ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
No bio...
User ID: 822
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
20hr ago
Apparently, we didn’t realize hijackings could be suicidal.
You don't need the TSA precisely because, since 2001, every passenger has had it drilled into them they're the last line of defense and that if you let a hijacking go, you're going to die. This isn't the '70s or '80s where hijackers were annoying but mostly harmless- it is that kind of population that needs the TSA, not the modern one where everyone knows they're an existential threat.
If you're going to die in an intentional plane crash at any time past that point, it's because the plane hijacked itself pilot did it on purpose, and the locked door kept the passengers out until it was too late.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
20hr ago
This is exploitative because it forces people to perform actions they shouldn't be forced to perform.
I_consent_I_consent_I_dont.jpg
Meanwhile, the exchange of labor for money is inherent to... reality.
Sex is labor, usually performed in exchange for vital resources (modern welfare states excepted). Even the feminists acknowledge this, though considering feminism is in a very literal sense a union of the dedicated sex-laborer gender, and a cartel interested in driving the price of that sex as high as possible (and your "shouldn't" happens to be one of their slogans), I'm not sure how much credit they deserve for pointing that out.
but this is fundamentally different from saying exchanging labor for money is inherently exploitative
No it isn't, per the above.
Unless the argument is that labor itself is inherently demeaning and degrading, in which case Marx just has an irreconcilable problem with reality itself
No further comment.
that by all rights ought
Who "ought" decide that? You can say "the community", but there's nothing that backs that up outside of its members' capacity for violence in the service of reaching a consensus. Which is kind of just how socialism works.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
1d ago
corruption refers to a specific set of practices, many if which are illegal and most of which violate ethics rules
No, corruption is the idea that your personal goals are so important that you're willing to break the law to accomplish them. Antifa, therefore, is simply corruption by another name.
and holding certain opinions isn't illegal
It isn't illegal to be a member of the Mafia either, but they're never punished for that; they're punished for the evil, corrupt actions that naturally arise from that idea taken to its logical conclusion.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
1d ago
'There can't be any "members" of Antifa. It's just an idea, not an organization, bro.'
"Corruption" is just an idea too; that doesn't stop us from punishing those who advance its cause.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
3d ago
Man I always complete forget that the Zumwalt exists
Yeah, it's a stealth ship, that's how it works.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
3d ago
But that gets too close to the truth of the matter: illegals are an invading army, and they were actively aided in their invasion of the US by the people in power at the time, English Civil War-style. (Which is why the domestics responded, correctly, by voting for the guy who promised to send his army after them.)
That the foreign soldiers should be treated differently than the domestic soldiers (Blue's other pet demographics, as they carry out the violence they wish they were doing to those with something to lose) would just be too much, because it would open the door to using it on other useful-to-Blue demographics (or "racism" for short). It's also not something you can really turn against Reform as easily, because Establishment benefits disproportionately from the ability to make the process the punishment- that's not something you could do if you have the right to a speedy trial a more efficient tribunal system, and certainty of being punished for bad laws speed-camera-style generally results in an stronger impulse from the population to reform them.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
4d ago
and they should have a plan to protect children just in case
Why? Those children serve as the hair trigger for the tripwire force (they've learned well from Hamas), and you don't even have to arm them for them to be effective in that role. Aggressively putting them in danger like that is kind of the point.
At least if they do get killed you don't have to wait very long for their replacements- it takes 14-16 years for a militarily-effective male to grow, but little girls can play the part of "cry for the cameras while being on fire" in as few as 5 or 6. Lightning fast by comparison. (Dead babies aren't quite as photogenic.)
you might end up with a legitimate secessionist movement
It's kind of already here. It doesn't have as much support in the cities (NDP voters [progressives] are 95-5 against, UCP voters [traditionalist-liberals] are 60-40 for, UCP is majority party) but it's clear to every Westerner (and Easterner, for that matter) under 40 that they'll never be permitted to win an election in this country- outside of one 4-year period they never have.
It's treated as absurd, as if QC has the exclusive right to agitate so
QC is different because they don't actually need to hold the executive to get what they want.
