ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
No bio...
User ID: 822
However if you prefer, let us taboo the term "racism" and instead discuss "racial identitarianism".
The same should also be done for "sexism" -> "sex/gender identitarianism", which not only covers feminism/gynosupremacy, but LGBT/homosupremacy too.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
20d ago
Honestly, in terms of the symbols of those Olympic games, I preferred the Goatse submission [SFW]. The "Lisa Simpson blowjob" one just didn't hit the same way.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
20d ago
Maybe I am inclined to believe that those who seek truth for the sake of truth do tend to come out with a "liberal" bias.
This is a tautology, but the reason they come out with a liberal bias is because these people are in fact worthy of the individual rights liberalism suggests exist inherent to every man simply because they naturally do this.
Not all who claim to be liberals are actually liberal, though- hell, that's why progressives call themselves "liberal" in the first place! The problem for true liberals post-1980 or so is that, because socioeconomic opportunity started to dry up around that time (as compared to the '50s-'70s), society started selling those rights with the belief they'd be rewarded with other things that, while they feel good to have, are less aligned with the truth. Short-term moral gains at the expense of long-term advancement: affirmative action, gynosupremacism/feminism, [inorganic at the time] gay marriage, further destruction of negative rights (parental rights, self-defense rights, "freeze peach", free association), etc.
So progressives dressed their corruption in the skinsuit of what liberalism was and carried on with the slogans. And this worked, for a time; the transition kept otherwise low-information liberals believing that they had inherited the movement, and so did the details of being for things like feminism and non-straight sexualities.
Around 2013 there was a Great Awokening... but it wasn't the progressives that woke up, it was the liberals realizing they needed to take back their own label. They found natural allies in the enemies of the progressives (which is why the average liberal is seen as "right-wing"- classical liberalism is a conservative view now) because they know, and knew, that liberals oppress them less than progressives will.
I feel more strongly that the painting of universities as institutions of
liberalprogressive indoctrination deny entire cohorts of students their own agency in developing political beliefs
I think that for any student in a liberal arts degree (including those who are only capable of that, and assuming this education is an accurate assessor of intelligence- the people for who that is not true tend not to emerge as progressives) progressivism is a natural adaptation because these people are in massive oversupply, and their policies are a natural reflection of this fact. That's why they need the absurd amounts of illegal immigration- after all, the easiest way to correct a problem of "too many chiefs, not enough indians" is simply to import a shit-ton of indians (literally, in many cases). As we might expect, academia was simply ahead of the curve here, because they were championing this stuff 20-30 years before this would become apparent to the average citizen.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
21d ago
Asking people to bend over backwards doesn't make sense to me.
The problem here is that this only goes one way. Respect’s a two way street, and if the response of, say, feminists once they’re on the high side of separate but equal start reinforcing that and solidifying that into privilege, the correct response is the iron fist present in that velvet glove, not further prostration.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
22d ago
Giving special quotas and handouts to females would be more blatantly discriminatory
Then the purpose of this system of divorcing "female" and "woman"- what it does- is to launder this exact thing through "if you're willing to deny the truth in a way that suits our orthodoxy you too can have some of the gibs".
Note that the group most opposed to this, that being a particular subset of 'females', are generally opposed to the fact this allows males to assume privileges currently granted to females, but not generally opposed to those [blatantly discriminatory] privileges existing in the first place.
Women who are opposed to those privileges existing are generally understood as gender traitors, much like how a white person in 1950 opposed to institutional privilege would be considered a race traitor. Those who believe in gyno-supremacy usually consider these types a lost cause outside of the occasional think-piece about cheating being good for you.
And saying that "males are trash" would be a lot more obviously hateful than "men are trash"
Gynosupremacists (when they retreat to their motte they call themselves 'feminist') use these words interchangeably for a reason; when they say the latter, they mean the former, as a worldview founded on sexism predicts.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
22d ago
4chan isn't fast moving any more either unless you're signed in (which defeats the entire purpose of being 'anonymous') and the site ultimately died in 2013 when moot picked the wrong side (Gamergate) for whatever reason.
The splinter sites are closer to Reddit where you can just splinter your own board if you don't like whatever moderation, which is a solution, but not necessarily a good one. 4chan's board structure was generally OK though it could have used some better indexing for general threads, which 4chan never evolved a solution to because it's ultimately permanently stuck in 2005 (and the splinter sites aren't better) and the network effect kept it alive.
4chan has survived exoduses before under similar conditions but, again, that was 12 years ago and things are different now.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
23d ago
The default position of humanity is sexist and racist (the only question is whose sexism is privileged, and to what degree).
