Why I thought this was more of a fun thing. Most girls besides online too much feminists want some male glaze. My workout clothes and fairly common for a man is like basketball shorts and a t-shirt. It doesn’t highly body parts. Female gym clothes are often form fitting lululemon stuff, 30-50% of the time the top exposes the stomache and even actually breast material. A few percent you can make out actual vagina lips.
Those outfits provide a small performance gain but greatly stimulate the male attention. Plausible deniability of wanting attention.
And yes female interests in hip exercises and squatting is primarily to develop their body for male interests or their husband. Combined with form fitting closing it’s a lot for the reptilian parts of the male brain.
Most interesting thing is if I ran a poll female only “Should men eye fuck girls at the gym”. It would be 100% no. But actual female fashion trends optimize for that.
Opt-out
14d ago
Is it wrong to look at girls in the gym?
If it’s wrong then why do the all wear form fitting clothing or even more like a sporty bra? Why do some of their workout moves look a little like sexual movements (though they do have a legit exercise component)?
Opt-out
14d ago
Listing countries tells you nothing about who has the wealth in that country. I agree Israel itself has surprisingly small amount of very rich. My guess is it’s because companies have limited ability to really scale there.
The wealthiest families lists seems weird to me and I am not sure how the are separating “family” from “individual”. Why is Ellison a family? Founder is still in charge. Sassoon is notably not on the lists despite reports of a $100b. If you just went richest it would be Jewish. Notable there are not any old American money clans on the lists. Culturally this is a very American thing. Maybe it’s more old world versus new world with building clans. The closest thing to an old-moneyed clan in the US would be the Pritzkers but that’s still not that old.
On (1) you just read about random Jewish families with this kind of wealth. Like when Danielle Sassoon resigned it turns out she was Jewish and her family has offshore trusts in the 10s of billions. (2). It’s frowned upon by non Jews. Mathew 19:24 - “it’s easy for a camel to pass thru the eye of the needle; than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God” Sure people are less religious today but hoarding money has been frowned up in Western Culture. Carnegie etc have found things to do with their money to benefit their civilization. Western Culture has long been non for being less tribal and familial relations so doing things with money to benefit society is cherished versus hoarding money. Blood historically has meant less to white people. (3). True (4). Not all Jews but it’s always a Jew is like a truism.
So yes there are more examples of Jews hoarding money in clans. Safras, Rothschild, Sassoons. While American fortunes do tend to dissipate over time.
But generally I just like to rant that assimilation never completely happens. Group traits persist that maintain differences between immigrant groups and anglos. The Italians still have a 70% higher crime rate in America than Heritage Americans.
Opt-out
15d ago
And course it was put on by some perfidious cabal of over line professors. That’s obvious. Sure they wanted to reach out to Latin audiences. They chose island boy sex passion video. They chose 100% Spanish. You are motte and baileying this.
Funny thing is if Kid Rock put on an identical performance instead of a black/jew production company we would have AOC lecturing on how white men oversexualize brown bodies and brown people are not welfare queens. And let’s be clear on one thing the money the NFL wants is the wealthy Mexican money not Caribbean’s. It’s not targeted correctly.
Nothing. A guy can be funny even if you disagree with his message. He just has that autistic presentation that’s legitimately hilarious.
When he says things like he doesn’t want to live by black people sure that’s a layup because saying things that everyone knows but your not suppose to say is easy humor. Especially in Chicago when the city is very racially divided and the black neighborhoods are very violent.
Opt-out
15d ago
This was being reported the day after. I have no clue the difference between the two data sets.
Opt-out
15d ago
Fuentes is funny because he’s just a funny guy.
Latinos can obviously be white. Amerindian is a better slur. Spanish blood people are considered extremely close to proper white.
I also don’t think Fuentes hates the Jews. Jews are not fully assimilated in America. They have values around money that white people do not. Mostly a desire you see pop up of generating large amounts of generational wealth which is looked down on by the rest of society. Plus an increased ability to do some really bad things.
