A majority of the single young women seem to enjoy going out a few times per month and find a new person to have sex with. The one pushing for a relationship is usually the man.
How could women's nature have changed SO quickly? It was nearly a hundred percent the other way around just twenty years ago.
Smartphones have made sitting in traffic or waiting at the DMV for 2 hours much more tolerable. I wonder sometimes if more progress would have been made on these workaday inconveniences if smart phones hadn't been invented.
Freddie de Boer being a major exception. He's worth like 50 readers alone.
I don't care how many times someone asks me if I want to eat pieces of shit for breakfast. I'd say no every time.
Why did it ever eventually win?
Murphy's "it just feels in my gut wrong" isn't going to cut it. It can supplement it though. And you say "pretended to be doing," but it's just weak empiricism, not a total absence. It's cursory and vaguely suggestive, which counts for something. Scattershot qualitative impressions are in a similar boat.
Lots of the creativity of the 70s came out of super-cheap housing in cities and a dole system that didn't ask too many questions,
Maybe you're talking past each other. The other commenter is talking about singularly spectacular artists, whereas what you mention here cultivates "scenes" and creative group endeavors.
But Murphy came with no empirical evidence whatsoever. And there was more to the discussion than that.
Right. Having to pay for a simulacrum of a conversation they wish they were having with a badass power couple wifey just feels patronizing.
pseudo-intellectual
What's pseudo about it? She's genuinely an intellectual. In fact she bested Meghan Murphy in their debate over porn and sex work on Benjamin Boyce's podcast a few years ago. I remain more on Team Murphy, but she lost that battle.
Anyway, maybe it's just me being jaded and experienced, but I don't see the value in spending so much on these women. They're still just meat sacs after all, they don't warrant such money being spent on them. There's no way they are so differentiated from some other attractive, smart woman that they should command these prices. Do they come with some state-of-the-art virtual reality experience that enhances the encounter, Strange Days-style?
I'd like to see a profile on the guys paying for these women. That would be more illuminating. If they're twenty-something rich, nerdy Asian guys, that would track. If not, I'd have to revisit my murky thesis. These men might too be enchanted by the aesthetic of it all, just like some of the women who will see the article and especially the photo that comes with it. "I'm with this high-end escort like I'm in some Mission Impossible movie or something. It's a cool story I'm in. The people looking at me from across the hotel bar don't know she's an escort, anyway. They may think she's with me organically, and that we're a power couple out here slaying."
Maybe it means vaccine went from "get it and you won't get X" to "get it and it reduces your chances of getting X somewhat"
In discussion of Graham Platner today on Breaking Points, Platner is given kudos for claiming he was a bad boyfriend in the past, but that the current accusations against him and nebulous and thin gruel. Points to them for not falling back on Believe All Women (even if because the worst complaint against him is from a Republican who dated him, so it's thought to be motivated), but it occurred to me how unlikely it would ever to for a woman to feel the need to 'fess up to being "a bad girlfriend" and atoning for it, for a political career. It'd be like, "Psh, yea I was a BRAT, and anyway who said I was a bad girlfriend? Probably some douchebag who thought he was owed sex."
I saw a post on YouTube from "Stipey UK" and it didn't look very peaceful. People encircling police and throwing trash cans at them, light property damage to residents.
there's a little bit of desert environment yea
oh, a rattling train does change things. I haven't seen it in ages.
Wow. If we were in a bar I would demand some more details. Unless your expression was telling me don't.
I thought the movie took place in Seattle. That would explain the rain and even the desert at the end. Eastern part of the state has some.
Why doesn't he just get the tattoo removed? Hesitancy to do that is the thing that should be disqualifying. Now that he certainly DOES know.
A straight guy around women and gay guys is the lamest. The only thing that saves you is the gay guy being flirty, which may induce interest toward you by the woman.
I know from experience. Well, that is to say, if you can get tired of an 8, there's no reason you wouldn't get tired of a 9. It's on a spectrum. I don't think experience "gets over a hump" so to speak at which point you're fine with the same person forever.
This is a common misperception, that a guy with an attractive wouldn't get tired of sex with her. Not so. Men with a 9 will mess with 5s just to keep things interesting.
"Show me a hot woman, and I'll show you a man who's tired of f***** her"
What happened with that notion. I'm pretty sure once the 90s arrived James Cameron DID win awards with CGI. Terminator 2 iirc
I've wondered about the reception of AI art compared to hip hop in the 80s. Similar claims were made then, about plagiarism, the dilution of musical art, electronic instruments merely aping the real thing etc. I think what's different this time, or why the democratization idea doesn't go far, is because AI is a development given to us by a small number of wealthy nerds, and deeply corporate. Hip hop was DIY, and welled up from poor neighborhoods populated by people who are considered the antithesis of nerds.
If you’re in a museum looking at, let’s say, Palaeolithic stone axes, you might feel certain emotions or a sense of connection to humanity’s distant past. Then if you learned the collection was made by a boomer in the 90s in the Palaeolithic style, you’d be disappointed, regardless of whether the axes looked “good” or not, since they’re literally just crude chipped stones with hardly any aesthetic values on their own.
You thought you were looking at legitimately ancient stone axes, but discover they're fake. That has nothing to do with the visual impression of the axes in an artistic way. This is orthogonal to the labor theory of value wrt to AI art though. The boomer making the replica may very well work twice as hard at it than the stone age man. It's still worse. Its value is lower, despite the labor.
- Prev
- Next

Isn't women's "base" instinct to not sleep around, and to want a relationship? That's what evolution tells us. Wanting to live like a man is the more difficult thing for a woman to do, as it goes against their nature (i.e. base instincts).
More options
Context Copy link