SecureSignals
No bio...
User ID: 853
It actually doesn't seem like that at all, it literally seems like Israeli agents acquiring property to make sure American Media is pro-Israel and pro-Jewish. You can't say "oh they just want to waste their money on clout" to explain Bari Weiss being installed at CBS New, or the political sequence of events that led TikTok algorithm into falling in the lap of Ellison (hundreds of Jewish lobbies lobby for the TikTok ban because TikTok is antisemitic, then the ban happens and Ellison gets the algorithm, that's not "bored billionaires")- which Netanyahu directly identified as the most important development in Israel's eighth-front war. That's not "bored billionaires trying to buy everything" it's something else.
ADL chief Jonathan Greenblatt was heard on leaked call demanding something must be done about TikTok due to declining support for Israel among young people, hundreds of Jewish organizations throw their weight behind a Tik Tok ban, a week ago Time publishes in article by Anthony Goldbloom titled Why TikTok Needs to be Sold or Banned Before the 2024 Election which hardly mentions anything about some national security threat from CCP, and instead under the heading "Why it Matters" complains about the portion of pro-Palestinian hashtags on the platform and the spread of antisemitism...
TikTok says users decide whether to post and engage with content on #FreePalestine rather than #StandWithIsrael. But, content moderation decides what posts stay up, what gets taken down, and what accounts get banned from the platform. And it’s TikTok’s algorithm that decides what circulates and what doesn’t.
For anyone who doubts the causal link between TikTok and the rise in antisemitic incidents we’ve seen on U.S. campuses: a November 2023 study conducted by Generation Lab, which I helped to organize, showed that people who spend 30 minutes per day on TikTok are 17% more likely to agree with anti-semitic statements like "Jewish people chase money more than other people do."
They want control over the moderation and algo, as ADL has control over the moderation of Reddit and nearly every platform except X only since Musk's takeover.
Netflix ditches deal for Warner Bros. Discovery after Paramount’s offer is deemed superior
In a development that was predicted by many, Paramount Skydance owned by the Ellison family has derailed the Netflix acquisition of Warner Bros and will acquire the company.
The Ellison family are close, long-time personal friends and business partners with Netanyahu. For example, in 2020 Haaretz reported that Ellison intervened to secure a lawyer to represent Netanyahu in his corruption case. In 2021 Larry Ellison offered Netanyahu a paid role on Oracle’s board. Larry Ellison has widely been described as the largest private donor to the IDF.
With Paramount Skydance now poised to acquire Warner Bros, here is an incomplete list of the properties that now have or will shortly come under ownership of the Ellison Family.
August 2025- Hostile takeover of Paramount:
- Paramount Pictures
- Paramount Television
- CBS
- CBS News
- CBS Sports
- Nickelodeon
- MTV
- BET
- Comedy Central
- Showtime
- Paramount+
We saw the immediate fallout from the Ellison family acquisition of CBS News with the installation of Bari Weiss to lead the editorial direction of the company.
Only last month in January 2036 the TikTok algorithm came under the ownership and control of Ellison-owned Oracle, so for practical purposes TikTok should be added to this list:
- TikTok
Now with the impending takeover by Paramount of Warner Bros, these properties will come under the control of the Ellison family:
- Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group
- CNN / CNN International
- HBO / HBO Max
- Discovery+
- Discovery Channel
- DC/DC Studios
- TLC
- TNT
- TBS
- Turner Classic Movies (TCM)
- Animal Planet
- Science Channel
- Travel Channel
- American Heroes Channel (formerly the Military Channel)
- Cartoon Network / AdultSwim
This is the consolidation of American Media under the Ellison family in just sixth months.
Netanyahu has described International Media as the "eighth front" of Israel's wars, it is wildly intolerable to me that the Trump Administration would permit the consolidation of this breadth of news media into a family with foreign loyalties and foreign ties. The reforms at CBS News and elevation of Bari Weiss also prove a political motive and intent to fight this Eighth Front defined by Netanyahu, which is a front Israel is fighting against the minds of the American People.
