SoonToBeBanned
No bio...
User ID: 2653
SoonToBeBanned
6mo ago
He's gambling with WW3
What is it with Russian shills and this stock phrase? What on earth is in their mind? I'm mystified.
A "World War" needs multiple nations around that world to be at war. Presumably highly developed ones of equal relatively strength. There are no other nations. There's Russia, maybe North Korea, and that's it. China is certainly not going to get involved. Who else? India? Japan? Brazil? If NATO/Europe gets involved it's over for Russia. The only thing I can think of is it means nuclear missiles.
SoonToBeBanned
6mo ago
Peace and prosperity in Europe. To put this in neonazi terms, higher IQ western whites, spearheaded by leadership heavily colored by those born within the Hajnal line, have naturally held this one weird compact: no more brother wars. White western civilization also maintains its near monopoly on functional true democracy (for whatever worth and reality there is in that). And the peace and prosperity furthers the goal of Western civilization constantly getting richer, more technologically advanced, and producing the high levels of human cultural output - instead of being distracted with constant dick measuring wars between worthless dictators playing their own map expansion and coloring games. That latter bit is more the area of say, Africa or the Middle East, with one notable exception.
Weirdly, slavs consistently are the odd man out here. Southern slavs in the Balkans being the exception to European peace in the 90s. And Russia never ever being able to match the civilization level of western nations i.e. they've never had a democracy and similar internal civil development, for some reason, and show no signs of self improvement in the near future.
The Russian war of annexation is symbolically and functionally a civilizational war of oriental despotism and 3rd worldism vs Western Civilization. Resistance against it is resistance said orientalism and lower level of civilization. It punishes the weak and problemed in favor of the thriving and superior. Appeasement is degradation and invitation to further rot.
It's the geopolitical equivalent of a schoolyard bully that comes from a broken dysfunctional home of a whorish single mother and revolving door of boyfriends that occasionally beat said bully. Everyone with half a brain can tell such a bully is going nowhere in life long term, even if he's big right now. He takes advantage of high trust societal norms (non-violent, conflict averse teachers) to let out his frustration, from internal problems, on other students like "nerds" (who are actually higher IQ, more prosocial, and more mentally well adjusted). You'd be a fool to think the "nerds" should just let the bully do whatever he wants under the idea he'll just stop, or even worse sink to his level and imitate him. He's the defect and weak link.
SoonToBeBanned
6mo ago
It’s a threat.
Not it's not. You are being disingenuous. It's a statements of words. Words do not hurt or harm. And a statement of belief.
You can’t cheer on death and hide behind it being a political statement.
Why can't you? You literally can, and it can very much be a political statement. People cheer death all the time. I remember people cheering Saddam Hussein dying. Was that not political statement, belief, and speech? And I literally can't count and catalog the amount of political invective I've heard against the Clintons on the Internet, over the years.
SoonToBeBanned
6mo ago
Progressive politics just let a large swathe of California burn to the ground and the media told us blaming politicians was the height of rudeness
What the hell are you talking about? The level of deranged obsessive yet performative hatred and outright lying about California that exists in the right-wing sphere never ceases to amaze me. Are you saying "progressives" started literal fires? Or do you think your hobby horse and tribal "enemies" somehow made firefighting less effective? Or is this some weird dig at homelessness and media influences perceptions of petty crime, and the assumption that level surface tibal party politics has anything to do with them?
Someone on the Internet speculated that this tweet/Truth posting (?) was testing the waters. I find that a very plausible explanation.
In which case, it reminds me of Historia Civilis's amazing storytelling about later Caesar. At Lupercalia there's an incident where Mark Antony suddenly out of nowhere, from a crowd, appears and insists Caesar wear a diadem/crown which would make him a king. As people do sometimes, you know? Caesar turns down the repeated bizarre attempts. Speculation abounds that Caesar and Antony were testing the waters to see how the public reacted to him finally taking the shot and outright calling himself king, rather than dictator for life with a literal golden throne. But they plainly didn't like it so he pretended it was presumptions and silly. In other words, depending how Trump's fanbase reacts to this, and how much everyone else pushes back, we will get more.
