Rothfuchs
15hr ago
Where other political movements use violence, feminists lie. They lie instead of doing violence because they are women, and not men. And feminists lie a lot. Probably because they are an illegitimate political movement; there are no facts that back any aspect of feminism, so they can never legitimately win over the public. They're like gender bolsheviks. They would be extremely violent, because they are wrong about everything and are really just a nasty movement for nasty people. But they're women, so they're extremely deceitful instead. That means that by reasoning or arguing or listening to feminism or feminists, you already lost. Your aims would be better served by writing a book for men and normal women which demonstrates what I've said here, so that they are less susceptible to feminist manipulation going forward. Feminists will simply lie about your book and throw it away when they immediately detect that it does not serve their aims.
MeToo was probably a mix of cohort effects and the effects of technology. It used laws which existed in the 90s, but was bolstered by the internet's power to bring together women to make accusations against men all at once. It also relied on an ample supply of feminists, which the MeToo generation supplied more sufficiently than previous generations. Debauchery at Woodstock 2 would have been way harder to prosecute than today because nobody had smart phones. Most people probably didn't even have cell phones. There are few to no recordings of what went on, nobody got "their rapist's" snapchat and exchanged instant messages, police might struggle to prove an accused man even attended, without the easy investigative tool of phone location records.
In my culture, heterosexual friendship is seen as inappropriate, and men would never go to a swing class looking for a wife or a woman. We also have a TFR above 2, so I guess my culture will be everyone's culture in the future. It sounds like you are describing a different species to me.
More options
Context Copy link