At what point do "conspiracies" stop becoming conspiracies and start just becoming recognized as plain reality? All the "conspiracy theorists" predicted from the beginning the TikTok algorithm would be handed to an apparatus loyal to Israel, and that Paramount Skydance would not allow Netflix to win Warner Bros, because they are fighting a geopolitical war and not optimizing dollars and cents.
All of this while the United States mobilizes to fight another war for Israel... but deporting Somalis from Minnesota is just impossible we are told.
There's enough symbolism involving wine in the Old Testament, like with Melchizedek, the fact that other surrounding pantheons had gods of wine isn't surprising.
They had a god of wine who took human form and visits Thebes claiming to be the son of Zeus, performs miracles, but is rejected by the King who is then torn asunder for denial of the son's divinity.
The NT has a god who takes human form, turns water into wine, visits Jerusalem claiming to be son of Yahweh, gets rejected by the pharisees, and the divine punishment of the pharisees is prophesized in the parables. It's more than an incidental similarity.
In the Bacchae Dionysus escapes prison through a divinely summoned earthquake, in Acts Paul and Silas escape prison from a divinely summoned earthquake, and Jesus's resurrection is associated with a divine earthquake in which Jesus escapes from his tomb.
Ancient Dionysian rites entailed followers consuming the essence of their god:
The wine they drank was for them potent with divine power--it was the god himself, and the very quintessence of divine life was resident in the juice of the grape. This the devotees of Bacchus knew as a matter of personal experience when, after drinking the wine, they felt a strange new life within themselves. That was the life and power of their god. Their enthusiasm was quite literally a matter of having the god within themselves, of being full of and completely possessed by the god. So they themselves described it in their own language (entheos, enthusiasm). They might be intoxicated; but they felt themselves possessed by the god. The drinking of wine in the service of Dionysus was for them a religious sacrament... So Euripides could say that he who knows the Dionysian mysteries "is pure in life, and revelling on the mountains, has the Bacchic communion in his soul."
The devotees of Dionysus had other realistic means of attaining to communion with their god. They had a sacrament of eating as well as a sacrament of drinking. This rite was the "feast of raw flesh." To be an initiate into the mysteries of Dionysus one must be able to avow... "I have .... Fulfilled his red and bleeding feasts."
I assume Jesus was more familiar with Isaiah than Dionysus in his earthly life.
The entire NT was originally written in Greek, I would assume the writers were familiar with myths from the Greek Dionysia.
Acts 4:12 says that there is no salvation except through Jesus. In Genesis God tells Abraham that He has made him "a father of many nations." Gentiles are also children of Abraham.
Esau was a child of Abraham, and his divine inheritance was swindled by Jacob. The early Rabbis associated the descendants of Esau with the nation of Rome.
SecureSignals
3d ago
I wouldn't say Vatican II muddied the waters as much as it did establish dual path to salvation, not providing any logical justification other than "it's a divine mystery why the Jews are saved in spite of Jesus's words." And many Catholics are simply in denial of the new Church doctrine.
SecureSignals
3d ago
Jesus's parable of the rejection of the son of god is playing on preexisting themes from ancient Greek theater. Here is wikipedia's summary of Euripides The Bacchae (405 BC):
The tragedy recounts the Greek myth of King Pentheus of Thebes and his mother Agave, who were punished by the god Dionysus (who is Pentheus's cousin) for rejecting his cult. The play opens with Dionysus proclaiming that he has arrived in Thebes with his votaries to avenge the slander, repeated by his aunts, that he is not the son of Zeus. Disguised as a foreign holy man, the god intends to introduce Dionysian rites into the city, but the Thebans reject his divinity and king Pentheus orders his arrest.
Eventually, Dionysus drives Pentheus insane, luring him to the mountains. The play ends with the women of Thebes, driven by Dionysus's orgiastic frenzy, tearing Pentheus apart, while his mother Agave bears his head on a thyrsus to her father Cadmus
So the son of Zeus appears as man as a character in the play, tries to introduce Dionysian rites into the city, gets his divinity rejected by the local elite, the elite get slaughtered by intoxicated female cult-followers. Dionysus was the god of wine, and Jesus's first miracle is turning water into wine.
