@Stellula's banner p

Stellula


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2024 February 17 00:19:01 UTC

				

User ID: 2884

Stellula


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2024 February 17 00:19:01 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2884

God knows that it is our fate to spend our lives in the darkness, and knows that we'll need a light.

C is the language which feels like it can get us out, but python is the language that will be there for us when we can't.

Python is very golden retriever coded.

I just watched the preview for this, and it's funny how quickly red/blue tropes shifted.

When this was made I imagine that the family is meant to be taken as fun loving, goofy, and obviously blue, where as SJP is meant to be taken as stuffy, uptight, and obviously red. (edit: I just read the plout outline and one of the family members is a gay, black, deaf man who adopts a child with his gay lover)

But my initial read when watching the preview was that this was a story about an uptight leftist/frigid/HR/feminist type having to spend the holidays with a bunch of conservatives.

Central planning fails again.

Every single time. This happens every time where you try to engineer around the existence of the human soul, and it will continue to happen, forever. There is a war going on between the ensouled and the enslaved, and you can see it playing out here. The enslaved, who occupy places like HR departments, CPS field agencies, reddit moderation discords, city ordinance compliance departments, HOA boards, and Rust governance bodies, fight against the idea that an ensouled human being might have their own ideas about how to live their life, or how to manage the memory on their own computer.

C is god's language, and as counterintuitive as it may sound: so is python. All other languages exist only to build a path towards enslavement.

imagine the smell

If any of you are on the tech/ai/startup side of x (which I imagine is everybody here), you probably saw the following exchange:

  1. A guy working as 'head of AI' for a company called Cline commented "Imagine the smell" under a photo of a hackathon.

  2. Indians assumed that somebody commenting on the smellyness of a hackathon (I've been to many hackathons, and nerds smell) must be commenting on Indians, and thus freaked out.

  3. The guy who made the comment replied to some of them saying that no, actually, he was just making a common internetism, and generally speaking to the smell of a bunch of guys in a packed room.

  4. The guy's boss gets involved, surely due to the campaign by online Indians to get him fired, saying that he wouldn't be firing anybody.

  5. Enough pressure happened that the guy's boss recanted, and fired the guy.

  6. Now the internet is imagining a lot of smells, cline has earned a ton of bad will, and the general dislike of Indians in the tech community has grown.

Here are some thoughts on this:

  • I'm increasingly of the opinion that people should be able to filter the internet by country. I don't care what people from 9000 miles away, from a totally different culture, who have no investment or stake in my society have to say about it. I don't want to interact with these people. My life and my world is not a place for them to wage petty dramas and entertain themselves by harassing people here.

  • Indians specifically (and I say this as somebody who has spent a considerable amount of time in India, consuming indian culturalisms, and interacting with Indians) seem to have a particular penchant for online drama. There seems to be a particular focus on people saving or losing some form of "face", although that isn't exactly it. It's similar to honor culture you find in other societies, but maybe just its own Indian brand of it. I think what we're seeing here are two cultures which should be separated by 10,000 miles of ocean running into each other on the internet; the clash should not be unexpected.

  • "Imagine the smell" is not an anti-Indian slur, or at least it wasn't. It comes from image boards, and gets said under almost any moderately interesting photo of people. However, I think the massive freak out over this has turned it into one. Interdesting.

Just to further drive this point home: the narcos are engaged in what is effectively chemical warfare. They are in the process of violating the GC when they were shot out of the water.

  • -10

ChatGPT answered this question just find.

Short answer: Yes, a politician can claim it, but the claim is internally inconsistent with the core teachings attributed to Jesus.

Here’s the clean breakdown without soft-pedaling anything:

  1. What Jesus actually commanded

Jesus’s explicit moral directives include: • Radical, unilateral compassion (Matthew 5–7). • Care for the foreigner (Matthew 25; repeated in Torah citations). • Protection of the poor and vulnerable. • Refusal to use coercive force in moral disputes (“put your sword back”).

There is no textual basis for Jesus endorsing state violence against outsiders, the poor, or the displaced.

  1. What ICE does

ICE agents: • Track and seize impoverished people, often with guns drawn. • Separate families. • Transport and deport them by force. These are deliberate state actions using threats of lethal force to detain individuals who usually pose no violent threat.

