ThenElection
No bio...
User ID: 622
ThenElection
2d ago
Warren Farrell would be a good example, but he is about a thousand miles away from the contemporary manosphere.
ThenElection
2d ago
guys like that were common 20 years ago, 50 years ago, and so on. Are they more common today? No, not really.
The misogynist basement dwelling rapist incel and the cock carousel riding woman are both myths. Not in the sense that there don't exist individuals who might qualify as those categories--sure, it's possible to find both. But their primary purpose isn't as labels meant to describe people you're likely to meet in physical reality, but to be symbolic avatars for people to project their deepest neuroses and fears onto.
The algorithm detects that people engage strongly with their neuroses and fears and so presents them more and more of the same. And so these virtual types end up displacing conceptions of the typical man and woman informed by interactions with real men and women.
ThenElection
3d ago
If you (or, more accurately, Trump) could convincingly guarantee a US victory as defined by either your total capitulation or stone age scenarios, those are outcomes I'd happily take, at least given the situation we are in now. But it's not all a given that those aims would be achievable or even plausible, even for an administration that had shown the ability to focus on something for more than a few weeks at a time without stepping on a rake.
There's reasonable ambiguity about how things are going to play out from this conflict, and I'm highly skeptical that either of your scenarios will come to pass. Most likely, the US will continue bombing for two or three months more, get bored, and move on without getting any resolution to the root issue, leading to bad foreseeable issues five or ten years from now. And that's kind of a best case scenario: significant ground troops, loss of a significant military asset, and even breaking out into a much broader, global war are also outside risks that still might present themselves.
ThenElection
3d ago
Even "don't do GOF research in a dense 10M+ megacity" would reduce the risk a lot.
It probably depends, but I know a radiologist who just finished their fellowship with an offer for >$500k, not in the boondocks. Another friend (more mid career) is an allergist at $250k, but working only part time. It doesn't seem that implausible for someone to get into seven figures income, though I don't have a sense of how common that is. Maybe you need to start a private practice for that? Or are those well and truly dead?
More options
Context Copy link