Hahaha! You made my day :)
Yes. I was a naval academy graduate, but am now a pacifist.
A major purpose of the Iran War is formation of combat leaders. I haven't seen anyone else mention this elsewhere. But it is quite explicit within the military officer hierarchy that one of the main reasons we invade for "funsies" is to keep us in practice for when we actually "need" to invade someone for real.
I believe your link goes to a problem from the arc-agi-1 dataset, not the arc-agi-3. The former is basically "solved" at this point.
The callousness is the point, isn't it? No one self-labels as "I want to bomb brown people". It's an accusation against other people that they are callous because "They want to bomb brown people." Suggesting that someone else is callous doesn't strike me as callous.
It's because they wrote a "good prompt" to get the models "thinking" in the "right way". No data leakage here.
The highest scoring AI couldn't complete more that 0.5% [on ARC-AGI-3]
It's worth pointing out that within a day, the AIs had gotten to 36%: https://www.symbolica.ai/blog/arc-agi-3.
In general, though, I agree. My take is that AIs are good at solving leetcode style problems but nothing bigger. The way to be productive with them is to know how to divide up your tasks into leetcode tasks for the AI and the non-leetcode tasks for people.
As soon as streaming became the main business it was over, because bandwidth considerations came into play, similar to the space considerations of Redbox, and it was thus impossible to keep an inventory of that size, especially when the licensing agreements were more complicated and probably required them to pay for rights even for stuff that wasn't in high demand.
It's 100% the licensing agreements that cause this shortage, and not bandwidth.
Your write ups have reminded me of someone I think the motte would enjoy learning about: Ichizo Hayashi. He was a kamikaze pilot in the Japanese Navy and---oddly---a committed Christian. He has been particularly useful to historians because he kept a diary and wrote letters to his mother about his training regimen.
Just several days before his kamikaze mission, he wrote:
The enemy's actions are being blunted. There will be victory for us. It will be the last finishing blow by our crash dives. I am happy.
For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain. I truly can feel this keenly. I am grateful that I am living. However, it is a marvel that we are living now. Naturally we are persons who must die. I do not think to attach a reason to our dying. I only seek the enemy to make a crash dive.
I added the bold. It's a quote from the bible that is quite well known in American Christianity, and widely recited by American chaplains on the eve of deployments. It still boggles my mind that this young Japanese man found meaning in his kamikaze mission via Christianity. And that Christians today who would otherwise find Hayashi incredibly foreign and evil derive the same meaning for the same work but an "enemy" cause.
This type of primary source history from the Japanese side is probably not what your actually interested in reading right now, but the book I read about this is Listen to the Voices from the Sea. It's got a lot more of Hayashi's diary entries and a handful of other authors as well.
There's also US nuclear weapons in Germany. They're under a shared US-NATO command structure. German officers are nominally in charge of delivering these weapons in a time of war. Does that mean Germany "possesses" nuclear weapons? Only the test author knows :(
My impression is that there were lots of ambiguous questions like this where some answers could be reasonably argued either way.
I fully endorse this take.
My minor add is that there is a nice website https://fal.ai that provides easy-to-use API access to all of these video models. It is profitable and so not going away. Openrouter (https://openrouter.ai) previously only specialized in serving text models, but they have made recent experimental API improvements to add multimedia output as well.
The media APIs aren't quite as interchangeable as the text APIs, and providers are making an effort to provide some sort of moat around weird features in their APIs to make no frontier model a drop-in replacement for another frontier model. But media generation obviously isn't going away.
at common law
You use the preposition "at" here throughout your post when non-lawyer me would naively have said "in common law". Why?
I work on the research-side of AI and infodumps like this are super helpful for me to get a handle on how people actually use AI. Thank you.
But I want to push back on this comment:
Users on themotte accused me of generating slop here- no, that’s bad SEO. Good SEO is concise and has a few highly relevant keywords. Bad SEO is a bunch of irrelevant slop. Regardless, these are short sentences that I guarantee hardly any human reads - it is mostly read by bots at this point.