Jesus said He came to fulfill the law. When something is fulfilled, is it still happening or is it over?
Two months ago, Israel hosted an "army" of 1,000 pastors to "Support Israel, Combat Antisemitism". CBN News provided some coverage/summary in a short 4 minute video.
The Christian Broadcasting Network was founded by Pat Roberson, and their channel has 2.7 million subscribers.
The whole video is worth a watch, because if you watch the video you will see the core theme, the message being sent to the pastors, is that God does not renege on his promises. Esoterically that sends the signals to the pastors that they owe their allegiance to Israel. But the CBN anchor also emphasizes that as a takeaway in his short monologue summary of the "lessons" from this summit:
God keeps his covenant, and as Christians we need to recognize that the covenant with Abraham and Moses continues on to this day. He does not change, he is the Lord, he changes not. When he promises something, when he makes a covenant, he fully intends to keep it until that day. Now as a Christian I really enjoy the New Covenant, it was a covenant that was made with the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, but I have to recognize Christianity is a Jewish religion and Jesus was Jewish, and the New Testament was predominantly written by Jews who came to realize that Jesus was the Messiah.
... Paul states plainly that all Israel will be saved. Why? Because God keeps his promise.
Although the emphasis is distinctly evangelical, the actual message is consistent with Catholic Doctrine as well.
The New Law did not abolish the old covenants, it was a practical set of compromises to enable the diffusion of Christianity created by Paul, not Jesus.
SecureSignals
3d ago
Different people different circumstances. IIRC it was Paul who even said that Christians could eat meat that was sacrificed as a pagan offering. I'm pretty sure my auntie would have a heart attack if I served her steak from a cow that was sacrificed to Jupiter, but there was a practical motivation for this new set of rules, which came from Paul and not Jesus (Paul never met Jesus, except in a vision).
The New Law was an optimization for cultural diffusion of Christianity in Pagan Rome, and the rules provide enough leeway to have made it happen. Paul made Christianity as much as Jesus.
SecureSignals
4d ago
Which branch of Christianity professes this? Not Catholicism, certainly not Protestantism. They believe the NT extended salvation, not that the nation of Israel was abolished or that the Gentiles are now among the nation of Israel.
Even if some Christian believes that, just imaging the cognitive dissonance: "I don't like or support Israel because they are claiming to be Israel but are not, I am Israel now, I am the real Jew- not Netanyahu." Even if you believed that, you are just operating in this little universe that shrouds your perception of what is going on here.
In Genesis God promises Abraham, "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse".
Both Huckabee and Carlson believe Yahweh made this promise, but only Christian Zionists take this seriously. How could you believe in the bible and not take that seriously? Carlson says "Oh I, uh, don't curse Israel because Gold told me not too, I just don't think Netanyahu is a real Jew or Israel is the Israel mentioned by God." He is pigeon-holed into this anti-semitic canards that don't get to the truth of it: that is hostile foreign propaganda-myth, it's not true. Don't believe it, because if you believe it you are being manipulated into doing someone else's bidding for their own benefit and not yours. Huckabee and Ted Cruz believe it, Carlson believes it but he just suffers cognitive dissonance trying to square it with his own newfound antisemitism.
SecureSignals
4d ago
Ethnography and theology are two sides of the same coin, as are myth and ethnogenesis. They are tokens that influence the genetic evolution of the tribe.
Are you really saying that ancient Jews did not believe in the literal existence of God
Yes the vast majority of them did believe the stories, but the ones creating the stories had political motives. There is a distinction to be made between believing the myths and believing the myths. Does Netanyahu literally believe them? Or does he believe in them insofar as he identifies with them and uses them to organize a people to attain geopolitical objectives? It doesn't really matter what Netanyahu believes, he is a product of those myths and he is using them to change the world, and those same myths are indispensable in ensuring the loyalty of foreigners like Huckabee and Ted Cruz: people who are supposed to represent me by the way, but they do not- the bible tells them to be loyal to Israel it doesn't tell them to be loyal to me and mine.
