@SteveKirk's banner p
BANNED USER: alt of banned user

SteveKirk


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 4 users  
joined 2024 April 10 04:39:31 UTC

				

User ID: 2984

Banned by: @Amadan

BANNED USER: alt of banned user

SteveKirk


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 4 users   joined 2024 April 10 04:39:31 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2984

Banned by: @Amadan

Long term support version of 10 has many years left, right? And you can use a certain GitHub program to give yourself the industry pro version of that. I'm doing a reinstall this week, will do that myself

This is so dumb. So five minutes after claiming 8th gen Intel will be fine for general browsing for a long time yet, I notice high CPU use watching a YouTube video, in all browsers. Go over Vivaldi:GPU with a fine tooth comb to see what went wrong. Triple check everything's running on the right GPU...

And then it turns out YouTube just stopped honoring my "please don't use av1" setting without telling me. Bitch you could just ask my browser if I have hardware support for your fancy codec.

God why is everything so janky. I need a browser extension to use the same YouTube account on PC and phone, because there's no setting for "please only use av1 on devices that support it, and no the 6 year old laptop can't even though the phone can"

Cynically YouTube doesn't give a shit, because forcing av1 saves them bandwidth and most consumers won't make the connection between their noisy computer fan and playing YouTube videos.

You can always tell when someone has had their preferences (or identity) overwritten by porn rather than irl experience, so that's a good place to start for any sort of "valid/invalid" distinction.

Personally I think racial preferences are just a healthy expression of racism.

The important thing is to never get stuck defending your preferences on the terms of some activist who's accusing you of internalized queerphobic racism for liking hot chicks. Laugh at them, ban them, hit them with a brick, whatever, just do not engage on their terms, ever. Just letting them be seen on the attack with you defending is a loss, even if you "win" the debate hard enough for them to call you a Nazi and storm off.

I just use a win10 desktop and Linux (mint xfce) laptop as a "home server." Both 8th gen Intel, which is still adequate for everything, and will be until they finally come up with a better video codec than vp9.

Modern Linux is so simple a non tech person wouldn't even notice the change as long as you use the default windows background. The browser is identical, and that's all that matters 99% of the time.
Some of my friends are using Linux on their family desktops, like my dad on his 6th gen Intel. He can even watch YouTube properly because Linux actually added limited vp9 decoding support for quick sync on skylake, although that's something I had to get working for him.

I've had random wifi connectivity drops on my android phone lately. Seems like something to with ip leases expiring: it will lose Internet connectivity on the 5ghz network, but switch over to the 2.4 network within a few seconds. I should try disabling DHCP and hard coding fucking everything

Win10 PC just developed a habit of graphics crashing (window frozen, mouse still moves, hard reset needed) when dragging Firefox between monitors. Jank just seems inevitable unless you buy apple and use them exactly as prescribed.

(Re. Crashing: main monitor plugged into GPU, side ones into igpu, browsers set to run on igpu for hardware accel reasons. And it only happens with Firefox: not brave, not Vivaldi, or edge, or the five year old version of portable chromium I use for running h-(tml)games. Error seemed to start when setting the GPU to power-saving mode. There are a lot of potential factors, fuck)

I once found out I'd lived in the same house as a motter thanks to his description of the insane landlord. It's more likely than you think with how filtered we are by irl interests and professions.

Wait, how do you get all this stuff? I lobotomized my copy of 10 with powershell when I first got it, and set it up to look just like XP. I'd go fucking nuclear if I ever saw an ad in my operating system.

That does seem like a good way to discourage the current massive discrimination against anyone over 40.

Although the equilibrium probably looks like "companies prefer to hire people who've made a visible precommitment to not having children, through public castration rituals and gleeful participation in anti-natalist subcultures."

So basically the same as right now really. HR had better see that funkopop collection when they check your Facebook bluesky page.

I thought they literally don't allow windows to open more than an inch now for the same reason.
There were a lot of window opening loicense jokes on Twitter last summer because of that.

Edit: it's 100mm or ~4"

I've been seriously looking at my index funds and trying to find a way to avoid taking a bath in the next crash. It's going to be incredibly ugly.

Again, your average young normie conservative already gets screwed by the existing insurance system. They had to pass a mandate to make us buy it, because otherwise we wouldn't sign up to pay for everyone else's expensive prep, hormones, sex change operations, SSRIs, reiki energy healing sessions, etc.. That was literally in the justifications for the bill:

Young and healthy individuals are needed to balance out higher risk individuals who are likely to become ill and who will be more costly... In essence what the individual mandate effects by converting the uninsured into healthy insurance policy holders is financing the health care of the sick by those who are healthy, what one author calls "health redistribution"

You don't think this is going to get much worse when a public option run by Equity Consultants takes over? I think that's a severe lack of vision.

Opaque metrics filtered through a layer of "equity pricing" for who pays what, justified through procedural manipulation of cost benefit studies. Literally just the usual "make gun and car owners pay for the costs of their abhorrent lifestyles" applied to literally everything.

