ThisIsSin
One big family Thanksgiving dinner that never ends
No bio...
User ID: 822
ThisIsSin
One big family Thanksgiving dinner that never ends
10hr ago
I have no idea how a judge said that with a straight face as he ordered a child to pay child support
I get that this is rhetorical, but here's the actual answer:
He ordered a man to pay child support.
A man is not a child, and being male takes precedence; furthermore, men can't be raped (their age of consent is 0- no Woman would ever actively want to fuck a man so this doesn't create any downstream problems, especially the most objectively attractive kind of Woman, that being a 16 year old one). The male gender role is to do the fucking, so this was Consensual, thus forcing him to take Responsibility makes trivial sense.
The only reason we pretend men can be raped is just basic gender equality, but that's just a fig leaf: they get the title but none of the protections that being a victim of the same grants Women. If we could get away with it, we would set the age of consent for Women to be infinite, even within the confines of a marriage (because otherwise, a Woman couldn't have Her husband thrown in jail if he displeased Her by retroactively revoking consent -> claiming marital rape, as all sex with Women is illegal).
TL;DR It was base human instinct.
ThisIsSin
One big family Thanksgiving dinner that never ends
12hr ago
In the Western world, the law is both
"You were the owner/prison warden of your wife, if anyone else had sex with her you were clearly in on it or negligent in your duties as a husband."
and
"The wife has zero duties whatsoever, including the duty not to get pregnant with another man's child. If a husband attempts to assert any duty, he will be punished."
at the same time.
ThisIsSin
One big family Thanksgiving dinner that never ends
12hr ago
if the man and woman are married
I'm not sure where you're from, but on planet Earth, cheating is generally cause for not being married any more, notably even in religions that are normally incompatible with divorce.
It not being the husband's kid is undeniable evidence that this happened, and further, undeniable evidence that the wife concealed that fact. (The mother is not confused- the baby comes out of the mother.)
The purpose of this law is simply to limit the woman's liability for cheating in a relationship, while leaving it unlimited for the man (any intent behind that is an exercise for the reader). It's consistent with the other laws that limit the duties the woman has to the man in a marriage.
ThisIsSin
One big family Thanksgiving dinner that never ends
12hr ago
Just reversing the gender roles shows how insane this can be. A grown woman and little kid. The woman wants kids, the boy does not. The wife manages to get pregnant without the kid's consent (since this was is rape by law).
The boy then must pay child support to the woman for the raising of the kid.
Literally legal precedent in the US.
What proportion of those are Blue?
Genetic testing in this case would protect the man and bind the Woman. Obviously not going to fly in a gynosupremacist environment.
More options
Context Copy link