@ThisIsSin's banner p

ThisIsSin

Tomboy miscegenation

2 followers   follows 3 users  
joined 2022 September 06 05:37:32 UTC

				

User ID: 822

ThisIsSin

Tomboy miscegenation

2 followers   follows 3 users   joined 2022 September 06 05:37:32 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 822

You don't believe that sex is labor. Not really.

The baseline reality of a sexually dimorphic species is quite literally just this. I've talked about this before, and you know that.
We can pretty it up with a bunch of things- something about "inherent dignity" or whatever (which can be valid, if you can command enough violence to enforce it)- but at the end of the day this is the condition.

Because then a rapist isn't a violator of a woman's chastity, but merely a robber of a stranger sort.

Robbery is the main crime, but rape also generally involves a bunch of other more interesting types of robbery (assault and unlawful confinement being the usual two, but there are others). Those things also come with significant costs that push the cost of that action far beyond the 300-600 dollars a naive assessment would suggest.

First one's always free.

Apparently, we didn’t realize hijackings could be suicidal.

You don't need the TSA precisely because, since 2001, every passenger has had it drilled into them they're the last line of defense and that if you let a hijacking go, you're going to die. This isn't the '70s or '80s where hijackers were annoying but mostly harmless- it is that kind of population that needs the TSA, not the modern one where everyone knows they're an existential threat.

If you're going to die in an intentional plane crash at any time past that point, it's because the plane hijacked itself pilot did it on purpose, and the locked door kept the passengers out until it was too late.

This is exploitative because it forces people to perform actions they shouldn't be forced to perform.

I_consent_I_consent_I_dont.jpg

Meanwhile, the exchange of labor for money is inherent to... reality.

Sex is labor, usually performed in exchange for vital resources (modern welfare states excepted). Even the feminists acknowledge this, though considering feminism is in a very literal sense a union of the dedicated sex-laborer gender, and a cartel interested in driving the price of that sex as high as possible (and your "shouldn't" happens to be one of their slogans), I'm not sure how much credit they deserve for pointing that out.

but this is fundamentally different from saying exchanging labor for money is inherently exploitative

No it isn't, per the above.

Unless the argument is that labor itself is inherently demeaning and degrading, in which case Marx just has an irreconcilable problem with reality itself

No further comment.

that by all rights ought

Who "ought" decide that? You can say "the community", but there's nothing that backs that up outside of its members' capacity for violence in the service of reaching a consensus. Which is kind of just how socialism works.

corruption refers to a specific set of practices, many if which are illegal and most of which violate ethics rules

No, corruption is the idea that your personal goals are so important that you're willing to break the law to accomplish them. Antifa, therefore, is simply corruption by another name.

and holding certain opinions isn't illegal

It isn't illegal to be a member of the Mafia either, but they're never punished for that; they're punished for the evil, corrupt actions that naturally arise from that idea taken to its logical conclusion.

'There can't be any "members" of Antifa. It's just an idea, not an organization, bro.'

"Corruption" is just an idea too; that doesn't stop us from punishing those who advance its cause.

Man I always complete forget that the Zumwalt exists

Yeah, it's a stealth ship, that's how it works.

But that gets too close to the truth of the matter: illegals are an invading army, and they were actively aided in their invasion of the US by the people in power at the time, English Civil War-style. (Which is why the domestics responded, correctly, by voting for the guy who promised to send his army after them.)

That the foreign soldiers should be treated differently than the domestic soldiers (Blue's other pet demographics, as they carry out the violence they wish they were doing to those with something to lose) would just be too much, because it would open the door to using it on other useful-to-Blue demographics (or "racism" for short). It's also not something you can really turn against Reform as easily, because Establishment benefits disproportionately from the ability to make the process the punishment- that's not something you could do if you have the right to a speedy trial a more efficient tribunal system, and certainty of being punished for bad laws speed-camera-style generally results in an stronger impulse from the population to reform them.

and they should have a plan to protect children just in case

Why? Those children serve as the hair trigger for the tripwire force (they've learned well from Hamas), and you don't even have to arm them for them to be effective in that role. Aggressively putting them in danger like that is kind of the point.