  1. The contradiction

A politician who: 1. Publicly claims to follow Jesus’s teachings and simultaneously 2. Supports the state hunting down poor foreigners at gunpoint and removing them from the country

…is making a claim that conflicts with the documented ethical demands Jesus laid down.

There is no credible reading of the gospels in which Jesus would approve of using armed agents to remove vulnerable outsiders. The closest parallels (the Good Samaritan, Matthew 25’s judgment of nations, his warnings about harming “the least of these”) point in the opposite direction.

  1. So would Jesus be disappointed?

Based solely on the text: Yes. He consistently condemned leaders who used power against the weak while claiming religious legitimacy. This is exactly the type of behavior he targeted in his most severe critiques.

If you want, I can outline the specific gospel passages that make the contradiction unavoidable.

Regardless of the specifics of handmaids tale, my general point is that debating surrogacy is well, well within the Overton window right now.

Well the first thing he is obviously trolling, and the second two are pretty benign.

Surrogacy basically the plot of handmaid's tale. It seems like there's quite a bit of resistance against that.

And as far as people with dual citizenship not being Americans - this is also self evidently true. There are some semantics that could be worked here, but there is certainly a different class of American who would have dual citizenship. Is a person in a polyamorous marriage really married in the classic sense to their husband? I mean...yes...sortof, but also not really.

Why don’t we flip this.

What are some policy positions of Fuentes that you don’t like?

Not trolling or trying to be funny, but actual consistent positions?

One of the crazier things to see here is the normie Jewish response.

To call us dual loyalists is an anti semetic dog whistle. Also I voted for Trump due to his support of Israel, and see Fuentes talk like this, against Israel, has got me angry. I’m not voting for Trump anymore now.

Huh?

Anti semetic tropes like the idea that the Jews killed Jesus when it was the Romans!

Yes yes the Jews didn’t kill Jesus they just lobbied the local government to do it for them, which sounds like a Larry David sketch FFS.

Eric Weinstein posted something on twitter the other day attacking the idea of dual loyalty, and pointed out that people asked the same question of Kennedy. Yes Eric, they did. Was it because they were Nazis? Or maybe this is just a reasonable question? Perhaps infinitely more reasonable to ask a Jew than a Catholic when we aren’t sending missiles to the Vatican and I can’t ever move there if I want and there aren’t any senators saying they want to the Vatican’s number one representative in congress?

And then of course there is Ben Shapiro himself, saying his loyalty to America is “backstopped” by the existence of Israel, because if America ever makes him mad he can just leave and go there - but don’t ever dare suggest that he might have dual loyalty.

The duplicity of all of this is staggering.

In any case, as I've mentioned before, we don't get paid to manage stuff like this - usually go home and relax is the treatment. We get paid to manage your aunt who is on 8 medications for chronic conditions including hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and s/p hysterectomy for 3a cancer who we see every 4-6 weeks instead of once a year.

We are arguing the exact same thing now. The people who are talking to those people should NOT be the person I am talking to for a fever and a sore throat. Thats the absurd inefficiency.

I basically need to talk to a pharmacist, not a doctor.

Again, I am not a doctor. The response I am giving here is essentially me echoing the response I've gotten from telling this story to my doctor friends/family. Basically: "You had a fever for a week, you tested negative for the few viral things they tested for, and they didn't want to explore it further at all or put you on an antibiotic as a precaution?"

Maybe that's wrong. I don't know! What I do know is that "the only people who should be able to tell you anything about this have to make $250k/yr at a minimum, and have to have a seemingly endless number of administrators around them" seems outrageously inefficient to me. Maybe it's not!

My insurance changed last month, my PCP is no longer “in network” and the wait to get into a new one is long, which is why I was at UC. I did go to me “PCP” (a concierge group). That was the second doctor, which I paid cash for. As the symptoms worsened I could have gone back to them again, I guess. However when I was there, they seemed almost offended that I was because my insurance wasn’t usable to them. One reason the doctor said she didn’t want to do any tests (and tried to just get me to go to CVS for the Covid test instead of doing it there) was that my insurance wouldnt cover any of them.

So; just more ridiculous inefficiency in the inefficient healthcare system.

