coffee_enjoyer
☕️
No bio...
User ID: 541
facing federal charges for hate crime vandalism and death threats against Jews
She vandalized a military production facility during a period where 85% of children were going hungry due to a food blockade against civilians:
85 per cent of children did not eat for a whole day at least once in the three days before the survey was conducted.
7% of children had moderate or severe malnutrition:
A separate study of 1200 children in Gaza between February 2024 and June 2024 estimated that 6.7% and 9.6% of children below age 5 years had severe and MAM, respectively, also with higher estimates among children in North Gaza
The baseline rate for this in Gaza is 1-1.5%, though this is probably because of the blockades etc they suffered from before the war. In the US the baseline rate is 0.1%.
The communities expand, and when they take electoral control by becoming kingmakers in New Jersey politics, they will expand with little resistance. And they will probably decide to steal more money, like they’re doing with the federal security grant program. Or maybe they will force Rutgers to bend over backwards a la lawfare:
For the proposed listening sessions, the agreement names Rutgers Hillel and the school’s Jewish law student association — the same one pro-Palestinian students accused of doxing them — as relevant “affinity groups” to the campus Jewish community. Rutgers currently participates in Hillel-led antisemitism training seminars; the school also previously announced an internal antisemitism task force, but unlike other universities it has yet to release a report. In December 2023, the school became one of a long list of universities to suspend its chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine; it reupped the group’s suspension in August.
I imagine they will try to expand New Jersey’s K-12 holocaust education, to maximize the demoralization of the goyim and the special social privileges for Jews. Children already have to read books like this as part of New Jersey’s mandatory holocaust indoctrination:
Browse these literature recommendations to help young white children see racism and bigotry and understand how to take a stand against it: THE LEGEND OF FREEDOM HILL ($15.95) tells the story of two young friends in 1850s California -- Rosabel, an African American, and Sophie, who is Jewish. When Rosabel's mother, Miz Violet, is captured by a slave catcher, the two young girls put their heads together to win back her freedom. The lively text and colorful illustrations enliven this moving tale of friendship and bravery. (Grades K-4)
Why shouldn’t your child read “White Antiracist Biographies” starting in Kindergaarten?
In the part few years the Jews in New Jersey have already expanded the program and ADL and Gottheimer are looking to add even more guilt-based propaganda for your children to read before they can count.
My state already has sharia law, with clerics ruling over everything from sideburns to showing your hair. The extremists are 5% of births and doubling every twenty years; they are projected to be 80% of births by 2300, but they are so adept at politicking that they will have functional control over the state within 40 years. These extremists have so much influence that one of them born in my state has vetoed the president’s choice of cabinet for not settling matters in their sharia courts. This sharia extremist was a key voice in causing America to enter a disastrous war with no way out. The sharia courts rule that women are forbidden to divorce without their husband’s permission and forbidden to sing in public where men might hear. Artistic representations are largely forbidden, as is any socializing with non-extremists. They have so much power already that when they get caught engaging in large-scale welfare fraud, the state merely offers an amnesty program so that the cleric’s favorites don’t get jail time. I’ve seen them take over my own relative’s school board where they cut all funding for extracurricular programs because they only attend their own extremist schools. The sharia extremists engage in a variety of schemes to fund their operation. Feel free to swing by New Jersey and check out our sharia towns if you ever get the chance.
When they get rid of the Palestinians they will simply move on to the Lebanese, the Syrians, the Egyptians, then the Iraqis and the Arabs in the north of Saudi Arabia. These are the imagined borders of the ancient territory of Eretz Yisrael and Rabbis have their own form of “accelerationism”. Your great-grandchildren are going to be hearing about how God always promised swathes of Iraq to the chosen people. They will also still be hearing about the holocaust.
Medicare at least helps Americans. America fighting Israel’s war only helps Israel afford their own universal healthcare plan. We are effectively spending our own taxes and dying so that Israelis 6,700 miles away enjoy free healthcare. It would be inappropriate for Americans not to hate this arrangement. This is essentially what the emotion of hatred is for, the neutralization of worthless costs to us:
hatred produces behaviors functionally designed to neutralize targets costly to the hater
I mean, it is instrumentally useful to hate either Israel or our arrangement with Israel so that we can stop (transitively) funding their healthcare system and instead fund our own healthcare system, if that’s what voters want us to do. (I don’t really know how I feel about healthcare spending personally, though).
The ad is pretty good. I don’t think normal people want to pay $2,000 per household to improve the lives of Jews 6,700 miles away, just twenty years after we spent $3,000,000,000,000 and 4,400 lives doing the same in Iraq. (Well, rather, half the cause of the Iraq war was Jewish lobbying, so $1.5 trillion and 2,200 American lives is the the tab owed by Jewish lobbyists). Haley Stevens’ husband is Jewish and she herself is considering converting to Judaism, and it seems that they’ve chosen to align their loyalty to the Jewish Nation and not America. This isn’t exactly unexpected.
RIP Patrick Stewart
I’m not following your argument. If you believe that the sociopathic have some invaluable skill, why would you want them tending to the very stupid anyway? Seems menial. And who is an example of someone you think is a sociopath who has done a lot of good which his non-sociopathic peers could not have accomplished?
