@TheFooder's banner p

TheFooder


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 October 04 16:21:07 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 1479

TheFooder


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 October 04 16:21:07 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1479

Verified Email

My sister is a bureaucrat and she moves fast and breaks things...most of them are mine. I don't like it at all.

In all seriousness, I work for a start-up with just this sort of mantra, but I think the idea that anyone is moving so fast they haven't considered first or second level consequences is not really representative of how stuff actually gets done. I don't love the meme because I don't think it's accurate. In our case we literally can only move at the speed of the CFTC and our customers, so 'moving fast' is extremely relative.

The Facebook Marketplace is unbelievable useful. It's the one thing that dragged me back

This is the only explanation that makes any sense and I still can't figure out why? To what point? Who is getting trolled? Is Musk actually stupid or a genius? It just doesn't compile for me.

Nearly 100% of its value proposition is gone.

I hate to say it, but the Facebook marketplace is extremely useful. I had to setup an anonymous account that I only access via web because I simply couldn't find better deals on gently used local stuff. I have to give FB credit for this. Also, every business, group and civic organization in my area uses this stupid app, so without it I have no idea what's happening.

So only 85% of it's value proposition is gone.

You've got expensive houses burning down.

I know two families who lost their houses. One is a composer for Disney and the other is an investment banker. It's still a tragedy, and I think of all those Oscars melted to slag...but as Taibbi noted, it's like the inverse of Hurricane Katrina which washed out the lowest wealth citizens of New Orleans.

What I'm wondering about is the effect this will have on insurance companies. I heard--offhandedly--that Allstate had removed fire coverage for the area. Still...I'd guess most people have some kind of fire protection in their insurance portfolio and these are for multi-million dollar buildings.

It's kind of difficult to imagine how this area gets rebuilt too. Will people even want to go back? Also how much of south LA worked in north-west LA? Will unemployment become a big issue? I haven't heard anything from FEMA...maybe that's appropriate?

I'd be interested to see those reports. AFAIK, there were very, very few weapons (none?) recovered during the riot. A serious report to the contrary would cause me to update.

yeah. I never understand the counter-arguments to this. The entire building could have been taken over by American Jihadi's, every person inside massacred and it wouldn't have made any difference to the election outcome or who the president was going to be. I also find it mostly implausible that the participants had any expectation of success...there were no victory conditions. Obviously there are always lizardmen around but the freakoutery around Jan 6th just never made any sense. It was bad, they shouldn't have done it, but it was never a threat to Our Democracy.

I was working up a reply that was basically the same thing: people are being hypocritical and pretending, they were simply wrong about Jan 6th. I was also going to mention the crazy hearings and how they were specifically formulated to make the whole event even more opaque.

I also thought the term 'retcon' didn't make sense. I don't see how people can be 'rewriting' the events or the players. Details may be evolving, but it's not like Republicans are saying Jan 6th was actually about slavery...and it happened in 1776 to George Washington. I dunno...I didn't get it.

Anyone else playing Metaculus? I had a terrible 2023, mostly because I did not have any idea how a number of new features worked. I did much better in 2024.

This year in 41st in Peer Accuracy scores and 251st in Baseline accuracy. I have no idea how that stacks against all the other users, but it seems...not bad? Part of what limited my baseline is I only answered 49 questions out of almost 1k+ (though I may have bombed more if I answered more--who knows). TemetNoscoe #1 player answered 570 questions. Sheesh!! I finally figured out Peer Accuracy scores and in a way I prefer them as it's more of a comparison to how you did against other predictors in the questions you actually answered.

This question about refugees was a massive bomb for me :https://www.metaculus.com/questions/20784/ I also blew this one about two lunar landings: https://www.metaculus.com/questions/20919/ I got this terrible Andrea Bocelli question wrong, but outperformed everyone... https://www.metaculus.com/questions/30252/

Overall, I'm kind of grumpy about Metaculus. I hate the spread questions, which I just refuse to do anymore. The resolution criteria is often ridiculous. I don't know how much longer I'm going to play, but I do like feeling like I'm kind of able to do ok at predicting stuff.