We had a time when that was less true, back when we were rich and our philosopher-kings were half-decent people, but that's no longer true.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
26d ago
Blaming Biden for Ukraine being invaded is almost as bad as blaming Trump for COVID happening under his watch.
Funny, because I do blame both of them for those things.
For Biden: what the fuck else do you think Hunter was doing there? The Ds have been angling for that war for years and have been playing stupid games in Ukraine even back when he was VP.
For Trump: massive partisan riots broke out and weren't controlled. Law and order gave way to burn, loot, murder in literally every major city and he did what, hold a Bible upside down? And the money printing began under him- the Ds continued it, sure, but that was a bad move from the get-go.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
26d ago
According to Trump (or Tony Schwartz) one of the key skills of a sucessful negotiator is the ability to remain focused on what is rather than what ought to be, or what people say.
Sure, but now we have what appears [to me] to be tactically-inconsistent backpedaling. Enhanced high-tech manufacturing capabilities were supposed to [by who?] be the goal but now only token tariffs remain in the most important areas- and yes, the US has weaknesses in this area that are so significant that major Chinese manufacturing firms being told to suspend shipments of that equipment to the US is probably a bigger deal than most give it credit for. The Americans might indeed not be in any position to unilaterally establish independent industry at this time.
And while people do indeed have incredibly short memories- people barely remember 2020-2022 these days and that economic cataclysm dwarfs any economic disturbance tariffs have caused (oh, market fell 10%? I don't hear reparations for the 30% inflation over the last 4 years in addition to all the authoritarian shit so I don't fucking care!)- my main problem is that the negotiations are highly public, but the timeframe is not.
Let's take the whole 51st State thing as an example. I feel that to start trying to accomplish that goal... well, the economic tactics are sound ones, but there's only a concept of a plan here, nothing more substantive [as perceived by the general public].
When working on any project, the answer to most questions [from a stability/investment mindset] cannot actually be the Underpants Gnomes strategy; we pour foundations so that we can accomplish the next step of the process, but to pour those foundations the finished product needs to be coherent. Is it self-sufficiency, like petroleum? Is it simply reduced dependence with an eye towards self-sufficiency? The last major economic reformer in US history, FDR, had the fireside chat specifically for this reason- massive and immediate reforms benefit from someone explaining why. That should be Vance, since he's capable of doing this whereas Trump is... very not, but I'm not hearing anything.
And doubly so if we're going to see dealmaking consistently in public- whereas right now, we just have the disruption. And yes, this sort of thing absolutely is bad for American provinces like Canada and the EU; to the point that I see the offer of statehood as an early buy-out package for performers capable of being disruptive to larger goals before the layoffs begin... which, you'll recall, was exactly what was occurring around that time.
I've been seeing comments here about how trump is "erratic", "stupid", "illiterate", and a "retard", about how he's going to tank the economy and usher in a new age of Democratic party rule, about how his supporters are all deep-throating cock-slobberes who deserve to lose everything.
The only real criticism is "erratic", the other ones are all just incoherent screaming (same with "corrupt"; I have yet to hear how substantiated/used outside of a thought-terminating argument).
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
27d ago
Trying to redefine "purpose" to be about outcomes instead of intent is a silly linguistic game that I have no patience for.
It's meaningful with the implication that you're saying this to hold those within those systems to account.
When those in charge of systems are hostile, or the system is set up to allow value drift (let's take BLM as a system- the official statement was black lives matter, where what it actually did was burn loot murder), those who created the system rightfully should be held to account for either allowing the goals of the system to be hijacked [mistake theory] or was intended that way from the start and the declared intentions were lies [conflict theory].
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
27d ago
Well, then their receiving countries can reorient themselves to take advantage of their returning human capital.
If they don’t, perhaps because those politics (that their researchers are more aligned with) inherently won’t let them, who am I to tell them that the perpetuation of those politics is a net-negative for humanity because it means objective progress is sacrificed? Clearly they believe those politics more important, and far be it from me to interrupt their mistakes, or even categorize them as such.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
27d ago
Losing these people would result in serious brain drain
Perhaps, but the Europeans have demonstrated a complete inability to make use of them either; it's a question of "they work in the US and the work gets done", or "they go home and receive half pay for doing nothing".
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
27d ago
Ok, so forced arbitration then military action.
I think the current English order is evil enough to order them shot as a motivator if no alternative can be found; whether the soldiers actually pull the triggers when so ordered is another matter.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
27d ago
Does anyone have some color on why Japans population decline slowed and Koreas did not?
Japan is a larger nation, with more economic opportunity, and it industrialized at a time when industrialization wasn't quite so automated- the percentage of the population that process enriched was larger.
