had done or will ever do.
GorillionRialGraphene
1yr ago
I rewrote this comment like 5 times, but I would concede to the feminists that women probably do deserve some special privileges, as they have been subjected to unfair evolutionary forces.
For a large part of human history, women have been subject to evolutionary pressure that removes their agency. Being unable to fight back against men's sexual advances results in a successful propagation of genes for weakness and mental vulnerability. As such, women tend to have a biological predisposition to certain "negative" traits.
This basically a vulgar version of the radfem argument, if I understand it correctly, right? Same reason they say all sex with men is rape: All the women who didn't like rape were killed off, resulting in the genetic stock of the human race consisting of women who "like" rape.
I can't see any mainstream social media site besides reddit being valuable for AI training data. Twitter isn't longform enough.
More options
Context Copy link