ThisIsSin
Like a wild animal, the threat to our body was coming right for us
No bio...
User ID: 822
Women want more status as mothers
No, they want more privilege. "Status as mothers" is a strange excuse considering most of them aren't, but it fools people who think women are acting in good faith here (or "conservatives" for short).
In this case, we see they want the privilege to back out of being a mother at any time, not just before birth.
It's literally just the abortion debate, but post-partum this time. The male analog here is "I could never be a deadbeat dad, so I'll just kill everyone here because [insert Clancy's defenses here]".
The cultural correlations between homosexual conduct and child abuse are sufficiently strong that even in the mid-20th century it was common to use the word "pederast" to describe a gay man as such.
As opposed to the 21st, where the cultural correlations between heterosexual conduct and child abuse are sufficiently strong that it's common to use the word "pedophile" to describe a straight man as such.
(previously, the "age of consent" was different in part based on sexuality)
It's still that way. It's normal for all sexualities that are outside the sphere of concern for feminists (who worked very hard for the above swap), and infinite for the one inside of it. (On paper, the laws are the same; in practice, courts are functionally mandated to treat retroactive revocation of consent as legitimate and still hold men who are statutorily raped responsible for any resulting child, so we see it only ever privileges women.)
[Waiting until college to have their sexual awakening...] but this typically results in or requires [characters] that have an unhealthy relationship with their sexuality... and kinda dodges the matter rather than resolving it.
Oh, so exactly like real life then.
but there's a pretty large faction of Red Tribers that do recognize 16-17 age sexuality as something that happens
So basically, the culture that takes a more complimentary posture towards men- in contrast to the one that's built upon maximal exploitation "minimizing men's evil desires"- has a healthier and more constructive picture of how sexuality works.
Perhaps moving in that direction is superior to moving in the opposite direction- but of course, any hint of that would mean more stuff for your blocklists. The amount of un-consensual and un-good in the world would increase.
I'm kind of surprised it's not a bigger deal among the AI-hating crowd.
Well, I wouldn't want to share a demographic with a mass shooter either, especially not one whose victims were perfectly sympathetic.
Eventually an AI will do something that can sort-of somehow plausibly be linked to something like killing children
This has already happened a bunch of times. I think Tumbler Ridge was the first mass murder where those conditions were true; there were a few scattered suicides before that, but nobody really cared about those guys.
(One imagines much jealousy by state organizations responsible for fighting this sort of thing; they at least have to make house calls to convince some retard from $group to do it. At least the AI hasn't gone full Eagle Eye... that we know of, at least.)
It's not just some demand that people near and far must all conform.
Indeed, it's also the murder of those people if they won't.
Well, socialists believe those rich people are absconding with resources that don't belong to them.
The earliest recorded socialist was Cain, who believed (trivially, correctly) that Abel was obtaining God's favor with resources that don't belong to him.
The first act of socialism ever practiced by humanity was redistributing Abel all over the ground.
From Cain's perspective, Abel obtaining God's favor that way was stealing (and purposefully ignores "obtaining God's favor" is the entire reason those resources were put there in the first place: "obtaining God's favor" and "being better than Cain" were one and the same for Cain, though).
Interestingly, the punishment for that was not death, but exile and divine protection from anyone else murdering him. (And the even more interesting implication is that Cain having done this doesn't seem to be stated as categorically/unequivocally evil, either.)
I don’t think I would want mass migration from Europe today
I don't think Americans (in the immigration case) would tolerate the 19th/20th-century-style policy you'd need, which is this, so that would almost certainly be bad.
Musk easily fit in
Musk fits into the American civil religion very well; he is the most financially successful African-American in history. One imagines opposition to the kind of power he has to be the fault of mere racism.
- Prev
- Next

Your question answers itself (emphasis mine).
More options
Context Copy link