@Soteriologian's banner p

Soteriologian


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 June 30 23:52:08 UTC

				

User ID: 2538

Soteriologian


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 June 30 23:52:08 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2538

I get what you’re trying to say, but the evidence is overwhelming.

Take Ms Maxwell: she sat around Burgerstan for a year while Epstein was arrested and dragged through the legal system, all while having citizenship in France—a country that has refused to extradite citizens to the US on this very matter. How irredeemably stupid do you have to be to have citizenship in a sanctuary state and just sit around on your ass anyway waiting to be arrested?

Whatever this cabal may be, it’s not an elite pedophile cabal. It’s at best a retarded pedophile cabal. And probably not even that: it seems more like a 17-and-364 days larping-as-a-pedophile cabal. Alan Dershowitz supposedly even kept his underwear on. Can you imagine the blackmail? It’s probably some washed up widow from Latin America whose husband died in a cartel spat lying about her age as she gives this crusty old prune a massage with all the enthusiasm of doing the dishes after Christmas dinner (while Dershowitz giddily thinks this is the hottest thing ever). Now that is blackmail!

And most of the people involved aren’t even blackmail-able in any sensible way. Take Clinton—his involvement seems to have been after his presidency. The fuck are they gonna do, blackmail someone who isn’t even in a position of political power anymore? And what of Dershowitz. He’s a Jew. Is Israel blackmailing the Jews into being Jewish?

All of this is so, so stupid. The reality is rightoid conspiritards fantasize about being ruled by a pedophile cabal because of their latent ancestral memory of living under the Catholic Church—a continent-ruling boylover cabal that was on a mission to breed the world’s most beautiful race. The plan was okay for a while, until it worked too well and Mewtwo escaped his cage, rather confused and devoid of purpose, but nonetheless extremely powerful. Thus the whole scheme came crashing down, and the Catholic Church is now so degraded it doesn’t even remember its own secrets: they have an American pope wearing an Apple Watch at mass.

This is the power of the retard hypothesis.

"If the conspiracy were true, they would have been a lot smarter about it."

Are you challenging the Retard Hypothesis?

Look this tiny highlight from OP: "yo, imma call my mom" when she’s been dead for two decades? How silly! A high-profile international trafficker would construct a good lie, not a stupid lie. And prison staff would be naturally suspicious, and verify that he was actually calling his mother.

I mean what, is everyone involved just hopelessly retarded?

yes

The Rescuers Down Under. It doesn’t even feel like a sequel, partly because it’s just better than the original, and partly because it’s from before Disney went creatively bankrupt and started churning out vapid content to milk legacy IPs.

We need to get to the bottom of this. Were there any pedophiles in the pedophile cabal, or was it wholly infiltrated by blackmailers with no authentic dedication to pedophilia at all?

Is there any gold in Fort Knox?

The story is a bit cheesy, and takes itself more seriously than is merited given its quality.

But the battle system is really unusual and really fun. I did two challenge runs with it in the past year: gambits only (no issuing any manual commands during combat) and Vaan solo, both of which were challenging enough to be fun but not so difficult as to be frustrating or infuriating.

"Usability research" is not formal theory. It’s psychology, applied to human-computer interaction. And psychology has one of the worst track records of any field ever.

By formal theory, I mean math you can put into a theorem prover like Coq/Agda/Lean.

I have strong feelings that GUI toolkits have never been done well. All existing solutions are bad, and they’re mostly all bad in the exact same ways.

The root of the problem is smart people want to work on things where they can deliver formal results—and in many areas of software engineering, you can! Databases, type systems, even graphics to a large extent are all backed by substantial formal theory (even if the users of these technologies are largely unaware).

UI, on the other hand, has no backing in formal theory whatsoever. It’s like knot theory in mathematics, or the Collatz conjecture—nobody even knows where to start to make progress in a direction anyone would care about.

It’s hard to do any worse than the results themselves these days, but they pull it off somehow.

I’m not active, but I played hardcore a fair bit. I think my living characters are a mid-40s mage and a mid-20s priest.

I like the early Alliance classic flow, up through around Duskwood. And I like the endgame, especially Blackrock Depths. But from around 37-57, the game is such a slog, especially without the accelerated levelling curve from future expansions.

Still, I might try to hit 60 before TBC anniversary begins, since I’ve never done TBC on schedule before and I’d kinda like to experience it.

You may be older than you think—MC was definitely soloable in WotLK, which was over 15 years ago!

You don’t watch WoW streamers? Where do you get your geopolitical analysis from? Surely not some legacy boomer outlet, I hope.