Isn't it obvious how this sort of thing will work? We've seen so many examples of how this, I can already write the headlines for it (and the National Review's objections as they stumble along behind history, feebly mumbling "slow down")

Thanks for the look into a community I'm almost completely in the dark on.
I did notice in my very leftist area there's been a Catholic revitalization that the elderly lib faction isn't entirely happy about, led by a conservative firebrand woman with 5 kids. But I don't get to hear anything about the actual institution aside from the difficulty of getting/sharing a local priest.

The hammer symbol is how people can tell it connected I guess.

I did say "when they get their public option", which will not be administered by people trying to make a profit. And of course even if it is some public-private abomination like the university system, we've already seen how willing they are to leave consumer money on the table in exchange for other benefits.

You may not appreciate what it would be like to post in an environment where this level of emotional polemic is levelled against you.

I am reading /r/politics right now where every comment that isn't jeering like what you describe has been <deleted> by mods, and I could go to any other social media site on the planet to get exactly the same experience. This community was literally on reddit experiencing that posting environment, and fully appreciates it. I do not understand this post.

Wow, I literally just saw this copy-pasted 3 times in the same reddit thread. Maybe it will finally overwrite the dialogue tree for the paradox of tolerance quote or "the cruelty is the point"

I'm never surprised when the massive propaganda machine churns out a good zinger. Billions of dollars and man-hours go into it, and some of it is very good at manipulating the carefully-instilled guilt complexes normies suffer from. This is a good example because it builds on a well-established base of blood libel about Christians not caring about babies after they're born, etc.

"Debating" it is pointless, it's just a club made for the hands of redditors.

Simple answer: Kabobi is black, so it doesn't count as a crime against blacks as a group.
The Aryan nations white guy got clemency for... Killing another Aryan nations white guy over a discipline matter.

I would have grudgingly found it admirable if he'd reduced everyone's sentence based on pure conviction that the death penalty is invalid. That's what the pope would have had him do.
But leaving a few on there is just evil gloating that they don't oppose the death penalty, just want it applied by an NPR opinion poll, and only as vengeance for crimes against party-aligned ethnic groups.

Internet archive doesn't seem to have captured the whole page btw.

But we're getting it both ways. They're pushing for "discouraging" activities they oppose while forcing us to subsidize the health risks of activities they support.
Smoking makes your insurance go way up because they specifically allowed it in the ACA, but doing meth and raw dog anal with 20 strangers a week doesn't.

If they get their single payer option you can bet they'll be charging extra for smoking, meat, guns, and weightlifting, but not for obesity, fentanyl, weed, and 1000 man gangbangs at the national bugchaser convention. And it will all be decided by Science™, so disagreeing will make you a science-denying conspiracy theorist.

Plane had just come off the deck and ran into the tico's range. I'm guessing they were running with the local PD in "shoot everything that moves" mode and weren't used to handling flight operations while running in "shoot everything that moves" mode.

If it was hit with a ram or phalanx it'll be confirmation.

They should probably keep the system in "pretend to shoot everything that moves" mode more often for training purposes, so they can log errors like this before they happen live. Have the phalanx go "bang, I would have shot that if I had any ammo, did I do good?"
On the other hand I'm not sure you can run them like that without the hydraulics slewing the barrels round to aim the sensors, and braining sailors on deck already accounts for most of phalanx's kills iirc.

Edit: supposedly the cruiser is a rusty piece of shit dragged out of mothballs and nicknamed the Ghettosburg. Navy culture sounds like a huge mess.

Edit edit: now they're saying it was 2 sm2 missiles fired at returning planes. If true someone's going to hang for this one.

In the prep case it's "wait so I'm paying $20,000 a year just so a gay guy can have unprotected sex for free, but the same people who mandated that are talking about using insurance costs to make driving unaffordable for me?

Insurance and government action have moral hazards it makes perfect sense to get upset about. Like if the government pays a guy to buy solar panels made from coal in China, then pays him a subsidy to make power with them, then pays him to suck the CO2 from the chinese coal out of the air with that power.
Every step of that technological solution makes me poorer for no benefit to anyone except the parasite.

The passenger flight wasn't data linked to the fire control of the Vincennes, whereas in theory fighters are always talking to every US ship with CEC capabilities, which are the ones launching missiles.

Edit: in this case I'm guessing it was an independent low altitude point defense system that shoots first and doesn't waste time asking questions. And someone forgot to flip the switch from "kill everyone" to "don't kill everyone" when they launched planes.

In theory you're not backing all the way down the entropy graph to create a synthetic fossil fuel, you only want to go as far as some compound where carbon can exist as a solid. But yeah, in practical terms with realistic losses it's obviously not energy positive to burn gasoline to run a generator that pulls the carbon back out of the air.

One potential use is if they could do it at very low capital cost (but high energy cost) would be sucking up all the waste electricity from solar and wind. You could site it anywhere, so putting them at key interchanges where you can exploit transmission bottlenecks for cheap electricity would make them free to run much of the time.

Of course, the actual economic benefit of reducing atmospheric carbon is anywhere between "low" and "negative." And ocean fertilization would do the same thing for free. But when has that ever stopped a subsidy program.

I need to reread that! I'll never forget the priest who got fired for grabbing a crossbow to chase down and shoot the guys who robbed him. Only for Louis to rehire him as a soldier.
Wonder if the poor guy survived the whole thing. Probably not.