A few posts ago you were declaring that Superintelligence has a specific meaning in the AI field and now you’re saying that it’s not a useful term and can have no useful meaning and the only reason I could be using it is because I’m a cultist following Trump.
You want to have it both ways so you can feel righteous indignation and get upvotes.
“Superintelligence” is very useful as a term to describe the coming better-than-human intelligence. This is the sense in which I used it and I’m glad that Trump popularized this term, even if for non-technical reasons.
Your frustration is not an argument.
I will continue to use it without caving to demands that I recite the technical researcher’s definition at every utterance, recognizing that I might be subjected to emotional episodes from people who want me to be a stand-in for their frustrations with Donald Trump.
p
A few posts ago you were declaring that Superintelligence has a specific meaning in the AI field and now you’re saying that it’s not a useful term and can have no useful meaning and the only reason I could be using it is because I’m a cultist following Trump.
You want to have it both ways so you can feel righteous indignation and get upvotes.
“Superintelligence” is very useful as a term to describe the coming better-than-human intelligence. This is the sense in which I used it and I’m glad that Trump popularized this term, even if for non-technical reasons.
Your frustration is not an argument.
I will continue to use it without caving to demands that I recite the technical researcher’s definition at every utterance, recognizing that I might be subjected to emotional episodes from people who want me to be a stand-in for their frustrations with Donald Trump.
More options
Context Copy link