I bet Rachel Maddow couldn’t even clear Molten Core.

Flash was vastly more inspired than the gui tech stacks in wide use today. You could do so much with it without having to be a programmer.

I hope so. If I ever try to take over the world, I can’t imagine seeing all these comments steelmanning my endeavor as some bureaucratic trifle.

I am burning the Erdtree, goddammit! I intend to ascend to Elden Lord and reforge the shattered Elden Ring!

I don’t think it’s nostalgia. I’m playing Persona 4 for the first time now, and it’s fantastic. And it can’t be nostalgia, because I never played any Persona games growing up.

People were just less brainwormed back then, and it shows.

I mean, you’ve gotta have some sort of aesthetic context. Gaming minus aesthetics is just computer science problems. Like, yes, you could play Pokémon without all the cute animals and sound effects—it’s just a big chart, mechanically—but somehow I doubt anyone finds being handed the Serebii data dump is a comparable experience to "Pikachu, I choose you!"

And don’t get me wrong, I do enjoy computer science. But it’s not the same thing as gaming.

In some sense I think this is even more damning than it may seem to a naive viewer.

Like, that scratchpad memory a la Memento strategy should absolutely work, assuming you have an intelligent agent in the first place. The fact that it works so poorly is a sign there’s serious problems with the thinking part of SotA LLMs. It’s not merely a memory problem.

I don’t deny that the things you mention may be factors, but I think by far the most prominent driver of trust decline is people giving compelling evidence that they are, in fact, untrustworthy.

The problem is lack of trust. Is that vaccine real or is it just a way to sell a product at taxpayer expense? Are those people regulating industrial waste actually engaging in a good-faith effort to keep the commons clean, or are they just regulating competitors of their lobbyists’ sponsors off the board?

You cannot have nice things without trust, and "trust" isn’t some value that mystically vanished: the disappearance of trust has been warranted. The governing strata of society are infested with liars and grifters.

What’s happened is the aesthetic of the Empire became less about some non-partisan celebration of Captain America’s thunderbutt and more about evangelising radical social issues of the Democrat party like Pride Parades and trans kids.

The Republicans, thanks to their total lack of representation in organisations of any influence, decided it was simpler to dismantle the Empire entirely rather than try to steer it away from gay pride back to Captain Thunderbutt.

Basically, the Empire-maintaining parts of the government became partisan, and now are being cut off since the other party is in power.

Cut adverbs.

abandoned Walmart (shoplifting killed it)

That’s impressive. It is difficult to kill a Walmart.

Not if you keep your socks on!

My personal favorite:

https://github.com/Speykious/cve-rs

The comical part is they try to act like this is some minor compiler bug that can be fixed and not a core problem with the type theory (or lack thereof) itself.

Unsoundness of this sort would be fine if Rust portrayed the type checker as a mere tool to assist a well-intentioned author in reasoning; but it’s portrayed as an authority capable of guaranteeing memory safety, and you’re expected to submit yourself to it.

It’s not probable, but still, President of the United States is by far the most lethal job you can legally have.

Statistically, there’s a nearly 10% chance you’ll be killed (not merely die; be killed!)

Trump would be safer working as a RedBull stuntman than working his current job.

Inbuilt disdain of "computer says no because reasons" not enough?

What exactly are you arguing against here? Error messages at compile time? There’s plenty of interpreted languages that crash at runtime if that floats your boat.

Presumably, such people enjoy removing the annoying "check engine" light and just waiting for their engine to start smoking.

that "shipping product that works well enough" is more important than "mathematically correct, but your competition beat you to market by a month"

I don’t believe this is even a real dichotomy, at least in the Rust vs mainstream language sense. (Obviously if you’re formalising something in Lean4, that’s going to be comically inefficient compared to just building it, but that’s so far from the Rust vs C++ land it’s not even relevant.) The reason companies are fond of mainstream languages has nothing to do with engineering, it has to do with the availability of replacement labor. It doesn’t matter what technical properties the mainstream language has; what matters is that it’s mainstream.

which is why everyone tends to bitch about the borrow checker

I’m going to out myself as much crazier than anyone may have expected, but: the borrow checker is the least-inspired part of Rust and the language would be better without it entirely. The reasons Rust is good are because it actually has sane primitive types, non-ambiguous syntax, algebraic data types, parametric polymorphism, a non-busted standard library, and perhaps most importantly: cargo.

The borrow checker paradigm is basically a half-baked bastardization of linear types, and the way it’s done has some serious theoretical deficiencies that basically mandate leaky abstractions. But I’m not going to babble about that here.