Anyway, yeah. I've never had Trump derangement syndrome. And it's strange because going by topology, I should have it. I've been mystified by what people see in him, negative or positive. I get downvoted and banned for both defending and denouncing him (the latter more so only around here or places like this). I thought I was clear headed and everyone else was going insane, but maybe I've been missing something. It seems the squawking MSM libs saw something I could not. He really does seem to be a fascist, and him and his cohort really are a danger to democracy. All I can say now is I notice I am confused.
And? Doesn't change what I said or the fact you're objectively wrong. The goal is to help people grow stronger.
Obviously "Communists" are not childish idiots with a terminally naive utopian pacifism. Almost by definition they are self selected from the more hardcore and roughneck of the greater socialist umbrella. They are willing to do what must be done to survive and thrive. But if everyone woke up tomorrow willing to work in peace and be a "Communist," or at least friendly, there would be no need for fighting nor an iota of desire for it - and the overwhelming majority would soon become richer and more prosperous with net utilitarian gains. It's a very prosocial ideology. It's generally right-wing ideologies that are characterized by a desire to mass murder the different.
Like, those 1918 quotes are from a period of straight up revolution and civil war, which they did not start nor desire. The initial Russian coup was fairly bloodless, but certain people weren't having it and were willing to kill and drag the country, if not world, into war and chaos to make sure it didn't happen. Do you oppose law & order, or the right to defend yourself? Do you think people shouldn't commit to war?
The idea that identifiable classes of humans were evil by nature and would need to be exterminated
Again, and? Do you think there or no evil people in society? Or is this just rank hypocrisy where those you perceive to be evil of course deserve to be suppressed if not eliminated, but when other people do it... And you're wrong, the thing about class is you specifically don't need to exterminate anyone nor is it by inborn nature. This isn't HBD. You can simply cast off the clothes of a class and you'll be fine. The nature of Communism guarantees dignified proper livelihood regardless of your personage, even if you're no longer a 1% elite.
See the case of former emperor Puyi and that one movie The Last Emperor, as a visual example.
SoonToBeBanned
6mo ago
The Communists' stated goal was to make a better world by killing everyone who didn't fit into it
That is not remotely the goal of Communists. Especially stated. The goal of Communists is to maximize personal freedom and prosperity.
It's not intense enough. I'll go further.
Trump is a traitor to the USA, and we need to start seriously discussing imprisonment or a bullet to the brain. I'm serious.
I don't know if he's just a natural slave, so addled by age that he's easily manipulated and totally confused, or he really is compromised by Kremlin agents, but either way, he is not an American. He is a Russian (and Israeli, let's be real) stooge that has infiltrated the highest levels of American government.
What's more galling and troubling is his pathetic followers are so fucking stupid, immoral, and spiritually weak that they will mindlessly follow his treason. This hasn't been said much outloud because it's too "unkind" and extreme, but it's time to face the music. One of the definitive characteristics of modern "conservatism"/Republicanism is stupidity (for white people), and a low capacity for morality, and most of all, an extremely weak ability to think for oneself. A highly servile disposition prone to seeking out daddy/leader figures. NPCism combined with resentful hatred, insecurity, and confusion.
What that means, disturbingly, is one traitor in the Alpha Brain leadership means now a legion of NPCs, on display right here, mindlessly "sanewashing" and realigning their "thinking" with the new gibberish. They betray and try to sabotage America, their own home, too, because they can't think better for themselves. Fucking enraging and beyond pathetic. The most powerful nation in the world, a puppet of some semi-3rd world dictatorship shithole in the east (and that one less 3rd worldish nation in the desert). All because a huge segment of the USA chooses to be, or naturally is, mental invalids.
Or maybe it's what was just said, but Trump is such a narcissist he thinks he can pull a straight up "we have always been at war with Eastasia." Maybe just as a power move or something. Again, depressingly, he is at least right with some. I guess that could also be it.
More options
Context Copy link