ThisIsSin
Pareo distribution: whereby 20% of the fabric shows 80% of the body
No bio...
User ID: 822
ThisIsSin
Pareo distribution: whereby 20% of the fabric shows 80% of the body
13hr ago
the raw social power that caused wokeness
The raw social power that caused wokeness was basically just the revolution turning on itself after achieving its original goal. Women at large pounded the laws flat (the ones that would have prevented the transgender 'enforcers'; the 1950s would have solved this with them being genocided physically removed with the requisite violence), then the Devil turned 'round on them.
They don't have the 'cultural' (for lack of a better word) vocabulary to stop the badness- and why would they, being that men generally do that for them.
Are the trans sex pests running the universities?
No, they're just the enforcers/auditors of the power of the subset of [the striver women] who are running them.
TERF gynosupremists wouldn't even let transphobic men come to their aid?
How many black members did the KKK have? Why do you think that would be? (Was it for lack of effective outreach, perhaps?)
ThisIsSin
Pareo distribution: whereby 20% of the fabric shows 80% of the body
15hr ago
· Edited 15hr ago
I don't think my woke friends (who are male and female, of course) are betraying the revolution for personal gain?
From the point of view of the original gynosupremacists, "let's declare supremacy over all men" turning into "except if they put on a dress, then they have even greater privileges than women ever did" (and are given the permission to be even greater sex pests than they ever were before) is pretty blatantly a betrayal. A real "4 legs good, 2 legs better" moment.
Naturally, those who are trying to do it don't see it that way.
I don't get the sense at all that trans activism is a frustrated men's rights movement
That is what I said- it's mostly woman vs. woman here, nothing to do with men (outside of their being an incidental/token). [Insert stereotype where men think it's all about them here.]
"Women at fault" is called "internalized patriarchy" or something
Kind of. That phrase is generally used to complain about there being any standards for female behavior, but it runs out of steam once you're past the initial conditions of the revolution outside of a meme to convince low-information/former revolutionaries.
It does make me laugh that the reason women who want to maintain their privileges can't in part because they forgot to invite any men (in the sense that there are very few men who actually understand women enough to effectively argue/aid against the ways women go to excess), though.
ThisIsSin
Pareo distribution: whereby 20% of the fabric shows 80% of the body
17hr ago
recognize that any comprehensive moral order is a religion, whether it has gods or not.
And we already have examples of this that are also very clearly religions- Confucianism and Buddhism. Western thought, as always, tends to be colored by "[everything we hate about/a strawman of/how wrong about everything is] Chrstianity", and then the reactionaries respond with [everything they love about/how right about everything is their version of] Christianity.
So they end up talking past each other.
"State-mandated girlfriends" continues to be a popular political kickback.
(Actually, that's another clear "betrayed the revolution" marker there- women fought that battle specifically to minimize the amount of sexual welfare/unwanted taxes that could be demanded of them. Now, witness the vanguard bravely trying to force them back into paying sexual welfare to pay back their Brave Allies. As Britain proves, this is also a tax disproportionately levied against the poor.)
More options
Context Copy link