How'd everyone (anyone?) else do?

Would you count graphic novels? then I'm up there with you :)

At 50, with some perspective, I can see the heaviest reading period of my life was between 10-28 yrs. For instance, I read Atlas Shrugged twice but I was around 16 and 25 when I did so. I read Guns, Germs and Steel around 30--that's 20 years ago! So, maybe, as a Mottizen, the answer is simply that a lot of us already "did the work." We value books and have the knowledge, it's just a bit dated.

Here's another thing that happened: at some point in middle age, I realized I was just zoning out and getting through books but not absorbing much. Now when I read, I (almost literally) go over every page three time to make sure I really 'get it.' Maybe this is my brain crusting over or maybe I've become a better reader, but it definitely slows my pace. 50 pages an hour seems recklessly high to me, though I could surely do a 100 page Dog Man book in under an hour.

Also, my interest in literature has plummeted that has had a pretty big effect on the number of books I read. I read more non-fiction lately, but removing fiction (almost entirely) has put a pretty big hole in my overall time window. I suppose I replaced it with comics, but no one wants to hear that!

I watch almost no TV (5-ish hours a week of Netflix), my doom-scrolling is minimal (though I waste hours writing replies that I often end up deleting), and I spend most of my free-time recording music in my studio. As a family man, start-up, artist guy, reading is a hobby I have limited time for and don't enjoy as much as I once did.

Regardless, 89 books in a year is a lot by any measure, IMO. Go ahead an flex. Regardless of wasted time, most adults just don't have it in them to do that. Joyfully wasting a day with a book is just not a possibility. Still, I know people who haven't read a book since they graduated from college. I don't think that's actually rare and it's a damn shame. If someone told me they read a ~300 page book every month, I'd probably give them a cookie.

Since the more intelligent people tend to have out-sized influence

I wonder about this...

A little from A, a little from B, a little from C and soon we've triangulated something approaching knowledge.

I was with this group since before it left /r/ssc's culture war thread (different username) but stepped back at some point in 2018 because I simply refused to ever use Reddit again. I think I had the link but never bothered to look...until recently. And it's all still here, just as you say. A few of my favorite names seem to be missing, but maybe, just like you, something will spark in their minds, a niggling question or event they can't quite parse and The Motte will be here to blow raspberries and hot-takes right into their soup.

I mostly dumped all social media around the same time, thoroughly unconvinced by its various claims of importance. Twitter is mendacity personified and dumbed down. I was pretty quick to follow Scott and others to Substack, but the social side of it didn't metastasize until this year. What I see there reminds me a lot of what I saw here: untamed, edgy, deeply intelligent weirdos who manage to mostly adhere to civil discourse and sometimes provide illumination where none seems apparent or forthcoming. I like to think of it as The Motte seeping beyond its borders and it makes me happy when I see names I recognize still doing their thing. Most online communities seem to evaporate after a few short years, yet here we remain. #FeelsGood

I'm not sure you're going to find may vids of Americans eating cow dung...maybe as a rare college prank?

I think the question "is it true for every nationality on Earth," is sort of the point. I'm less certain it is. I think India has special characteristics like, 1.2 billion people with an even larger gap in wealth than anywhere in the West. This opens the door for a broader range of pathological behavior--so in that sense, maybe if we all had a massive underclass we'd be eating poop too?

I think "should I update" is precisely the question. I wouldn't say I've got a high opinion of India, more true to say I think of it very little. But if India isn't "the Worst Country on earth" what is? Kulak sort of defends Africa as equally as poor but not as environmentally degraded or mad.

Anyway, I think there's definitely some bullshit racism going on in this video/review but there also is an important question about what elevates humanity vs. the depths to which we might sink: Eloi vs. Morlocks. For me it raises a longstanding and fundamental concern about the overwhelming power of human depravity, something I've worried about since I was a kid and 2 Live Crew was the hot thing.

let's see

avoided wading into previous ... discussions of the conflict, which have shocked me with their low quality, contentiousness, and total lack of intellectual charity.