South Korea is small, has one major city, and it industrialized at a time when automation was already a relatively solved problem- the percentage of the population that process enriched was smaller.
Both nations, as well as all Western ones (importantly, the US is the least affected), are overpopulated to varying degrees relative to their level of economic opportunity- that's why TFR is below 2 there. It's not "the young aren't doing their duty", it's that the positions that the young would grow into no longer exist and their very existence has been, for a variety of reasons, simply priced out of the market (you can also see this effect in gender relations, where women instinctively expect men to make more than them- which means that the carrying capacity of society is not equal, and furthermore that men are in surplus).
When populations shrink, capital pays more for labor- that's why, historically, massive economic booms occur after significant die-offs. What you're seeing is a slower, gentler version of that process.
The North Koreans are not capable of winning a war on South Korea and still remaining North Korea through domestic production alone- if they had enough domestic production to sustain a war they would have industrialized to the point the socioeconomic forces that hold the country together would be destroyed- too many people getting rich for the Kim regime to be able to delete.
China could do it, of course- just dump more materiel onto the NK army than they're able to carry- but then, apart from no longer being a base from which the United States could attack the Chinese mainland, what grand benefit would they get from reducing the country to rubble? Certainly not a trading partner, that's for sure, since NK has no industry and their people are poorer than China's own in the first place. It's not like Ukraine where the Russians can somewhat credibly claim they're making the territory safe for ethnic Russians; Koreans aren't Han Chinese and the two hate each other on that basis alone.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
28d ago
And modern polite white society doesn't seem to have any kind of defense against women's tears.
This refusal to work is that defense.
Weil's disease and hantavirus are suddenly major concerns. And, as the average daily temperature rises, the already-unspeakable miasma is getting worse.
Then the way I see it, the women have two choices- they can deal with it themselves (unlikely), or they can accept that their unwillingness to do certain types of labor makes that labor inherently more valuable.
I expect either forced arbitration or military action (financial or otherwise) will come next, perhaps both at the same time; this is a threat to the Two-Tier English order. (Ever wonder why China censors discussion of 'lying flat'? Now you know).
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
28d ago
Their perspective hasn't been represented anywhere that I've found.
Yes, that's called "trans erasure". These women are performing opposite-, or rather trans-, gender roles- therefore, opinion discarded for doing work incompatible with one's gender.
Doubly so because they're gender traitors- again, traditionalist and progressive thought both agree that men owe women just for existing, so what are these women doing working, and why are they co-operating with men?
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
29d ago
For example, if a country which does not have a domestic car industry puts a VAT specifically on cars, it is effectively a tariff.
Or to name another famous European case, if a union of countries that do not have a domestic tech industry demands data to be handled in specific ways or face an absurdly huge fine (or 5% of global revenue, whichever is higher).
The Europeans naturally claim it's about data privacy, but the fact of the matter is that unless you do business everywhere the European way, you face the massive tax. Naturally, European startup companies will have no problem doing things the European way, and as such the GDPR is effectively a tariff.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
29d ago
Just stimulation of a different sort, I guess? I don't understand why rimming/being rimmed would be appealing at all outside of dom/sub dynamics but it also appears too often to just be coincidence.
I would expect this to be a preference somewhat affected by porn as well simply because the concept of anal is obvious to basically everyone, but normal enough in porn that it doesn't seem completely absurd. As far as practical matters go it's more difficult, and these things are a more limited version of that. Of course the usual suspects blow that out of proportion and complain that "girls are being asked for anal as soon as the third date", but the whores left the barn on that matter 60 years ago.
thus stimulation of the perineum can result in arousal
There's a reason prostate exams are a meme, and it's an orgasm modifier for when you get bored/want variety (intensity can come from novelty). I don't know what the equivalent is for women, if there is one, due to the inherent lack of that part, though there are probably a few things you could do in that case if you fill both holes (I don't believe reach-arounds are uniquely a male/male thing).
To say nothing of anal beads
Grip 'em and rip 'em, like you're pull-starting an old lawnmower; I'm told that really gets the motor running [SFW]. In all seriousness, the reason you'd use that is because pushing things in there is actually rather painful, so being able to break that up rather than continually insert an approximation of a cylinder is important mostly while going in. (There's only one Kirk Johnson, you know.) That's also why the plugs are shaped the way they are- it's generally uncomfortable to continually have that part stretched that far, which is why they taper off at the base then flare out again (so you can grab it for extraction).
As far as constantly talking about it... it's Reddit, what do you expect. It's not like 4chan where, while you could always do this, you'll also get 70 replies calling you and everyone else a fag for posting about it.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
29d ago
I'm surprised it took you that long to watch it; I've started to forget how good it is.