The fact that humans don't read this SEO is what makes it slop. You (and others like you) are what have made writing these "machine only SEO articles" necessary, and why google is increasingly shitty. It was slop before AI and is still slop today (just more efficiently produced slop). You have poisoned the internet commons with this slop and made the internet a measurably less useful place for me.
For this, I hate you and the millions of people like you who have ruined the internet. I understand that you are working within the constraints of "the algorithm", and each of your individual actions has not meaningfully impacted my life negatively, and that I have probably even benefited from some of the actions of people like you (I haven't bought clothing in >10 years, so I doubt I've benefited from you personally). But nevertheless I believe the overall effect you all (as a group) are having on society is net-negative. And for this I hate you. As I type this I realize that this hatred is probably bad for my soul, and so I also feel a need to ask your forgiveness for this hatred.
Thanks for the clarification. I'd be curious if there is anything that I would consider a datacenter that is located in a business zone instead of an industrial zone. In my mind, a "server room" doesn't become a "data center" until you start measuring the size in acres.
I suspect this whole effort is basically just Europeans catching up to how Americans already do things in practice. (That's my general uncharitable impression of most standards organizations that start with "International".)
Following your dream neighborhood link and a few other I found this post by @Southkraut from 1 year ago:
My wife... WORKED AS A KINDERGARDENER (emphasis hers) FOR LESS THAN HALF A YEAR
I just wanted to highlight that to the German brain "kindergardener" is literally someone who "gardens children" and is the teacher of the class, but to my American brain a "kindergardener" is someone who is enrolled in kindergarten and is the student.
I have 3 thoughts about this:
- I'm going to have kids in kindergarten for the next 3 years. They and their "gardeners" are going to suffer through so many dad jokes along these lines.
- I'm curious when this semantic shift happened. I assume it happened during the time of mandatory public schooling in the early 1900s, but don't know how to prove it. Google ngrams doesn't give me any meaningful insights here. (If anyone knows of any tools for studying this semantic shift, I would love to hear about them! I'm familiar with using word2vec to study semantic shifts, but I suspect this shift is too subtle for word2vec to pick up, and I don't know of any easy-to-use website for doing this analysis.)
- Somewhat relatedly, take a look at the google ngrams of "kindergarten teacher" vs "Kindergarten Teacher". There are two clear spikes when kindergarten teacher was almost always capitalized as Kindergarten Teacher:
- in the early 1900s (this is probably because it came from german and germans capitalize all nouns, not just proper nouns.
- in the year 2000; this is very curious to me. I hypothesize that this capitalization is due to wanting to emphasize the importance of the Kindergarten Teacher role, but it's not 100% clear to me why. I can create all sorts of just-so stories about the rise of feminism/helicopter parenting/credentialism/etc.
- Somewhat relatedly, take a look at the google ngrams of "kindergarten teacher" vs "Kindergarten Teacher". There are two clear spikes when kindergarten teacher was almost always capitalized as Kindergarten Teacher:
- It's curious to me that a German wrote the eggcorn "kindergarden" based on the American pronunciation of the word, when in both German and English the correct version is kindergarten (with a t instead of a d).
ICC is in the very early stages of developing a guideline on data centers. Nothing but a tentative outline has been published so far (in the "documents" on the linked page).
Data centers have existed for decades. If the ICC hasn't figured out how to handle data centers, then maybe they're really no as important as you suggest.
And clicking that link takes me to this description of the G12 guidelines. I did not think it possible to channel the pompous, verbose writing of an overconfident undergrad without sounding like chatgpt, but damn this committee nailed it.
The G12 Guideline on Data Centers provides a clear, comprehensive, and easy‑to‑navigate framework that aligns the most relevant code provisions for modern data center design and construction. As data centers evolve in scale, operational complexity, and criticality, this guideline brings together key requirements from multiple disciplines, electrical, mechanical, fire protection, structural, water efficiency, and more, into a single, cohesive resource tailored specifically to these unique facilities.
By integrating applicable codes and standards to highlight how they relate within the context of data center operations, G12 enhances understanding for building officials, designers, and developers. It offers a clear pathway for achieving safety, reliability, and sustainability in the built environment, supporting the development of data centers that meet today’s performance needs while preparing for tomorrow’s technological advancements.
