cjet79
Anarcho Capitalist on moral grounds
Libertarian Minarchist on economic grounds
User ID: 124
cjet79
3d ago
1st section: haha, take that nimbys 2nd section: ugh dont want to read 3rd section: a continuation? gonna skip 4th section: oh god canada has gone crazy.
actually maybe 4th section just sums it up in general
cjet79
3d ago
Your post confuses me. Which happens a lot in the bubbles of the internet. I don't really know what is going on cuz I barely follow anything closely enough.
My understanding is that this lawsuit was in part about the IRS targeting politically conservative groups. Which they were shown to have been doing back in the obama administration.
Why the stuff about cop beaters? I suppose that is in reference to people attacking cops during the Jan 6th thing. But I wasn't aware of many organizations that claim credit for that surviving until the modern day. I admit to not knowing the status of the proud boys. Though the FBI and CIA are still around and their funding is not linked to this, so that also doesn't make sense to me.
I think there is a very difficult political problem being pointed at here. Trump's involvement just muddies it all.
Government controlled by Party A has done things to wrong Party B. The judiciary is supposed to be an independent entity that steps in and arbitrates these disputes.
What exactly is supposed to happen if Party B does not realize they have been intentionally wronged until they control the government?
If they sue the government its just Party B suing the government they control. Of course they win. That is what happened in this case.
Options:
A. Nothing happens. B. Punish rule breakers. C. Reward victims.
I am heavily in favor of option B, but no one in power is in favor of that option. The people in power in party A that carried out the harm have a set of preferences like A > C > B. The people in party B that have been wronged have a set of preferences that generally looks like C > B > A.
Rewarding the victims is a good compromise option. Because the people that suffer are taxpayers, and who gives a shit about taxpayers? Republican politicians is apparently a fair answer for any who opposed this payout. Had the roles been reversed would democrats have done the same? I'm sure we will find out. (if we haven't already from some buried issue or court case that has been ignored for a few decades)
cjet79
4d ago
Back in 2013 I got the chance to meet Peter thiel at a students for liberty conference. He was fielding questions from students at the bar.
I basically asked him where he'd move or where he thinks the next good "liberty" place is. He insisted the USA was the best.
A decade is both a short and long time. Plenty of time for an individual to change their mind or their views to shift. But not very long for a country to go into the shitter. And not very long to verify that a newly successful country is going to stay successful. People seem to forget that Soviet Union had a few decades of apparent success. A single leader can make for a few great years, maybe even a decades worth of great years. But the systems, institutions, and culture of a country are slow to change on such timescales.
I think in this case the US has gotten worse, and Argentina has gotten better, but what has changed the most is not the US or Argentina, but Peter Thiel. It's the boring answer, but still the correct one.
cjet79
5d ago
Felt righteous at the time I wrote my post, but felt like a fool soon afterwards when the original story turned out to be kinda fake. Though I think the quoted bit is still true. At least it held up to some verification. Would like to know if it is false as well. Because I should know better than to trust feelings of righteous Indignation.
Good to know faith in political system increased
More options
Context Copy link