birb_cromble
No bio...
User ID: 3236
If LLMs/AI are posed to completely disrupt all the knowledge work, why do we not see it in stocks?
IBM's stock is absolutely shitting the bed at the moment, and roughly corresponds with anthropic claiming they can handle cobol now.
Here's a request. It's not identical to some of the stuff I do at work, but it's close enough that I'd like to see how it goes on 4.6 vs 4.5 and a cheaper plan.
https://github.com/petrandreev/jBPM3
I'd like to see this modernized. You can stick to only the core project for simplicity. That includes, but is not limited to:
- Migrating to Jakarta
- Upgrading to hibernate 7
- Replacing the now-unsupported xml mappings with annotations
- Compiling against java 17, and producing Java 17 bytecode
- Upgrading to JUnit 6
- Finding replacements for dependencies that are completely dead and rewriting the points where they interface with the code.
If you can get all the tests to pass and post the jar + dependencies somewhere, I can run a local test of the output.
Several top level posts have boiled down to posters thinking that the free model one can demo on the LLM's developers website, represents the best that developer is able offer.
But the OP says:
Yes yes, I haven't used every model and every scaffold (some of the systems he discusses are not publicly available at any price).
There is also a quote about the use of frontier models.
This is the second time this week where you have not engaged with the the actual content and delivered this "free models" swipe. What's going on here?
- Prev
- Next

Honestly this might be part of it. You can't really immerse yourself in Latin without a time machine, but you can get by pretty well if you spend a long time banging on the grammar, which is exactly how we teach most languages today
More options
Context Copy link