You are making a pretty weird claim here, and one that doesn't seem necessary to the rest of your point at all
It is necessary for my point, because people just dismiss Huckabee as being some outlier that provides an incidental justification for a "straw man", rather than Huckabee's loyalty to Israel being a feature, not a bug of Christianity. And Carlson's opposition, also rooted in Christianity, is forced to accept the same fictional truths Huckabee uses to justify his perspective. How can Christians debate this if they agree God promised them the land?
SecureSignals
4d ago
The Old Law: if you don't properly worship Yahweh (symbolically representative of Jews) you are cursed. And if you do properly worship Yahweh (Jews) you will be blessed. I can hear my own political representatives restate that framework to curse their own race and nation for turning against Israel.
SecureSignals
4d ago
Christians claim thew New Law represents the "completion" of the Old Law. But no branch of Christianity claims the New Law supplanted the Mosaic covenant. Jesus himself said he did not come to abolish the law, and Christian doctrine is that the First Covenant is living and they are outside of it.
The New Law actually was a practical mechanism for bringing Gentiles in the fold of Yahweh. Conversion would be quite difficult if you demanded they get circumcised and are unable to eat their traditional diet or at the tables of their pagan neighbors. It was Paul's innovation of the New Law that allowed Christianity to flourish.
But Christians believe in the Mosaic Covenant and the Abrahamic covenant. Huckabee is the one that treats these seriously, Carlson is the one that doesn't present a coherent position rooted in the bible and instead just balks.
SecureSignals
4d ago
And how exactly is Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz droning on about "Those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed" contrary to Leviticus?
The 26th chapter of Leviticus is laying out the same framework for the Mosaic Covenant, which is a genetically-inherited blood covenant between the Jews and Yahweh. I am not aware of any Christian sect that claims this covenant does not or no longer exists- I've seen anti-Semitic Catholics claim that Jesus broke the Mosaic covenant, but that's contrary to their own Church teachings.
The Mosaic covenant is one of the most stark "main characters of history" assertions in the body of human mythological canon, and it's remarkable that billions of non-Jews hold it as true. That has real-world consequences, like when we are faced with actual life and death geopolitical standoff we have two Christians debating Genesis.
You even undersell the depth of Jonathan Pollard's betrayal, who was one of the most damaging spies in US history. Pollard's professed motive was that he believed the US wasn't doing enough for Israel. Huckabee meeting with Pollard is a feature not a bug, as Huckabee's worship of Jews is the fundamental job requirement for his US government position.
The most unfortunate part is that what you call the "strawman" of Christian Zionism is actually the only internally coherent position a Christian can hold... like, don't you believe the Bible is divinely and literally true? It's a fatal flaw in the Christian blockchain that the Torah really does reduce to race worship of Jews symbolically represented by their tribal god Yahweh, like Zeus was a tribal god representing the European tribes worshipped by him. I don't see how you could believe the Old Testament and also not agree with Huckabee's perspective.
I understand where HUCKABEE is coming from, it's Tucker Carlson who pussyfoots without saying what he actually means. Is Carlson saying that Yahweh did not promise the land to the Jews? Or is he saying that Yahweh did, but for diplomatic reasons we shouldn't acknowledge it? Why doesn't Carlson then just say "I agree with you but we shouldn't say it out loud because it's not politically expedient", why act shocked if he believes it as well? The best I can infer is that Carlson is saying Yahweh did promise the land to the Jews but the Israelis are not Jews- although he does not say that directly, he makes the argument indirectly by saying "Netanyahu came from Europe."
Carlson incessantly says we can't criticize Jews collectively for their collective behavior, but his approach to antisemitism is a critique of literature he himself claims to hold is true.
I grew up Christian, I understand well the dynamics and how going to a Catholic church is not even close to the same as a sermon from Mike Huckabee. But are you really equipped to challenge Huckabee when he clearly has the bible on his side and you believe the bible as well?
The real problem is that your "strawman" of Christian Zionism is internally coherent within Christianity, and it's actually the Christian antisemitism professed by Carlson that's incoherent.
