@Throwaway05's banner p

Throwaway05


				

				

				
3 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 January 02 15:05:53 UTC

				

User ID: 2034

Throwaway05


				
				
				

				
3 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 January 02 15:05:53 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2034

In brief - Cluster-B personality disorders are ones in which basic human defense mechanism (immature ones) run roughshod over function. People may effectively end up acting permanently as a teenager. Everyone has these defense mechanism however, and sufficiently bad circumstances can bring them out. And not everyone who has the disorder acts like a total crazy bitch. Plenty of politicians are functional narcissists, anti-socials work in Wall Street. If you know where to look you'll see more, or if your bubble gets stressed in some way you'll see more.

Ideally these people do well enough that most of the people around don't know that involved a ton of therapy or whatever to get there.

Modern woke feminism etc provides a good scaffolding for these peoples worst impulses to explode everywhere and cause a horrendous mess and for it to be called a good thing - which may explain certain over representations.

Furthermore, if you don't want to live in a HCOL then being a doctor is an amazing deal.

In the US this is not true, doctors get paid less in HCOL areas (not universally because California is a bit different). Want to live in NY? Boston? Chicago? Take a 25-35% pay cut.

Pay is pretty flat - once you are an attending that's the salary, if anything it goes down with seniority because more senior people will take on less optional work/call and will take on non-clinical duties that pay less because clinical work is brutal.

Exception is if you go into private practice which is dying in the U.S.

Usually pay differences are more by specialty, some just don't pay well, but also you have working in academia (pay is ass) or working in a big city (pay is ass).

Opposite of most of life, in medicine more prestige and higher cost of living = lower salary.

Ah, correction noted!

Yeah medicare and medicaid can often pay below cost, sometimes to a ridiculous extent. I think I saw someone saying California Medicaid was paying under 40 an hour at one point on Meddit - with costs like front desk staff and MAs that is just grossly unsustainable.

I strongly require a citation for this.

According to the Google the top 1% of of income earners in the U.S. make between 650-800 per year. According to the most recent salary data I've seen exactly zero specalities have an average salary in that range. Neurosurgery is not shown on this data and probably reaches 1% thresholds, however.

The bulk specialties (what most doctors are) all have average salaries which are less than half of the 1% threshold except for EM which is a tad over half of that threshold.

Of course, the real retaliation for Soleimani was likely Iran greenlighting the Oct 7 attacks.

So your argument for Israel being the aggressor is that the US and Israel killed the king of terrorists and assassins via assassination? And that this action makes the abduction, rape, torture and murder of over 1000 civilians a legitimate act of warfare and retaliation?

That is certainly a choice.

Any argument that Israel is the aggressor has to deal with 10/7 and the arm of the Iranian military that functionally exists to murder Israeli civilians (the proxies).

Has Israel perhaps done something directly prior to these missile attacks?

Yes yes Iran has always been at war with Israel since the formation of the modern Iranian state, you can always point to some earlier insult in the back and forth. Structurally I think arming, funding, and directing terrorist groups with the primary goal of destroying Israel is a good place to stop with respect to determining initial cause of conflict - but fine, they've always been at war.

hot war

You don't get to decide when someone has enough of you punching them in the face and decides to punch back.

But I do have different standards. First, the US and Israel are clearly the aggressors here.

Iran has been launching missiles at Israel, engaged in near constant terrorism against Israel, and is engaged in a variety of forms of cyberwarfare with the US and Israel.

You can trace back decades in an attempt to figure out who started it "first" but a fight has been going on for a long time.

Iran just mad because they've been punching people in the face without ramifications and Israel and the US said "one more time and I'm going to shoot you in the knee" and then they did.

They are not the aggressors.

Anybody have a recommendation for a coffee maker you can load in advance and set to brew at a predetermined time?

In all honesty I'm not sure if this criticism is being aimed at me or pro-Iran posters who are confusing me.

If it's aimed at me - it does seem that seem people are formally anti-intervention (which makes sense) or anti-jew (which makes no sense to me but it is hate and hate doesn't always make sense), some of the other posters I cannot establish a theory of mind for, like the people who are mad at the US for being authoritarian and want to support Iran in response (or move to China as a hegemon).

If the US had military intelligence so great that they could avoid blunders, GWB would have invaded neither Iraq or Afghanistan.

This ignores (at least in the case of Afghanistan) the necessity of invasion.

Which is likely what happened here. To me it seems likely if not obvious that some of the governmental claims are correct in a way that makes invasion necessary and appropriate.

Many people disagree. That's fine.

What bothers me is the posters who don't seem to have any idea what the claims and circumstances are, either out of genuine ignorance or for need of rhetorical flourish. This is the first time in years I've felt mainstream media reporting is more reliable and informative than this forum and it's gross.

Alienating his base and attacking his own supporters, and then starting a insane war for what seems like no particularly good reason.

Comments like this confuse me.

It's not like Trump is some unknown man in a smoky room, he talks all the time. His administration has stated the reasons why. You can believe them or not but they are out there. You can even go beyond the public statements and make some inferences.

If you don't know what the stated reasons are.....try and address that first? It's not hard.

Furthermore it's pretty much impossible to know if the stated reasons are true/accurate or not without access to classified intelligence.

It's entirely possible that 100/100 presidents would have done this. It's entirely possible that 1/100 would have done this.