At least if they do get killed you don't have to wait very long for their replacements- it takes 14-16 years for a militarily-effective male to grow, but little girls can play the part of "cry for the cameras while being on fire" in as few as 5 or 6. Lightning fast by comparison. (Dead babies aren't quite as photogenic.)

you might end up with a legitimate secessionist movement

It's kind of already here. It doesn't have as much support in the cities (NDP voters [progressives] are 95-5 against, UCP voters [traditionalist-liberals] are 60-40 for, UCP is majority party) but it's clear to every Westerner (and Easterner, for that matter) under 40 that they'll never be permitted to win an election in this country- outside of one 4-year period they never have.

It's treated as absurd, as if QC has the exclusive right to agitate so

QC is different because they don't actually need to hold the executive to get what they want.

AB, by contrast, has to hold the executive; if it doesn't the Easterners just team up to block everything. Older AB residents are probably made happier by the Carney regime's recent overtures about more development... but those aren't really his policies, and even the CPC voted for those bills. I don't think it's as reliable a signal of "well they're going to vote LPC at the first opportunity", this is the bare minimum that the LPC believes has to happen for the country not to splinter.

every single conservative leader is prima facie suspicious

This is because, from the only politically relevant perspective in Canada (Easterners), they are foreigners.

I can't really overstate that enough. Western Canada is a foreign country to them, and that means their political parties are foreign too- CPC and NDP both. The NDP collapsed because it was indistinguishable from the LPC (and is why its only seats are out in the West).

You never vote for a foreigner in a crisis, Trump is the Worst Thing Ever to the Eastern Boomers, QED.

This isn't that complicated, unless you're of the opinion that Canada is a political monolith (which polls tend to do, for reasons that at least rhyme with manufacturing consensus).

Why should anyone bother voting Conservative if it just means tax cuts and infinity immigrants?

That's why they lost the last 2 elections. This is why PP continues to have that mandate, by the way- at least he's saying Reform things this time rather than "but we should bend over backwards for whatever Karen of Toronto wants". You can't win that way, you see.

The NDP was the other counterbalance for reform, but they're arch-Conservatives now, which is why they're so indistinguishable from the LPC that most of their MPs are LPC now.

we may see Canada simply become a one-party two-bit petrostate.

If the petrostate part of the petrostate isn't smart [or powerful] enough to prevent that, and content with losing elections for ever, then it will be so.

it will create a decade-plus backlog of appeals in a system that is already not fit for purpose.

Nonsense, this is the system working as intended. Who's going to hold it to account? Clearly, voting doesn't matter- whatever party rep you selected is just going to go LPC anyway becuase fuck you, that's why.

What's even more insane is that legacy Canadian media appears to be supporting this push for his deportation to be waived.

Media system working exactly as it's intended to.

the Liberals have managed to somewhat skillfully defuse immigration as the bomb around their neck

Immigration was never a bomb around the LPC's neck, though: it helps exclusively their voters, and that's the only Canadian that matters.

See, LPC voters care about two things, and two things only: the price of their house, and flapping their jowls at the US (and any liberal reforms in that direction; the LPC is a Conservative party, not a classically liberal one). Carney is objectively the best candidate for those things, and that's clearly good enough for a dictatorship.

but the sheer number of them in such a short span of time, let alone to form a majority government, is entirely novel.

Yes, the government just straight up refusing to respect the results of the election is extremely novel for Canada.

Question is, of course, if anyone's going to care about that; or if the people that do care the most (i.e. people who don't live in Ottawa) are simply going to decide to quit. Sure, oil prices being higher helps those people in particular, but who knows if that's going to last.