site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1mo ago (text post)   866 thread views

Transnational Thursday for March 5, 2026

Transnational Thursday is a thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or international relations history. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Advocacy organization CANZUK International has just published a "public opinion analysis" claiming that support for "alliance with the goal of establishing a multilateral free trade agreement and reciprocal mobility arrangements for citizens" is around 70 percent in the four affected countries. In percentage points:

CountrySupportUnsureOpposeMargin of error (±)
Canada7212163
Australia6813193
New Zealand757184
UKGBNI708223

However, if you scroll down to the methodology section:

The figures and insights presented in this report are based on a comprehensive digital sentiment analysis of public discourse from February 1st to 28th, 2026.

This methodology synthesises weighted favourability signals from existing polls, media sentiment analysis, and the volume and tone of engagement on digital platforms (including social media comments, likes, shares, news articles, op-eds, and informal polls) authored by or targeted at residents of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

This is one of many legitimate ways to measure public opinion. Traditional probability-based polling (e.g., random-digit-dial telephone surveys or stratified online panels) remains the established benchmark for statistical representativeness. No polling, survey, or opinion analysis methodology—traditional or modern—is 100% accurate.

All approaches involve inherent limitations related to sampling, timing, question wording, response bias, and real-world events. The goal of any responsible poll, survey or opinion analysis is to provide the clearest possible snapshot of sentiment at a given moment, not a perfect prediction.

By combining the strengths of big-data scale and cutting-edge AI with full transparency about its constraints, this methodology offers a valuable, contemporary complement to traditional polling. It is designed to illuminate prevailing public sentiment and the reasons behind it, helping inform policy and public debate in an increasingly digital world.

CANZUK International welcomes independent scrutiny and encourages cross-verification with probability-based polling for the most complete understanding.

This sounds pretty weasely. But, to be fair, the authors did include "strengths" and "limitations" sections between those two quotes.

Quick strawpoll to gauge the level of background knowledge for the Iran conflict.

Except the current clusterfuck has nothing to do with the question. It is a bit like saying that Poland and Russia hate each other because of the Schism of 1054

But then, your own politicians assert that 2000+ year old literature has everything to do with the question...

I mean, if you go with Putin's explanations on that Tucker Carlson interview...

This seems like a decent question in the context of a 20 question quiz. But if you're going to pick only 1 question there's lots of better ones. Off the top of my head: Who deposed the Shah? How many casualties in the Iran-Iraq war?

I figured it was probably the sunni/shiite schism, but I answered no because I wasn't sure.

Same here.

I'm honestly sure I read about this at some point (did a bit of a deep dive on early Muslim history a year or two ago), but I couldn't for the life of me remember that one.

If I was more confident in my ignorance, I'd say that I absolutely did know what happened in Karbala in 680- obviously the Battle of the Camel (different people, different location, prior Fitna/ Islamic civil war).

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats