celluloid_dream
No bio...
User ID: 758

from "how and why to be ladylike (for women with autism)":
when you’re sexually attractive to a man you’re talking to, it hijacks some of his attention, and it’s not easy for him to wrest it back. ... the thing is he won’t really mind when he feels like you might be having sex, but if it ever becomes clear that that’s definitely not happening, then frequently the tool he will use to wrest some of his hijacked attention back from you, is feeling negative feelings about you. another aspect is that he might feel that he could never hijack attention in the same way, that he could look good but what you are doing to him is something he’s incapable of–so the easiest, most available go-to negative is resentment, which is very poisonous. people don’t like feeling manipulated unreciprocally without payoff.
and that is very similar to the dynamic I see going on with Aella and the ex-rat diaspora here, and other places. I see a burning, seething resentment far in excess of what she's actually said or done. For this particular stunt, I think Amadan is probably right and it's at least half an act, but nevertheless, I think people should try and cool their emotions about her. - just chill? Live and let live.
As someone on twitter said: (can't be bothered to go find it) "Aella is what first-principles thinking actually looks like". That's what is so great about her. If that lead her to heroic quantities of LSD, a high body count, and an unorthodox bathing schedule.. well, so be it. She has honest to god genuine curiosity. Yes, often wrapped in attention-bait trolling, but curiosity nonetheless. I don't follow her, but I'm always pleased when some article or tweet of hers comes down the feed challenging a taboo that no one else will touch. Agree with her or not, one Aella is more valuable than a thousand haters shouting "boo! whore!"
Yes, absolutely, and I do, but a lot of drivers aren't paying as much attention.
When driving, I'm more frustrated by pedestrians than cyclists. Pedestrians cheat busy downtown intersections constantly, and this exacerbates congestion. The streets in my city are designed for timed flow patterns, and would work wonderfully if everyone would just respect the "stop crossing" signal. Pedestrians know they can get away with it (count on it, even) because it's the driver's responsibility not to hit them. Fine, I'd rather people not die, but this is pretty selfish. They also pay very little attention. The number of times I've been turning right into an alley with a pedestrian not looking up from their phone is too damn high. "I could have KILLED you! - you could have DIED! Don't you want to know about that? at least see it coming? At least shoulder-check!"
When cycling, again, pedestrians most of the time because despite having the clearest field of view and moving the slowest, they're paying the least attention. They are liable to step into my path without looking, then jump back like they've seen a bear and scowl like it's my fault.
When walking, cyclists and drivers in equal measure. It's not that they're doing anything wrong - it's that I don't want to have to be paying attention to them. I just want to have a chill walk and think about something other than road safety.
An inspiring video, but it's still hard to square the fact that a US-made stick of metal and plastic sells for fully 1/6 the price of a Nintendo Switch 2. The grill scrubber looks like solid product, but if I put 6 of them together, I don't think I'd have even close to the value of a new portable game console.
I get that that is an apples-to-oranges comparison, and maybe I don't have a good baseline appreciation for the cost of strong metal things compared to complex electronics. I've paid almost as much as the scrubber for a glorified chunk of construction material before, but I was not happy about it.
It's just that if I saw that on the shelf next to the $15 wire scrubbers, I'd assume it was motorized. If that's what it's going to take to bring back manufacturing to the US, I question whether the general public is willing to pay for it.
To get those numbers, I assume housing supply is rising, but is still artificially held back in order to keep it as a viable-but-not-good investment?
That sounds a little crazy to me. If you could fix the problem faster, surely you should.
Maybe. I also stay away from the Marvel stuff, but from the description, it least sounds like it's not nothing.
Yelena is sort of protective of Bob, in a big sister way
... but it's more like a found family type of thing.
that's something!
At the end, after he saves the world together with his best friend
... basically best friends who occasionally kiss
also something
But I haven't seen the movies, so maybe you're right and it's a wasted opportunity.
Problem? What problem? From my perspective, the shift in screenwriting priorities is actually nice. There are so many varieties of non-romantic relationships that go underexplored on screen because the writers have to make space for an obligatory romance arc. Maybe the pendulum has swung too far of late, but human desires being what they are, I'm sure it'll swing back.
Also, counterexample: Have you seen the GTA 6 trailer from a few weeks ago? My first thought was: after hundreds of thousands of words spilled about the fertility crisis, dating troubles, incels, etc, the thing that is actually going to move the cultural needle is a video game franchise modelling a healthy adult relationship between its protagonists.
Yes. Classic WoW has a lot of dynamics to it that keep people playing against their will, sort of. In some real sense, your guild has invested in you, and your character, by taking you along, giving you loot and such, so you feel like you owe them your participation, so that your friends can get their rewards too, and your group can keep progressing.
Probably better for Bubbles long term, but it was shitty the way it went down that night. She probably cried. Like getting dumped by your long term friend group and finding out half of them never liked you and were talking about you behind your back
Yeah, Blossom was a unicorn. It's pretty rare to find someone with that combination of personality and skill. She lived somewhere exotic IIRC, like Hawaii or Alaska or something, so her internet wasn't amazing, and Classic WoW was one of the few games that was forgiving enough of network latency.
I cut Buttercup some slack because she had a tough job IRL (nurse, I think), and playing a healer in game is suffering, as you desperately try and keep people alive through their own mistakes, gradually failing at it. And yeah, maybe some insecurity
This incident was probably the inflection point in my enthusiasm for Classic. I stuck it out a while longer out of loyalty to the group, and we eventually cleared Lich King 25 heroic, widely considered the point at which you have beat the game, then quit. It was that, and other similar incidents, that made me realize the juice wasn't worth the squeeze. The game mechanics naturally led to that sort of conflict, and it just didn't have to be that way. I didn't have to play that kind of game. Would be better if I didn't. Is better now that I don't.
I have an anecdote to relate sort of in response.
Our group of 25 raiders in a semi-serious Classic WoW guild had been together over a year (maybe 2?), through TBC into WotLK. In that time, we'd been raiding 4-8h a week, every week through progressively harder challenges, building up a lot of camaraderie. There were 3 women on the team. Let's call them:
- Blossom (main tank - paladin, age: late 20s?, personality: everyone's friend, skill:absolute gamer)
- Buttercup (healer - priest, age: early 20s, personality: cranky af, skill: totally average)
- Bubbles (dps - mage, age: late 30s?, personality: extremely reserved, skill: bad)
end of a long session of raiding already an hour past the usual quitting time. Yogg-Saron, zero light (hard mode). It's near 11PM PST, pushing 2AM for the east coasters, on a work night.
Our group has nearly got it down, but the fight is difficult and takes a long time for each attempt - probably 10 minutes or something, + ~5m to get run back and get ready after each try. There's an easy mechanic at the start where there's a big floating AoE that everyone is supposed to avoid, and screwing it up means the attempt is almost guaranteed to fail. People are tired and making mistakes, especially Bubbles, but not exclusively her. The raid leader makes a call: next person to screw up that mechanic gets benched for the night. This is harsh, but understandable. No one vocally disagrees, at any rate.
Of course, Bubbles is the next one to screw up. True to his word, the raid lead kicks Bubbles from the group (she's still listening in discord), and apologizes but explains it's just for tonight. Get some sleep, etc. Buttercup twists the knife with some sharp comments "fucking FINALLY", "should have done that 45 minutes ago". Blossom sticks up for Bubbles. "yo, chill" "just a game", "let's calm down", etc. Buttercup more than happy to double down and fight : "bro she's literally keyboard turning, shut the fuck up".
Somewhere in the middle of Buttercup and Blossom going at each other, Bubbles leaves the channel, leaves the guild. leaves discord, and doesn't play again.
Having wasted far too much time playing Classic on and off since 2019, the ratio there is probably closer to 20% total, and 10% of serious raiders. Fairly confident in that estimate based on experience in raiding guilds and hearing everyone's voices in discord.
Dictionary? Translation? I guess, but in the current year, if you're not running every page through Claude to see what you missed, what are you doing?
Did you notice that I described Carney that way in my post? That's also what I said in my introduction of the video transcript to the LLM (not included with the pastebin), so the fault is mine, though I don't even admit it's false. Two months is a short enough time to be PM that I think most people would still describe him as "new", especially since the time was almost entirely spent campaigning.
I agree! No one is writing a bland and direct summary. That's a problem! I have such a hard time getting that anywhere. Journalists invariably give too much "important context", while excising things they deem "not important", and that's largely where the bias creeps in.
Worth noting that the article you linked is much longer (I specifically asked for short), and includes additional Q&A not included with the video I gave it. I'm confident if I could find the full video + Q&A, and altered my prompt to ask it to give context on important recent events, and gave it a word count, it would deliver something equal to the Guardian piece there.
Just try and give me a single example of LLM output that's remotely comparable to quality human work.
I just fed it a video transcript of a recent press conference by the new Canadian PM, and got this article.
I'm not going to get into percentiles, but I would say it's fine - comparable to human work for an easy quotes-and-summary article, and free of annoying media clickbait traps like making half the article about Trump.
BC is split between "Left Coast" and "Western Canada", with the former having a higher population, but the latter covering more area.
Honestly, yes.
I also live in Vancouver, and while parts are bad, they're not that bad compared to what I've seen in other cities. Overall, I feel safe except for perhaps a few blocks in a few areas. That's not to downplay the deleterious effects of shambling fent zombies, A&W pikemen, and other baddies from the medieval monster manual, but in my opinion, the disorder is usually more of the theft/streetshitting/nuisance variety.
Anyway, here's a fine specimen of a methhead light skirmisher attempting to fell an Amazon truck (not pictured) with an improvised javelin.
knot tying
That is a great app. I just bought it, and I'll use it a lot, but I still want to complain about this class of thing in general. That is, monetizing publicly available info for mobile formats. If I didn't have a stash of Googlebux about to expire, I'd have passed on principle.
On a PC, if you wanted to look up how to tie an Alpine Butterfly, you'd quickly search it on Google or Perplexity. If some site was selling a tutorial for $5 you'd automatically move on to the next available free one, because we don't live in an age where the Mountaineering Guild gatekeeps access to the secret knowledge of rope folding, and it's near trivial to put up a site with the instructions for free. It bothers me a bit that developers get away with selling the same thing as a mobile app simply because of the added annoyance of trying to do it with a small screen + thumbs.
Yes, the presentation here is excellent. The UI is near-perfect, but also, I bet I could have Claude vibe-code me one with little effort.
I can't speak for Toronto. Maybe the demands of harsh winters, or the lack of natural beauty limit what can be done with modern styles which often draw much of their appeal from space and the surrounding environment, so architects instead try pure weirdness and that puts people off.
I can say, though, in Vancouver, modernism works very well.
- a house
- Museum of Anthropology at UBC
- The Law Courts building and surrounding Robson Square
Meanwhile, I find the nearby Vancouver Art Gallery to be a dated relic of an ancient time, and neither inviting, nor pleasant to be around, or inside.
But that's just my opinion
Yeah, I think that's accurate, and why I find the default personality to be more important now than ever. I can have any of them do the thing, but which one is going to format it nicely, explain at the verbosity level I prefer, match my informal tone without being cringe, etc. etc?
Speaking of taste, lately 4o has very much been passing the vibe check, and 3.7 Sonnet very much hasn't been.
I'm now using Claude almost exclusively as a workhorse and ChatGPT as more of a conversation partner, when it used to be the other way around. 4.5 is even better
Denali is a pretty good name. Right number of syllables, pronounceable, memorable, and been around long enough now that it's stuck. Mount McKinley is fine and all, but there are already so many mountains named after people with European last names due to.. well, history. There's nothing wrong with that, but if we've managed to have a few that are more unique, I'd rather they remain.
Fort Bragg -> Fort Liberty -> Fort Bragg : Approve. Fort Liberty sounds like a dumb action movie screenwriter's half-assed working title for their generic military base. Bragg is better, and it hasn't been Liberty long enough to warrant keeping that.
Gulf of America: Oppose because it's new, but I will grudgingly accept that it is a large enough geographic feature to deserve it. Gulf of North America, maybe? Also pretty generic.
I'm astonished you were astonished, and I'm curious just what rock you've been living under to be unaware that the average person would see that as a very odd life choice these days, and probably indicative of other trad religious leanings they might disapprove of.
I'm a great fan of "meaning" names - especially ones evoking natural beauty (Brooke, Cliff, Dawn, River..), months/seasons (April, May, June* Summer, Autumn..), animals (Bear, Fox, Raven..). I feel they have a certain metaphorical upside. They're ripe for wordplay, poetic double-entendre, etc.
You're safe to pick from a huge number of respectable options, but on the other hand, someone has to blaze trail and name their son Marmot first. It's going to weird the first time. Everyone hears it, rolls their eyes, doesn't like it. Then someone "does it well", owns the name, normalizes it and gives license for future use.
*June is kind of a double reference, if you think about it
Does anyone have insight into the business model of food delivery apps? (Doordash, UberEats, Deliveroo, etc.)
Right now, I can order restaurant food delivered at half price with a coupon deal, maybe 60% after the driver's tip. In order to qualify for the deals, I must have it delivered, so if I want half price food from the Thai place on my block, I have to go through one of the apps and get some international student (always an international student) to go in and pick it up, then ride his (always his) scooter ~100m around the block and hand it to me.
I would prefer to pick it up myself, but this invariably voids the deal, and it doubles in price.
Who is paying for this absurdity?
- It can't be the restaurant. Restaurant margins are notoriously thin, and if they could be doing a pad see ew at $7, not $15, I'm sure the normal price would be lower. I can't get the deal direct through the restaurant either. Has to go through the app.
- It can't be the delivery person. Even if they're getting paid literally nothing but tips, I'm still saving money on the food. Also, my area has a minimum wage law, which means they must be getting at least that much when they're on the clock.
- Must be the app companies, right? I'm eating VC capital for dinner every night, and it's cheaper than cooking for myself. But how is this at all sustainable? The restaurants and delivery drivers use all the apps, so they're not capturing market share. They're just burning money. Are they stupid?
- Prev
- Next
If a driver has slowed to a crawl (walking pace or less) for a stop sign, they have done 99% of the work toward preventing an accident. Assuming they would fully stop if anything else is nearby, then to me, it doesn't matter if they roll the stop sign slowly on a clear intersection.
If you feel differently, I'm curious why
More options
Context Copy link