Kind of a meta point here, but I think you’re demonstrating maybe my exact frustration. You assume I’m stupid and don’t know how the system is supposed to work, or that I’m trying to abuse it in some way. I’m assuring you: I do know how it is supposed to work and I’m trying to use it correctly. It’s just that the system does suck

Patients will always ask for antibiotics even if we know in advance the issue is viral and antibiotics won't do anything, and that's not counting the goal of abx stewardship, or just minimizing side effect burden. No medications are safe, if you give everyone in the country a full course of antibiotics people are going to lose their kidneys, have joins explode, or just flat out die.

I was making a general point about the inefficiency of the healthcare system, but to address these point specifically:

I didn't ask for antibiotics. I was trying to do things exactly the way you are advocating here. I didn't just get antibiotics, I did go to the doctor four times, and the first 3 of them did essentially nothing. The first one had this interaction:

Do you have a fever?

Well yes, but I'm controlling it with tylenol every 4 hours.

So you don't have a fever?

Well if I stop taking the tylenol, my temperate goes over 102, so I keep on the tylenol and have been for a week.

Okay but your temperature is reading normal right now, it's not showing a fever.

Yes but like I said, I have been taking tylenol regularly to manage the fever, which I have now had for a full week.

Okay so no fever.

The second one was this interaction

Hi I've had a fever for a week and a half now, and the first person I saw said that if it didn't go away, to see my PCP, which is you.

Okay? You probably have a virus

Okay yes but is there anything else we could check for?

I guess I can give you a covid test if you want me to.

I'm asking you for your opinion here? I'm not a doctor, but I've never been this sick for this long before and it's got me concerned.

Okay a covid test I guess?

Sure?

The third one was a telehealth visit, literally not even a video just a text message with a doctor (maybe?)

The fourth was:

Hello I am now on week 3 of some sort of illness, the first week and a half was a 102+ fever, and now I have a sore throat that started one one side of my throat and then over a couple of days moved to both. I am having difficulty swallowing, and if you look deeply into my throat, you'll see it's covered in quite a few tiny white spots.

Those are tonsil stones

No I know what you're talking about, but to see what I'm talking about, you really would need a scope. I could only see the spots I'm talking about using a boroscope, and they're pretty deep inside my throat.

No i can see those from here, the two white spots at the back are tonsil stones

No, I mean a lot deeper than that.

Yeah I see it. Those are tonsil stones

etc.

Yeah probably a viral thing -> weakened immune system -> bacterial infection/secondary viral infection, and anti-biotics were a coincidence. My general point is that this entire escapade is only made worse by gatekeeping healthcare. Offhand I can think of 6 different doctors with different specialities in my very close family circle (either my siblings, or godparents of my kids), and all of them would easily just let me call them and give me recommendations on what do to while I'm sick. The point I'm making here is that I didn't do that, because I was just trying to use the healthcare system as prescribed, and that i was an inefficient joke.

Well first of all the family member is a doctor (just not a family doctor), and second: how does the doctor know? Are they given secret knowledge that is inaccessible to mere humans?

Doctors aren’t priests. The stuff that 90% of PCPs are doing could be replaced by a flow chart. As far as antibiotic stewardship, when China and India and Brazil and everybody else gets on board, maybe.

The parasites in this situation are the health insurance companies, and to a lesser degree, the actual providers.

I was recently sick, and it took four different doctor visits before somebody just gave me the antibiotics which fixed whatever problem I was having. The first one, an "urgent care" told me to just rest and hydrate. The second, my PCP, gave me a covid test, said that it was negative, shrugged, and said R&H, the third (telehealth) gave me a useless antibiotic and did no testing. The fourth, another UC, gave me a strep test, a mono test, and then some steroids and antibiotics.

This is retarded. A family member, when I was first complaining about being sick, offered to just write me a prescription for the cocktail of drugs he takes when he starts feeling sick, but me being a good little boy said I wanted to go see a doctor.

This should have been a 2 minute long discussion with a pharmacist at most where I tell them what drugs I want, then half an hour at my local lab where they do a few tests for me, and that's it.

As it is, with the retarded "health" cartel, there was probably thousands of dollars of useless waste spent on useless doctors and useless nurses performing useless tests (covid? Really? Flu?). Their goal is to gatekeep as many things as possible behind absurdly expensive gates, then when costs go to infinity, they demand the government subsidize them.