With that said, for all of Carlson's denials that he is antisemitic he has put himself in a very dangerous position, he has put himself squarely in that camp and none of his meager qualifications or groveling "I hate Rome too because they killed Jews, I'm not antisemitic!" is going to work. I don't understand Carlson's motives. He is either Red Pilled and trying to subversively promote anti-semitism or he's just trying to gain market share from the surge in anti-semitism among young audiences. If it's the latter he's going to have a Come to Jesus moment very soon, if it's the former then he's just demonstrating how Christianity is a blocker from properly engaging that tribe.
Yahweh didn't promise anything to the Jews, Yahweh is literary fiction- ancient capeshit, and the bible is Jewish race propaganda. That's a hard pill to swallow as a long time former Christian myself, but watching the "Carlson vs Huckabee dialectic" on the eve of another major war for Israel just shows how the Christian perspective is unable to grapple with the forces we are dealing with, it is captured by the Torah on both the anti-semitic and philo-semitic side of the debate.
SecureSignals
10d ago
Biological evolution is not too slow. The Roman Empire was created in more than two generations and it declined over many generations. Biological evolution inarguably happened during the Black Death. Biological Evolution of what an "American" is is happening in 2 generations.
The most specific is the claim that the change in population after the collapse of Rome was dysgenic
You have that backwards.
Latin warlords conquer Italian Peninsula: "Hard Times" that create good men (From frame A towards B, essentially genetic replacement of Early European Farmers with Indo European colonizers).
Genetic Changes during Imperial Rome: "Good times" that create weak men (From From B to Frame C). Decadence, dysgenic cultural practices enabled by prosperity: fertility decline, population replacement, decay of noble status and lineage. Huge genetic shift in the population.
Late Antiquity: "Weak mean create hard times" - From Frame C to D and onwards, imperial Rome collapsing and being genetically cleansed by the barbarians.
Medieval and Early Modern: "Hard times create good men": Genetic changes from Imperial Rome are reversed, genetic foundation for the next phases of European culture.
Yeah. It's a tradeoff. What would you rather have, a genetic resistance to Y. Pestis that is far from perfect, and obsolete with the age of antibiotics, or elevated risk of Crohn's disease, which is chronic and lifelong?
The question is what would I have preferred my ancestor to have had who was actually living in that time and place? Obviously I'm still here, meaning all my ancestors survived all that war and disease to reproduce. If they did not have that variant there's a higher likelihood I am not here.
They were doing just fine before being exposed to alien pathogens
They were doing just fine until.... they met other people. That's a great evolutionary strategy. They didn't have to survive those apocalyptic diseases like Europeans did, and they melted on first contact with the outside world.
The wealthy also had the luxury of flight in the face of the plague. They also, yes, probably have better genes for physical and mental health overall, but probably not to that drastic an extent.
Yes they did, and I am saying that was a selection pressure, as ugly as it is to say. The overall quality of the survivors is higher than the population before the event. That is the definition of eugenic.
It is a very good thing we have options these days, like gene therapy as I've mentioned previously. We do not need war and disease to trim the herd, it's a horribly crude solution at best.
I feel like you are refusing to understand what I am trying to say. I am not trying to say "war and apocalyptic diseases are good options today to improve society." I'm saying very real selection effects from these high-mortality events lend credence to the "hard times create strong men" meme and "good times create weak men" adage, but do not guarantee that a people living in a miserable situation will always become better for it. "Hard times" are often, but not always, associated with major historical genetic changes. In the case with Rome the genetic changes follow the cycle well from end-to-end: Latin tribal upstarts raise hell on the Italian peninsula, create strong imperial genetic stock and Civilization. Civilizational success leads to decadence: importing slaves from all over the world, population replacement, decay of Noble status and lineage. Decadence creates stagnation and decline. Decline creates a genetic cleansing event that creates the modern European/Italian and progresses to the Middle Ages, where these cycles of pressure continue until we are here today.
Are you aware of the fact that the same genes that convey resistance to the Black Plague also cause increased risk of autoimmune disease?