Pretty much every time, not just here. I haven't seen any place anywhere that isn't completely on-sides, as it were. Same for Israel/Palestine. You will never see my opinion printed on the Interwebz. All cost, no profit.

No street-shitting for me

God bless you sir!

Thanks for the thoughtful reply! It seems to mostly fit my priors.

Like everything Kulak posts, his description of the film and its significance is bombastically overstated, emotionally overwrought, but with a kernel of truth.

agree. I find it over-the-top, but I'm still kind of glad it exists. I've lost the plasticity-of-mind to "go there" anymore.

I was hoping to get your feedback @mrvanillasky as I was aware you live in India and have criticisms thereof.

The movie... exists as agit prop Most of the world is completely aware of how bad, dirty, scammy the subcontinent is. The movie is not that deep, kulak just read too much into it since he's aware of India and Jayant Bhandari.

My sense, and I think something Kulak tries to say in his review is that the film is aggressively agit-prop, the AI prompt-maker "Thames" is actively trying to make something racist. Yet another reason I will avoid the film. Still...sometimes there's signal in the noise.

The movie exists to facilitate dunking on Hindu far right users

American far-right dunking on Indian far-right? to what end? "We're the true Aryan race!" kind of stuff? I would agree that this would appeal only to 4-chan-types--I can't imagine anyone I know on the Left watching this, let alone even hearing about it. The problem is that as much as everyone wants to put 4-chan in the garbage, it's got lasting power and some of the stuff on there become common knowledge 10 years later. As a "normie" it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff.

One thing I'm really interested in is the 'big picture.' It's been pretty clear to me since the 90's that American culture and IQ have been dropping like a stone in the Mariana Trench. At 50 I have the perspective to see how much worse things are at a baseline level. Is India just the destination for any human culture that doesn't have perpetual warfare, slavery, famine, etc.? Is there any solution that doesn't require a "Final Solution", i.e. genocide? Do Indians have any sense that the situation can be repaired? I presume a leftist POV would be that education and female empowerment will reduce birth rates and boost the lower caste. The right..I don't know, they seem fine with dehumanizing the low-caste/class and forcibly sterilizing them. One can have empathy but what's the right amount necessary to fix the problem of human devolution?

I just read Kulak's review of "India: The Worst Country on Earth" on his Substack, Anarchonomicon. https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/film-review-india-the-worst-country

I had never heard of this film and haven't seen it, but I have read other stuff from Kulak. While there are definitely points I take from his posts, I do not consider myself a confederate and find his takes to be pretty divergent and extreme from my own. His writing is solid enough I don't get bored so I consider him an example of "what a reasonably intelligent far-right person has to say." He might not be far-right, but I think that's how he identifies. I'm certainly no expert, I've read maybe 4 or 5 articles and I seem to remember him from Reddit...maybe? I would be glad to hear other opinions/warning/lauds.

In his review he claims the film is

  1. true and accurate (from use of primary source online material)
  2. a perfect piece of right-wing propaganda
  3. unwatchable by almost everyone (4-chan trolls are the exception) beyond the 16 minute mark
  4. An important film that forces Jeffersonian "All men are created equal" types to reformulate their world view

Now that I know the film exists, will I watch it? No, I think it's unlikely. I don't really harbor Pollyanna-ish views on India that need to be rewired, but I also don't get into watching death, rape and destruction in my free time. I find it psychically damaging and can admit I prefer ignorance to knowing the true depth of human depravity. The review reminded me a lot of how people would describe "Faces of Death" back when I was a kid--another film I never had any interest in watching and remain largely ignorant of, aside from knowing it's just watching an endless string of people getting horribly killed.

I would like to know if people here are familiar with the film and what their general impressions are. I would also like to discuss some of the following:

  1. Is it true? Can a feature-film length series of horrible phone videos give us an accurate view of what India is really like? I have no experience with the country beyond discussions with people who have been there or come from there and some low-level Youtube vids. Is this really the worst country on Earth? If so, what's the deal with the subcontinet? Is this level of degeneration directly tied to IQ? If not what caused India (I think there's some talk that Pakistan and Bangladesh are in the same boat) to be like this? If this is human degeneracy, what keeps a society from degenerating? Are we degenerating? Is India the future for everyone?