AB, by contrast, has to hold the executive; if it doesn't the Easterners just team up to block everything. Older AB residents are probably made happier by the Carney regime's recent overtures about more development... but those aren't really his policies, and even the CPC voted for those bills. I don't think it's as reliable a signal of "well they're going to vote LPC at the first opportunity", this is the bare minimum that the LPC believes has to happen for the country not to splinter.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
5d ago
every single conservative leader is prima facie suspicious
This is because, from the only politically relevant perspective in Canada (Easterners), they are foreigners.
I can't really overstate that enough. Western Canada is a foreign country to them, and that means their political parties are foreign too- CPC and NDP both. The NDP collapsed because it was indistinguishable from the LPC (and is why its only seats are out in the West).
You never vote for a foreigner in a crisis, Trump is the Worst Thing Ever to the Eastern Boomers, QED.
This isn't that complicated, unless you're of the opinion that Canada is a political monolith (which polls tend to do, for reasons that at least rhyme with manufacturing consensus).
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
5d ago
Why should anyone bother voting Conservative if it just means tax cuts and infinity immigrants?
That's why they lost the last 2 elections. This is why PP continues to have that mandate, by the way- at least he's saying Reform things this time rather than "but we should bend over backwards for whatever Karen of Toronto wants". You can't win that way, you see.
The NDP was the other counterbalance for reform, but they're arch-Conservatives now, which is why they're so indistinguishable from the LPC that most of their MPs are LPC now.
we may see Canada simply become a one-party two-bit petrostate.
If the petrostate part of the petrostate isn't smart [or powerful] enough to prevent that, and content with losing elections for ever, then it will be so.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
6d ago
it will create a decade-plus backlog of appeals in a system that is already not fit for purpose.
Nonsense, this is the system working as intended. Who's going to hold it to account? Clearly, voting doesn't matter- whatever party rep you selected is just going to go LPC anyway becuase fuck you, that's why.
What's even more insane is that legacy Canadian media appears to be supporting this push for his deportation to be waived.
Media system working exactly as it's intended to.
the Liberals have managed to somewhat skillfully defuse immigration as the bomb around their neck
Immigration was never a bomb around the LPC's neck, though: it helps exclusively their voters, and that's the only Canadian that matters.
See, LPC voters care about two things, and two things only: the price of their house, and flapping their jowls at the US (and any liberal reforms in that direction; the LPC is a Conservative party, not a classically liberal one). Carney is objectively the best candidate for those things, and that's clearly good enough for a dictatorship.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
6d ago
but the sheer number of them in such a short span of time, let alone to form a majority government, is entirely novel.
Yes, the government just straight up refusing to respect the results of the election is extremely novel for Canada.
Question is, of course, if anyone's going to care about that; or if the people that do care the most (i.e. people who don't live in Ottawa) are simply going to decide to quit. Sure, oil prices being higher helps those people in particular, but who knows if that's going to last.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
7d ago
Which means the Internet is the final frontier (in both the 'infinite probability space' and 'the last one that exists' sense), and to a point is still beyond the reach of the Karen. (Which, of course, is why the states proposing this are who they are.)
The thing that people tend to miss is that it is vital to the health of any society that Karen must be oppressed, because she deserves to be. But then again, that's just the mission statement of/justification for [classic] liberalism.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
7d ago
My eight year old neice doesn't have a smartphone, but kids at her school do and have shown her videos of ISIS beheadings.
Ah, older siblings. Where would we be without them? (A better place, perhaps?) Perhaps more interesting is the apparent fact they're able to correctly spell 'beheading', given their typical performance on the more pedestrian spelling tests and the lack of auto-complete.
Kids have been grossing each other out and watching absurd nonsense since forever. Porn is kind of like that [for them] too, for that matter, though I get that women (and their simps) complain about normalizing the concept that women have sex, occasionally on camera- which is naturally/by instinct what they're trying to stamp out. Of course, these women will then turn around and assert that a 7 year old boy willing to play with the dollies is trans and needs immediate medical treatment.
I'm less concerned about teenagers and more concerned about very small children.