Opt-out
16d ago
I thought I saw data that half time viewership fell significantly versus the game but yes it was not the most watched. It’s not all Bad Bunny’s fault because the game was dreadful. It both lacked star power and was just not good football. I started playing on my phone by the second quarter.
One thing I’ve been playing with is whether the promotion of Bad Bunny is essentially “leftist are the real racists” evidence. I think the show was promotion Third Worldism and not just Latino culture. In very much the same way when Algebra becomes racists. Or the SAT. In the ‘90s the left and the right had differences but both sides actually believed things like affirmative action could fix things, yelling about black families, rap culture value promotion, etc were important parts of diversity. It was believed that with some assimilation pressure we could all be equal.
The right is probably more explicitly racists and willing to say things like don’t like browns or worse Haitians in because they are too dumb to be Americans. The left though I think believes the same things. A non-racists left would say things like diversity is our strength but also be against oversexualization of brown women. I don’t believe their is a belief on the left that the imported people can assimilate to all the cultural traits most would agree make a good society.
Opt-out
16d ago
Like you say though they have not tried that route. It’s by design they’ve chosen war with legacy media and to build in parallel. There are significant benefits to building alternative since MSM at best will give any tie to your opponent. Trump has successfully gotten completely loss of credibility from the msm by half the population. The weakness is this leads to a Cold War of dueling narratives and makes it nearly impossible for a Reagan Revolution style victory.
Opt-out
16d ago
I don’t believe the Trump admin could frame the shootings as a mistake. That would imply incompetence. That makes them look weak.
One issue with social media these days is now everyone understands the tactics of protestors and thus know also the counter tactics to deploy. The media can not just control one narrative. The alt narratives gets promoted just as much. The counter to the counter movements is out there.
Furthermore, in the age of social media we now have video so protestors can’t just push until something happens. Good won’t just be lost soccer mom who happened to get in ICE way. Pretti won’t be “just directing tactic”. Someone will have video of him kicking ICE vehicles in a prior encounter. In the ‘60s. Goode would be a civil rights icon who was just dropping the kids off at school who the nazis shot.
The entire school segregation move and the evil parents yelling back in the day may have fizzled out after a few viral videos of white kids getting their ass kicked by black kids during segregation.
The two narrative world is what we live in today. The old protest movements do not work as well when it’s become trivial for dual narratives to be maintained.
Opt-out
17d ago
I have nothing against waitresses. To be clear. I did not create the girl bosses for waitresses meme. Waitress is the existing internet terminology for the social convention when Men date down in abilities/class/status/etc. I can not change the words used for a thing because I personally find waitresses virtuous.
She did that after marrying for money. It’s a well known trope of rich husband funding his partners money losing small business. A hobby business isn’t the same thing as being a girl boss. I don’t know enough about this business to know how real it is. When people talk about marrying the waitress I don’t believe said waitress has to have zero interests or hobbies. If I’m being honest something about Bezos wife just vibes lower class. It’s like porn I know it when I see it.
Opt-out
17d ago
I feel like you are being too literal. Aztecs had a few million and conquistadors had a few hundred. That’s in the same category of why I am referring to. White repeatedly won military battles despite being vastly outnumbered.
That was my point. Just that.
Opt-out
17d ago
By “hot girl job” that needs to code as the primary reason they got the job and not one trait of many traits. The cofounder of Kalshi is clearly a hot girl but also a girl boss. Hillary Clinton was attractive at one point. A Bloomberg sales rep is always hot but that is clearly white collar work and therefore not a waitress.
Opt-out
18d ago
I can only thoroughly define one person as not a waitress - Hillary Clinton. Personally I think Bezos wife is 100% a waitress. People seem to be saying she is “higher status” as a presenter. I don’t believe status alone keeps your from being a waitress. Depending on what you stress I think a lawyerly test would go thru these traits:
- Works with your mind/IQ
- Higher/lower status
- Job requires doing things that stress social ability in female codes ways
- Work in career explicitly for money (Jobs wife codes waitress a little)
Someone mentioned kindergarten teachers as a popular billionaire wife job. That to me codes very high on the waitress scale.