Actually, I think it hits all the high points of sex and cultural norm violations, including but not limited to:
- States outright that some
racesspecies are different than others, and different people may or may not enjoy different aspects of that - Sex with women is Good, Actually/not being afraid of the natural consequences of the [offers resources vs. offers sex] condition that underpins human instinct
- Even the women do this from time to time too
- Gender-swapping/having both sets of equipment without going Full Trans(tm)
- Some of the main characters both look and act younger than 18 (standard fig leaf of Being Over 900 Years Old applies)
And perhaps most importantly, all of those things are portrayed in a natural way; it's clearly not done with the sole purpose of being edgy/iconoclastic.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
29d ago
Trump's problem is that a big chunk of his passionate supporters are retirees with 401ks.
A 30% drop in a retiree's 401k is "it's going back to 2019 levels" due to the massive amount of inflation (also 30%) the previous government caused protecting this particular group at everyone else's expense.
And I think a lot of shy Tories Trump voters know that. And no, that doesn't make paying back taxes any less fun; I believe that Trump made it as fun as such a thing possibly could have been. But the missing money needs to come from somewhere, and if it doesn't come at the sole expense of the youth of the country for once that's the biggest step forwards for this country in almost 60 years- bonus points if they remember that.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
30d ago
Shotacon's a porn genre; that's why he's called that in the show (the 'u' in his name is silent in both sub and dub). The author of this work has others that play this a bit straighter but it's worth noting the relationships his characters have are generally constructive, not destructive.
The interesting part of it is that the most difficult parts/negotiations of the typical male and female relationship dynamic are standing on their head or taken for granted. The thing about the casual awkward sex-type button-pushing is that normally the man is supposed to offer something to the woman and in return she'll show him her tits, but in this case, the man can't offer anything except best effort and the woman is trying to stuff her tits in his face before he's proven himself; the inverse of how a typical relationship is supposed to function.
The other thing about Shouta is that he's, well, innocent. He approaches [what is basically God] like a child would (Kobayashi does this too, but in a slightly different way)- hence the nervousness to accept the gifts offered him (and the apprehension about accepting them publicly; he does share a bed with her, after all, and they do have a kid in the spinoff), but it's worth noting he does accept them (considering that he does care for Lucoa and doesn't want her to go away, and is worried about doing that by accident).
It is noteworthy that in Christianity, this is repeatedly stated to be the way God works; so just extend that principle out to everything rather than just the sexual angle and... there you have it.
What may raise eyebrows are some of the additions.
Wait, the War Department Department of Defense isn't usually considered a national security department? If that isn't, one wonders what is.
This isn't raising eyebrows to me because a lot of this stuff seems trivially correct.
- Obviously, agencies with the power to ban all development of certain resources critical to national security qualify
- Obviously, agencies that are in charge of keeping the electricity and natural gas working qualify
- Obviously, agencies with the opportunity to destroy the economy over something stupid, like the uncommon cold, qualify
- Obviously, agencies with the authority to arbitrarily declare food-producing practices as unsafe qualify
Stuff that has more gradual bad outcomes, like the Department of Education (not listed in this order), would be more of a stretch simply because their negligence degrades the country over long periods of time, not potentially overnight.
But I think this does add another bit of evidence that Trump's chaos has some deliberate intent that often gets lost in the media chaos that follows him.
The ultimate problem with Trump II is that he's a reformer in a country that has hit the Snooze button on reform since late 2001 for some or other distraction- blowing up 10-dollar camels with 2 million dollar missiles, causing 30% inflation because some people couldn't be bothered to wear masks, whatever the fuck Trump I was, and Yes We Can discover that black Presidents are just as useless as white Presidents.
I have to admit that I'm a little jealous, since European countries are actively cracking down on reform parties and jailing their members for something everyone does (they're far more progressive-traditionalist than the liberal Americans), the UK public actively prefers Two-Tier state policy, and the Canadians are too busy bitching about checks notes being offered a vote on policies that affect them to bother with reform (which would make it more likely they survive as a whole country).
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
1mo ago
hard to keep judging kids so hard for their Skibidi Toilets or whatever
I judge people for Skibidi Toilet not for the staying power of the meme itself, but simply because it's low effort compared to what came before it.
Actually, I don't know what's considered edgy any more. I remember the Newgrounds school shooting Pico games, which were... something else, certainly, but I don't think I ever saw anything quite as absurd after that.
ThisIsSin
Cainanites and Abelists
1mo ago
I really wish it was possible to search flash cartoons.
The Flashpoint Archive might have you covered.
Oh, no, they have “stop flushing the fucking paper towels” in the factories, too. At least it’s a sign they know how to flush it, I guess.
More options
Context Copy link