If you have two different Centers for Kids Who Can't Read Good and Who Wanna Learn to Do Other Stuff Good Too, one run by a sociopath and one run by a relatively reasonable person with sincere love for the pupils, what superseding benefit should we expect from the former? I would expect to see a lot of waste which benefits the owner’s pockets or reputation. Because the sociopathic ultimately cares about his power, success, status, reputation. (I mean it’s a spectrum, everyone loves this stuff, but there are people on either pole). He’ll probably do a lot of worthless assemblies and meetings where he gets to feel powerful, maybe he’ll send flyers to make the town sad about how little they care for the stupid in a bid to bring in private donations, maybe he’ll overstate how much money the school needs so he can pull a bigger salary, maybe he’ll do a whole redesign of the school that doesn’t matter simply because it makes him feel cooler. Or maybe there’s some “test” that gives him a national ranking so he ignores the holistic needs of the pupils to focus on min-maxxing that one metric, so he can be boastful among his peers. What am I missing here?
Why would you think the moral requirements for an idiot and a savant are the same? (Are you a communist?) The system includes both of them, but the moral requirements are not
Do you mean their moral desert claims? Well, a community should increase the wellbeing of its members, as this is the noblest goal worth pursuing, with everything else being vanity. This aspiration makes sense to me: if I can 80/20 my happiness, the rest of my energy should be spent on my neighbor. I mean, not that I do this, but that this is the most noble and desirable governing principle for a community: abounding in joy. My conscience and reason tells me this would be the best.
It takes just as much effort for them to do the right thing as it takes the sociopath to do the more right thing.
Do you mean in terms of raw economic productivity? But that’s not an end unto itself. The 60iq should be trained to fulfill the duties appropriate for his iq, and he should be trained in how to pursue a happy life likewise. That might mean putting him in front of media where he will develop a phobia of gambling, alcohol, or drugs. Maybe it means that his financial decisions are double-checked by someone, or a benevolent ai. Maybe his schooling should literally just consist of an RPG in Roblox where he does mastery practice for the kind of tasks he would find in his future employment.
Some people are better than others and thus deserve more than you do
This is not something I believe. Ideally, each person would have the same amount of wellbeing (high), sacrificing his own for another in need; if anyone is to receive an overabundance in wellbeing, it should be for the instrumental purpose of eventually increasing wellbeing in the longrun, like mothers (to raise healthy children), the very innovative (to produce more innovation), perhaps young couples (to produce more children), soldiers, harsh laborers, that kind of thing. I want the 60iq to have the same wellbeing as the 140iq, in the basic needs sense. As far as we are Abel. Why not?
But if you let the sociopathic guide the low IQ, he will probably find some self-gratifying avenue by which he can benefit himself. Maybe he opens up a school that doesn’t do anything cost except his pockets and reputation. Maybe his charisma introduces false hopes. Maybe he completely ignores their needs and just maxxes the political donation -> kickback pipeline. Seems to be infinite ways for him to ignore the Important Thing to act selfishly. The evolutionarily-aligned cognition for helping someone is just compassion / pity, but this of course can also go awry if you are inculcated with modern values, hence the need for training, like how a doctor is trained to perform triage.
Maybe there is some niche where they are most useful, like in a “hype man” role or working on a project where the output metrics are impossible to fudge.
experience?
Thinking in light of the Cyropedia, the Spartans, savant training generally, and how Krishnamurti was raised by the Theosophical society. I don’t see why we couldn’t train up savants in this way as we do with chess players, piano players, mathematicians, etc. In the same way that politics selects for the Ruthless Ramaswamys of the world, willing to capitalize on a woman’s rape and conspire with his mother to steal money from Alzheimer’s research, we would maximize in the opposite way, selecting for the most ruthful.
The best rule would be to follow the command of the closest relative who has their life together. Nobody else is more likely to have a pure motivation in advising someone. I’m skeptical of a less intelligent person’s ability to understand the correct instantiations of “work hard” and “be kind to people”. This leaves them open to being manipulated. I like the idea of selfless shepherds leading a flock of the lowest IQ with pure compassion, but there’s no institution right now that has a track record of doing so reliably. If we can find a way to select for people like that, though, it would be nice. In my dream system we would select the relatively high IQ who cry easily when you show them sad videos or play them sad music, and then you throw them into a twenty-year-long program where they spend all day reasoning and arguing and being emotionally-indoctrinated into Christlikeness, give them a salary for their whole life so that there’s no competing motivations, and then just listen to whatever they say. That’s probably the best bet: IQ, temperament, extreme training since childhood in pragmatic thinking, propaganda / inculcation (to make them love saying what is right even if crucified for it). Can’t imagine a better selection process than that unless we want to throw in lie detectors / EEG.
I think Tristan Harris or Lee Kuan Yew are good contemporary examples of the kinds of guys you’d want to select for in terms of temperament, whereas you’d want to do everything humanly possible to deselect the dangerously charismatic Elizabeth Holmes types. Probably easier to weed out the somewhat more sociopathic in childhood before they learn how to adeptly lie.
- Prev
- Next

Looking at his published works…
Birth Outcomes Among Arab Americans in Michigan Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001
Ethnic Inequalities in Mortality: The Case of Arab-Americans
Arab American Health in a Racially Charged U.S.
Understanding Differences Within Ethnic Group Designation: Comparing Risk Factors and Health Indicators Between Iranian and Arab Americans in Northern California
Yeah, he is clearly obsessed with his Arab identity (or Arab-ized Egyptian identity). Perhaps this is the result of seeing the clear superiority of Secular Christian America compared to “Arabized” Muslim Egypt, the cognitive dissonance of living in a better country while being raised by parents who are fiercely pro-Muslim and pro-Arab idealists. The glory days of both Egypt and the Muslim world are long behind them, and Abdul would have no way to process this information humbly if he was raised in a Muslim Brotherhood environment. And Islam itself offers no way to deal with this mismatch with grace.
More options
Context Copy link