TitaniumButterfly
No bio...
User ID: 2854
This assumes that laws of physics are universal and immutable which we are not in a position to judge.
By the way you would probably get a lot out of Stepheson's The Diamond Age if you haven't read it.
Looking forward to it!
To be honest I don't know what your actual objection is.
Yeah it's near the end of the first book.
And even if that's the nominal explanation, there's no way in hell it would work IRL.
I'm sure you know better than transcendent superintelligences =P
I'm pretty sure that's explicitly stated. It's a cradle of sorts to make sure that new sapiences can arise without getting eaten by the sort of (to us) megapredators which would otherwise infest the levels at which things like us are generated.
Well that didn't take as long as I thought it would. Not as satisfying without more buildup but today is still a good day.
Don't worry I've read plenty of Vinge. Was looking for more of a Vingian take on Avatar.
Yes I've read both and loved them. The latter held up better on a second read, imo, whereas I couldn't get back into the first.
- Prev
- Next
Now you're just making the opposite mistake, which is assuming that the laws of physics are entirely mutable.
This doesn't make any sense from any angle. There's no way to evaluate the values of a superintelligence. Also, there's no reason to assume they wouldn't have plenty of time/ability to stop such a thing from happening, nor foreknowledge that it would be impossible for a competitor to spring up fully formed.
The implication in the book is that galaxies are nurseries where the (distant) equivalent of new child deities arise, and they care to allow that to continue.
More options
Context Copy link