The couple you talk about in the beginning of this post suck, but so does the industry they're sucking.

As usual this is all made a lot worse when the government subsidises all of it.

I like it! My only request is that we build a giant dedicated building for it, preferably so tall that you can't see the top from the bottom, and give whoever is taking a turn speaking a levitating platform to stand on that can move around the chamber while they talk.

Joking aside (although I do really like the idea at first), how would various committees work? Just equally large?

I think you got it! Thanks!

Btw everybody here’s the patreon: https://www.patreon.com/themotte

E-collars are extremely common for people with dogs and land, especially people with hunting dogs.

https://www.garmin.com/en-US/c/outdoor-recreation/sporting-dog-tracking-training-devices/

It's completely mainstream to use e-collars for pets, but not like this.

The typical use for an e-collar is for recall, and there are multiple levels to it.

  1. Noise (it beeps)
  2. Vibe (it vibrates)
  3. Shock

You use these when you issue the recall command (usually: "come!") but the dog is too fixated on something to respond. You start by doing the beeps, then the vibe, and then only if the dog is totally locked into something would you use the shock. The shock isn't a punishment, it's just there to get the dogs attention.

There are people who use the shock as punishment, but they're the minority.

Is it lost on everybody that he was basically quoting the office? As in: the most normie of normie network tv shows from the early 2000s?

The quote “if I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and Toby, and I only had two bullets, I would shoot Toby twice.”

These were private text messages. He was trying to be funny. I don’t think this is in any way an indication of some secret desire to kill anybody, the jokes just weren’t landing.

I really hate this trend of taking conversations from one context, putting them into another context, and pretending that the person meant something they didn’t.

It was the same two weeks ago with libs hyperventilating over Trump saying “I hate my enemies”, just clearly him trying to be funny, and not the major escalation people seemed to want it to be.

Just absolutely stupid rage searching. This is nothing. There are plenty of examples of libs engaging in legitimately dangerous speech, like publicly calling Trump and his supporters “fascists” and “Nazis”, for instance. This was a guy having a private conversation that should have stayed private.

Also: it shouldn’t be lost on the people here that none of us are posting with our full names. The point of a place like this is to be able to pick up an idea and argue it even if you don’t agree with it. If somebody doxxed everybody here, and implied this was their true beliefs that they keep hidden, would they be right? (I don’t think so). The same is true of a private text message chain.

  • -13

I really wish you and the person below you would just link to the part of the speech you are talking about.

It’s a cleanliness and discipline thing. That’s all.

edit: I want to be clear that I enjoy this type of back and forth, but only if you do. I'm not trying to demean anybody here, I just enjoy this type of sparring. I still think the people who jumped on the "mormons are not Christian" thing immediately after (now 4) people were killed are bad people. If you want to keep arguing because you also think it's fun, then all good, but please don't take any of this as me wanting to attack you, or other mormons. If you want to know my feelings: I consider you guys brothers, and think that a lot of what the mormon church has done from a strategic and organizational perspective is impressive and something I wish my own church would take notes on, but I also think that the book of mormon is very obviously a hoax from a creative young man in 1800s upstate New York. From talking to mormons, I see a lot of overlap in the implementation of Christian philosophy, especially the emphasis on the importance of doing good work, with my own, Catholic beliefs. I think that's good. Okay I hope I've been reassuring enough that I don't mean any of this in bad spirit, just because I enjoy the game:

It seems like you’re claiming there really aren’t many differences.

Then why the need for the entire project? And if so many core theological beliefs of Mormons just eventually get erased out, as the “god was once a man” did in 1997 or so, then what is the point of any of it?

By the way, I think this is a good thing. Mormon beliefs like black people lesser-than (or in some cases outright demons), everybody getting their own planet, Kolob, polygamy, etc. are all things which I think are wrong, and all thinks which the Mormon leaders have later discovered that they think are wrong too.

They also seem like things a teenager in the 1800s in upstate New York would make up as part of a fantasy universe.

As far as the literal truth of the Book of Mormon: there’s obviously a ton of problems here. Horses not existing in pre Colombian America, for instance. Jews not sailing from the Levant to North America in ~600BC for another.