Are you aware those genes don't simply convey resistance to the Black Plague, they provide more generalized resistance against lethal infectious diseases?:
These results suggest that the Black Death influenced the evolution of the human immune system. “When a pandemic of this nature—killing 30 to 50% of the population—occurs, there is bound to be selection for protective alleles in humans,” Poinar says. “Even a slight advantage means the difference between surviving or passing. Of course, those survivors who are of breeding age will pass on their genes.”
And recall the Native Americans were devastated by diseases for which Europeans had developed immunity. It provided a strong genetic advantage.
The Black Plague certainly impacted all classes of people, but the poor masses were hit harder, which yes would be another selection effect suggesting eugenic pressure. Higher immunity among higher social classes is observed even today.
Scholars cite the pressures created by the Black Plague on the Catholic Church as being decisive in the Protestant Reformation in Europe, and in the breakdown of feudalism in England towards the manorial economic system which then gave way to the market system.
I already cited the genetic trajectory of Rome (genetic decline -> civilizational decline), granted that bakes in the assumption that population replacement from North Africa was dysgenic, and the subsequent correction towards Northern Europe was eugenic. But it did happen that way.
War, starvation and apocalyptic disease are terrible ways to go about it.
If you took away war, starvation, and apocalyptic disease from our evolutionary timeline we would be devolved and unrecognizable and not human. Not saying I support all those things, but the eugenic effects of these sorts of pressures: war, disease, etc. lends credence to the "hard times create strong men" meme, but it's not always true. The pressure has to be eugenic in nature to ring true. Somalis living in a shithole isn't going to make better Somalis unless there's a eugenic selection effect. "Hard times" that are also dysgenic do not make good men.
Decadence is the cultural conditions enabled by prosperity that cause dysgenics. Hard times can be, but are not always, eugenic. The Black Death, the high mortality during the Middle Ages, the violent organization of the early Roman Republic all served eugenic functions- even the collapse of the Roman Empire served an important eugenic function. "Hard times create strong men" is a nod to the eugenic function of growth and the dysgenic effects upon realization, stagnation, and ultimate decline. Goethe:
The Godhead is effective in the living and not in the dead, in the becoming and the changing, not in the become and the set-fast; and therefore, similarly, the reason is concerned only to strive towards the divine through the becoming and the living, and the understanding only to make use of the become and the set-fast.
You can see the full "Hard times create good men, good men create week men" cycle in the genetic evolution of the Roman Empire, with the collapse of the Roman Empire forming an important eugenic function reversing the dysgenic effects of late Roman decadence.
I am very skeptical, and I generally agree with @2rafa's criticisms on there being no smoking gun for the most salacious accusations, just an (increasingly abundant) amount of suggestion and innuendo. Especially since I do believe in similar heterodox views, very hesitant to put much weight on a really outlandish claim. With that said these are probably the five strongest pieces of evidence I am aware of for the claim Epstein is still alive:
- Suicide weapon not identified, I am not a forensic expert. It seems unusual to me that they could not identify the noose used for the job since to apply the requisite amount of force necessary for a suicide would seem to leave identifiable forensic traces (skin cells, worn fabric, etc.) but I'm not an expert so maybe it's more difficult than I think even when all the evidence is conveniently sitting in a single small room.
- Witness account: Allegedly hours before Epstein's suicide was even announced (can't independently confirm that), someone posted on 4chan claiming to have worked at the prison facility and having witnessed a body swap. Normally I would attribute no weight to that, but the Epstein files showed the FBI investigated that 4chan poster and identified him as someone who was an actual MCC prison guard... the recency of that account (before wild theories about body swaps that could have influenced the perception of a bystander) adds weight, but ultimately witness testimony is highly unreliably especially in chaotic and unusual situations like this. Maybe the FBI ID'd the wrong person, maybe that person wasn't even on shift or something. Camera malfunctions add some weight here though.
- Recent Photograph in Tel Aviv: Alleged, recent photograph of someone who does look quite like Epstein in Tel Aviv. There are two versions of that photograph, one of which is more expanded and bears the Gemini watermark on the bottom right, but I myself saw that version appear later than the initial "cropped" version. If it were an authentic photograph, reprocessing it with AI and claiming the authentic photograph is a crop of the forgery would be an easy and effective way to sow doubt.