I think of being a member of the WPK as being equivalent to citizenship in the US. Once you're a member of of the WPK, you get a "meaningful" vote, can get a passport, and get all the other legal benefits that we give to citizens.
One of the reasons I'm against serve-your-country-for-citizenship-starship-troopers-style is that North Korea style governance seems like the only possible end result.
My understanding is that voting in the DPRK happens as an "approval ballot" where ballots come pre-filled with a single name for every position. Voters can either cast their vote directly, or cross off one of the names before casting the vote. At least in theory, these %0.07 percent of votes that don't go to Kim represent voters who crossed of Kim's name before casting their ballot. There's defector testimony that these modified ballots go into a separate ballot box, and votes are cast simultaneously by everyone in your neighborhood, and so this is an obviously public act of defiance.
The real politics in the DPRK happens in determining who gets put on the ballot. The Worker's Party of Korea is in charge of preparing the ballots and selecting candidates. My understanding is that low-level candidates are determined by a process that would be viewed as more-or-less democratic by Western standards, you just have to be a member of the party to have a "vote" in the "primary" that determines who goes on the main ballot. About 10% of the population are members of the WPK. Being a member of the WPK is relatively prestigious socially and hard to do. I've mentioned here before that I used to teach in the DPRK, and I had a few students explicitly mentioned to me that their number 1 career goal was getting into the party.
There are two other legal political parties in North Korea, and they both get some number of seats in local and nation-level elections (maybe 5% between the two of them). The Chindoist Chongu Party is more or less an anti-Christian party, and the Korean Social Democratic Party is more or less what you'd guess from the title. They've historically had more independence than I would have naively guessed (which is not a lot---they are legally bound to be subservient to the WPK---but past party pamphlets would occasionally have remarks in them directly criticizing national level policies and human rights abuses). I never heard anyone talk about these parties while I was over there, though, and I have long wondered what type of person joins one of these parties instead of the WPK/how it affects their social standing.
The main way we know these things is by people going and visiting North Korea and interacting with "ordinary" North Koreans. But Trump in 2017 passed an executive order that Americans cannot travel there. I think this was a huge mistake because now we have even less insight into this already opaque country.
The equivalent right wing trope is the republican senator having gay sex in the airport bathroom stall.
It does seem weird that this didn't come out with the #metoo movement.
It's a defect of this forum only in the sense that I trust the people in this forum more than I do of other forums. So when someone bullshits a factoid, I am much more likely to believe them.
I'm curious how many "facts" like this go stated and uncorrected on themotte here. I suspect it's common enough to meaningfully distort my worldview :(
That is, the exchange of political tutelege for sexual gratification is fundamentally illegitimate. ... Meanwhile, the exchange of labor for money is inherent to... reality.
This sounds entirely post-hoc justified to me. Every primeape understood the exchange of sex for favors long before homo sapiens invented money.
In your post, you just define "exploitation" to be what the standard capitalist thinks exploitation should mean. The fact that you have a different intuition than Marx does not mean deception is the point. The Marxists could (and did/do!) accuse capitalists of all the same critiques you are leveling at Marxists and their critiques are equally valid.
For example:
If both parties are profiting and are glad for the presence of the other party, then neither is being exploited.
The obvious counterexample to this claim would be the Roman practice of molesting young boys. Both parties here profited from the exchange (the elder statesman receiving sexual gratification and the young boy receiving political tutelage), both entered into the practice willingly, but up-to-lizardman's-constant, every modern American considers this to be exploitation.
So it seems to me you are redefining the term exploitation away from its common-sense meaning into a technical one to perform the exact same motte-and-bailey you accuse the Marxists of.
- Prev
- Next

I find your comment nonsensical.
You don't consider the bible "literature"?
The elite of both the red and blue tribe are well read, they just read different things and want to be known for reading different things. OP has good examples of blue-tribe reading, so here's some examples of red-tribe coded reading: the Bible, ancient greek plays, Shakepseare, John Locke, Federalist Papers, Heinlein, Tom Clancy, Little House on the Prairy.
More options
Context Copy link