Opt-out
18d ago
That’s the story of the Aztecs. It also seems like the conquest of India and China was with few men.
Opt-out
19d ago
What if you fail at “your own class”? I feel like I’m in this bucket for various reasons. I would have preferred a girl from my own education bucket (dms mostly open). Now I date down. I am fine with that. The choice between my own age girl boss or an Argentinian 28 year old seems easy.
That’s the scissor statement in this. Everything you described are hot girl jobs. Including company ex-husband probably funded and lost money on.
This is a Greek weather girl. That’s a presenter right? That girl gets guys for her feminine energy not because she spent a decade grinding at McKinsey. Greek weather girl
Opt-out
19d ago
One interesting twitter debate going on right now is the billionaires prefer waitresses. Maybe not even interesting but complete culture war. The thing I’m seeing for the billionaires don’t marry waitresses is a very pedantic view of waitresses when I think the meaning is more like girl bosses versus attractive girl whose primary goal is not making money but finding a husband.
I do not know if anyone really disagrees with this. Like it’s a spectrum right? Only Jeb Bush married a girl who doesn’t even speak the same language but I assume was very cute. The spectrum is something like Laurene Jobs who did a little corporate prestige jobs and went to Stanford MBA then quit working versus Jeb Bush who just picked a big booty Latina at 18.
I feel like guys often pick the “waitress” over the girl boss. But the people saying the billionaires never pick the waitress are being excessively pedantic. The model isn’t a waitress. The presenter isn’t a waitress (Bezos). The art hoe isn’t a waitress.
I would say the best smart guys tend to marry the Princeton girl early like Bezos or Gates or Zuck. But over 30 the waitress traits start to show up.
Personally I would prefer girl who has career and interesting life but I have way more options in the waitress category of attractive with some things going on.
Got told people didn’t know the debate. I think this is the twitter posts that started it. debate
Opt-out
20d ago
He is British and Dutch. S Africans were settlers like the US. Genetically and culturally he’s from the same stock as the founding fathers.
Warren Buffet had a paper route when he was 13. A little older but not much. That involves picking up a heavy stack of papers, walking around your neighborhood for like an hour alone, an about once a month you were the collection arm of the newspaper company. I too had a paper route around the same age. There’s actually a lot of billies whose first job was a paper route.
Around the same age (late elementary school) my memories were watching Independence Day on HBO every morning, then walking to the local ballpark to meet friends and play baseball everyday during the summer. Like Sandlot though often without a full 9.
The interesting thing about Buffet is his dad was a congressmen so he had to have some money but he still had a paper route. The family I guess wanted to instill work ethic and values. I also think there is a bit of wanting independence as a kid and getting to walk around the neighborhood for an hour and have your own money. Potentially we were also extremely bored back then. No phone to doomscroll on for an hour so you needed to find things to do.
My gut says the nanny state on children takes more than one generation to establish. I did things independently as a kid therefore I will never think a 10 year old doing things is child abuse. But my kids may raise children in a nanny state because they will only have my stories doing things as a kid and not personal experience.
This is one reason to consider living in a lower-middle class immigrant community. I think Miami still has some areas like this where you can be in that culture but still 15 minutes to civilization. And the immigrants tended to be higher quality ones than ones who walked across a border in S Florida.
Usually when someone goes viral for ick guy was looking at me it’s some tatted up chick who’s not that hot.
Gym bros wear completely different clothing that doesn’t show off so I don’t think tight lulus etc are for comfort. It’s what they are socially allowed to wear to be hot and get attention and I think they like it.
I believe I have seen articles on female only gyms and they always fail and no one goes to them.
More options
Context Copy link