- Photograph of the body being brought out of MCC prison: Some suggest the facial features of that body do not match Epstein. I see all the time though that people don't understand faces can look very different in photographs depending on a huge number of factors, although I can also see the difference in the features between the two people that people call out (mostly nose and ears).
- Activity on gaming accounts associated with him: He's a confirmed gamer from the file drop (he was banned from Xbox live). That specific account on Fortnite is definitely associated with him and shows recent activity (even geolocates in Israel IIRC). Account was privated when people started talking about it (understandable even if he weren't the actual player) and removed from Internet Archive (not sure how unusual that is). This could be explained by somebody hacking his account, or someone else using his login or playing on a console that is authenticated under his account.
Tentative conclusion: Maybe 5% chance, I hesitate to give larger confidence to the theory because it's not something I would want to be wrong about, I have no need for it to be true to really change my opinions of the overall situation. Definitely enough there though for people to plausibly ask questions and these points should be investigated to increase public trust in the face of warranted public distrust.
Edit: Fortnite responds, was a name change by a user: https://x.com/FortniteStatus/status/2019817972831780952 - More than plausible explanation.
Edit 2: Polymarket also currently gives 5% chance, didn't see that before nice: https://polymarket.com/event/is-jeffrey-epstein-alive-498
SecureSignals
28d ago
Epstein also cited TRS in reference to B/W IQ gap, greatest ally after all???
SecureSignals
1mo ago
Yes, they need better uniforms, they need more funding and equipment, they need more numbers and while they are at it they need to roll through American cities and pick up vagrants and put them in humanitarian facilities away from society. There's a lot of things they should do but we can't because it genuinely is Nazi-adjacent, and being Nazi-adjacent is the worst thing in the world because of the Gas Chamber story. That's really it, it's a historical myth that disarms us from self-protection because if we engage in that to any real degree it's evil because of the Holocaust.
If they did have better uniforms it would just provoke more violent resistance. Looking like DEA-lite is probably the best balance given the real-world constraints, obviously it is not ideal. But yeah, they are knocking on doors to find and deport people, just like the Nazis did. That is an accurate comparison, but that isn't an indictment on their mission as much as it is an indictment our finely-tuned sensitivities we have been culturally trained with our entire lives. That is the major obstacle.
Where do you think the animosity from Iran and its urgency to have a nuclear deterrent fomes from? It comes from Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, all locations in which the US and Israel directly flexed hard military power to achieve regime change on behalf of Israel's geopolitical objectives. Iran has only made it this far because if its missile deterrent.
Israel has been hostile and aggressive against all of its regional neighbors and used the US for its dirty work, and it's a shock that makes an enemy of Iran? It's one of the steep costs of this pseudo-alliance with Israel, which is not an alliance at all. It's subversive and always has been.
The notion that Turkey has 10 times more domination of those neighbors than Israel, who is actively bombing them and taking credit for overthrowing Assad and on the verge of overthrowing Iran, is of course totally delusional.
SecureSignals
1mo ago
It is no longer an "ambitious enclave", after Zionist Jews in the American government influence Trump to overthrow Iran on behalf of Israel, which is going to happen imminently, Israel will be the undisputed hegemon in the region. Imagine if Rome were dominated by Carthegian-loyal senators who influenced Rome to destroy all of Carthage's enemies so Carthage could be the undisputed hegemon in the region. That's not a hypothetical, that is the present day, and it's the consequence of allowing your society and culture to be governed by a people loyal to a foreign empire.
Oh yeah and the Ellison's getting TikTok algo was also just a "fuck you" to PRC, nothing to do with the stated motives pushed by the Jewish lobby for forcing the TikTok divestment. Bored billionaires, burning cash because they are spoiled heirs, just sending "fuck yous", Weiss's pro-Israel allegiance and steering of the network is just incidental- none of those explanations are plausible given this pattern of facts.
Why did Netanyahu support the sale of TikTok and acquisition of the algo by Ellison? To send a "fuck you" to China?
More options
Context Copy link