I believe you are incapable of telling the difference between the two. That property affects young adults (and by extension, older adults) more negatively than it does small children, for obvious reasons, but it's fun to do that to them so people see that as a value-add. It's neutral at worst; it's not like they vote.
The free for all status quo simply allows those norms to be set by tech companies, rather than by parents.
Or rather, currently the norms are set by reality, not parents. Naturally, parents are very angry and Stressed(tm) out about this.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
10d ago
yet decline to call this sexism
It's only sexism if it's against women.
It remains a gynosupremacist statement, however; X-supremacy was what "X-ism"s were invented to prosecute.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
13d ago
I think his arguments were retarded, but really his biggest flaw is that he was unwilling to talk about literally any other topic
And this is different than the GP's "natural order is man > woman, anything else is Satan"... how, exactly? (Though I get that JuliusBranson, whose alt that was, was/is just kind of like that- and to be fair mangoodwomanbad generally isn't used as a self top-level post, or when it is, it's not quite that naked.)
The trick about arguing against discrimination against children this way is that it's kind of like arguing against discrimination against those poor in worth more generally- and it might be justified simply on those grounds- it's simply what's in the water and thinking about it too much means you're only in it for the miscegenation, so to speak. (Actually, I guess tomboys also count as miscegenation under those rules.)
Sure, but feminism and communism (the two most common ideologies of this type) can take a very long time to break that society, especially if that society is lucky enough.
We do have one example of how fast things fall apart, of course; South Africa's trajectory is a pretty clear object lesson on that.
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
13d ago
Sure, but Iran is made up of Iranians, who do want this; giving up on this means the end of your regime and the installation of someone who does still want this.
Palestine has the same thing going on.
There's really only the one solution to it.
Cro Magnon rules?
That's what "instinct" means, yes. Is it perfectly adapted at all times, particularly in modern post-scarcity environments? Well...
A human society that normalized homicidal competition for sex would not long survive.
Human societies normalize this all the time; it's just usually directed towards the tribe over the hill there. It's also not necessarily this way,
The problem with the S550 is that for the price you quoted you're only getting a V6
300HP is arguably more than enough for this use case; the S550 doesn't look as nice in my opinion, but is still the better car over the 197 (especially the 197s with the 4.0, which really is just a Miata with 4 seats and more room). I guess the Camaro counts too but the interior isn't as nice.
And then the Corvette, which is... also just a Miata in terms of practicality, but one on which the LS swap was done from the factory.
Not that both don't have the same kind of stigma, since the Ford has My Little Boomer on the front and the Corvette defines the archetype. That being said, though...
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
14d ago
I like Miatas, but if you're only going to have one car and want something sporty, there are better options out there.
True; the only actual car Ford sells these days is just "better Miata" for a really good reason. Also (mostly) true for GM, for that matter.
Bonus points for being cheaper on the used market than the average NA or NB; why pay 15 grand for 150 HP when the S197/S550 Mustang or C5/C6 Corvette exists for the same price? Not like those are any more expensive to keep running...
ThisIsSin
Tomboy miscegenation
14d ago
Ways that deconstruct it are not natively compatible with [human] biology.
You are supposed to get laid or die trying, you are supposed to kill other men and take their wives if there are not enough of them for you.
It's not supposed to be tolerable; organisms that can tolerate it are either malfunctioning or engaging adaptive responses to hopeless situations, generally through a quasi-hibernation process, typically called "depression" when it misidentifies successful conditions as hopeless. This summarizes the self-replicating feature of the organic process called 'life'.
Fortunately for modern civilization, we've done a pretty good job of killing all reason to desire things and provided reasonable simulations, to the point that most people don't notice and as such conditions are generally stable.
The baseline reality of a sexually dimorphic species is quite literally just this. I've talked about this before, and you know that.
We can pretty it up with a bunch of things- something about "inherent dignity" or whatever (which can be valid, if you can command enough violence to enforce it)- but at the end of the day this is the condition.
Robbery is the main crime, but rape also generally involves a bunch of other more interesting types of robbery (assault and unlawful confinement being the usual two, but there are others). Those things also come with significant costs that push the cost of that action far beyond the 300-600 dollars a naive assessment would suggest.
More options
Context Copy link