  2. Is it perfect RW propaganda? Kulak's point is that it is so disturbing it forces Westerners to adopt an "Ohmygod the West is so much better than this I'll defend it with my life," attitude. I would suspect that hardcore universalists and "brotherhood-of-man-types" would find ways of countering the narrative, but I wouldn't be satisfied with, "it's just nasty fascist racists," if the truth content is high. Bad people can have high signal-to-noise ratio content even if I don't like it.

  3. Is it really that bad? The horrible deaths and mutilation parts I might be able to stomach, but the accounts of the varieties of rape and abuse had me squirming just in their retelling. The scenes of ecological devastation and anti-sanitation sound almost as bad. Is India truly this decrepit and insane or is it just a white-power-washing of a place I'm meant to develop a revulsion towards so I have the correct opinon of H-1B visas? would watching the film bring me closer to understanding or just turn me into a gibbering racist? Should I go to India and see for myself? People I know who have gone there tell no happy tales so I'm biased toward believing it's as bad as they say.

  4. Is it important? Will this film actually pin itself to history? It's hard to claim that "Faces of Death" was an important series of films from any kind of cinematic or virtue position, but it did make an impact and we remember it. Is it possible that even as pure culture-war propaganda, it's message might actually help people, either by protecting themselves when they're in India or forcing the country/global community to force some changes on the culture? Does something like 'India:TWCoE' need to happen to turn the ship? Does the left need far-right propaganda thrown in their faces from time-to-time? Does the West need to understand how terrible things could become if they don't reverse their own degeneracy? Is this an argument for AI control of humanity or will we necessarily revert to the mean where we use warfare, colonialism and slavery to force the best genes to emerge...like, are we simply doomed?

Anyway, these are just some initial thoughts, but it seems like pure, uncut culture war and I thought y'all might have more perspective on this than me.

Sixthly

I love it!

literally no one said "we'd love to deport them, but it's easier to start with Mexicans.

Well, I don't presume it would be easier to throw out Mexicans--I'm saying it's easier to throw out people you gave H1-B visas to as opposed to people you can't find because you don't know who they are or where they went. they aren't merely here legally, but have been granted the esteemed blessing of the state, which can be revoked at any time.

now that the negative sentiment against it is becoming unmanageable, they're looking for ways to still get it under the guise of legal immigration

The US will have immigration always and forever. It's not a switch, it's a dial. The Biden admin, cranked it so far the knob came off. Whether or not H1-B should be expanded, decreased or eliminated is not a conversation of consequence. We're talking sub 100k numbers not multiple millions. The real immigration issue that voters care about --the millions of voters who crossed party lines or got off their asses to vote for Trump--is the open border. Almost no one cares or even thinks about H1-B visas. It was a foolish topic to even bring up--unless, of course, you're trying to muddy the waters and misdirect people's attention.

I think we can squish this into a prediction space. I don't care about H1-B visas but my prediction is "no change" (+/- 10k total approved visas) with 75% confidence. I think I predicted overall deportations somewhere else, but I expect that number (currently around 270k) to grow by no more than 10% by the midterm elections, 85% confidence. I think both H1-B will not change meaningfully, deportations will not grow meaningfully and the conversation will be about a failed discourse around H1-B to obfuscate the failure in securing the border and deporting the mass of migrants from the Biden era. I suppose we can make a bet if you want, or just see how I did in two years. I wouldn't hate to be wrong...

I would use the word 'protracted.'

I think if one is under 50, one might be forgiven for not realizing the US had been itching to go to war with the Taliban for years prior to 9-11. The minute the second plane hit I knew we were going into Afghanistan. I wasn't a geo-politics genius, I'd simply been paying attention, maybe more than most because I was also in the military during the Clinton years. The Taliban rule prior to 9-11 was a massive improvement from what had been there before but we hated them for all the things we still hate about them now, plus they were destroying world heritage sites! Nothing has really changed except the US is poorer and totally demoralized. We utterly lost the war on terror.