Rov_Scam
11hr ago
Force majeure is pretty rare and reserved for exceptional circumstances, not that they don't want to pay on a policy. If that's the case, they'll usually find another reason not to pay.
Rov_Scam
23hr ago
You're entitled to your opinions on the ACLU, but they have very little to do with this case, other than that they're paying the attorney who handled it. Their participation is incidental, and if it wasn't for their public profile, would be entirely unknown. News coverage of high-profile lawsuits rarely mentions the insurance companies that are actually paying for them.
If they set themselves up as legal gambling companies, they wouldn't have as much of a problem. But they don't want to deal with the regulation, which includes being banned in a lot of states, including some big ones, so it's worth it for them in the short term to insist that they're in some vague category that can't be regulated and do the minimum to appease the people who have the power to sic attorneys general on them. If they can stay out of the headlines it's better for business.
More options
Context Copy link