BANNED USER: personal attacks
>Unban in 6d 01h 10m
crushedoranges
Russia and Ukraine are two butch lesbians fighting over a condom
No bio...
User ID: 111
Banned by: @Amadan
Children are generally not very interesting before the age of ten. Maybe it's my Extreme Male Brain, but women can take care of em before then.
If a kid wants to hang out with me, it's okay, but I'm not going to actively engage. I supposed if I ever had a wife, I could be coerced into kid minding duty, but there's a small slice of time where they're smart enough to be worth teaching and 'mature' enough to not want to hang out with their stupid dad. That time is worth maximizing. The rest? Eh.
2nd amendment, contrapositive: no foreigner is allowed the right to bear arms.
I have no idea what's going on either. I was thinking about commenting but everyone was talking past each other and alluding to things that I had no context of.
Next time someone tries to call you an Israeli agent, ask them if they want a free pager. Making a joke about it disarms the glowie alarm in our heads.
As it is the case for many weak monarchs, Maduro may have been the compromise between rivalrous factions who - although ambitious in their own right - don't have the will or the prowess to step into Chavez's shoes. The bumbling fool could play president on TV while the real power brokers run the country.
But what happens when your puppet ruler is kidnapped by a foreign hegemon?
Fictions are durable. If you've been pretending for years he's actually in charge, then people believe that. You can't go 'we're the actual rulers' overnight. And suppose you actually do that. Trump could send Maduro back! Then what happens?
So as long as America has Maduro in hand, Venezuela cannot appoint his replacement without great internal effort. There'd have to be an election. I have no doubt that his vice president is a Kamala and was picked because she would never even sniff power. Any deep state figure wanting to control the Chavista party will do so without a scrap of democratic legitimacy.
I see your username, and I immediately read your posts in the tone of that peasant in the Holy Grail who is complaining about being oppressed.
Using my elite noticing powers, I notice that flouncers with dramatic names begging the mods to ban them rarely, if ever, have anything interesting to say. Maybe the contents of your mind are simply uninteresting, or worse: boring. Why don't you know, make a good post, instead of preemptively winding up your victim complex?
If every bar you go to is full of assholes, maybe you're the common denominator.
It has nothing to do what Israeli politicians say or do and more of the fact that the Holocaust made the Jewish national existence the responsibility of every household. If they don't fuck in Israel, then they'll be demographically drowned out by the Arabs. That's why you get weird things like the IDF sperm squad which extracts sperm from dead soldiers to impregnate their widows, like some demented and sad version of 40k's apothecaries. If you're not spermjacking the dead to increase the birth rate, you're not pro-natal enough.
It's frustrating that the problems created by feminine autonomy are dogmatically treated by the West as a masculine problem. Because when men were cruising around, not committing to relationships and having casual sex, in traditional societies they were called 'cads' and 'equivocators'. Women weren't cajoled to 'woman up' to the standards of lechers and playboys. Men have already lowered their standards in the modern dating market. Women aren't expected to cook, to clean, to pay for anything, or even be pleasant. And women STILL EXPECT MORE from their mates then they did in yesteryear!
And now the girlbosses aren't getting married, because Plain Jane doesn't want to settle for Plain John and is unhappily seeking her spot in Mr. Chad's harem. How is this men's fault? Why would Chad commit when he's got a buffet of easy sex to pick from every weekend? And even if we could tame the Chad, there's only so many Chads to go around. What's the average guy who isn't a werewolf surgeon billionaire supposed to do? Yes, neckbeards have unrealistic standards. But what, exactly, does a woman have to bring to the table to be seen as a desirable mate? Can you name any? Or is this just another feminist cope that excuses women of all agency and responsibility?
The bottom 80% of the male population isn't getting 80% of the female attention. They're getting ~5% of it. That's female freedom in action: to pursue the best men. And because of how heterosexual attraction works, only the truly hideous women with no redeeming qualities at all will know how it feels to be an average man. To pretend that there is equality in this is obvious liberalslop. Women are never lonely - never truly lonely - until they pass the age of forty, then they experience the bleak reality of equality. Only then do they understand!
Men know. Young men know. Every male knows about a simp in their immediate friendgroup who goes the extra mile for a woman who won't give him the time of day. Women complaining about noncommitment from Chad is an obese welfare queen complaining about starvation to a Ethiopian. The average man that sits around and waits around for a suitor to approach him like an average woman does will die of old age before he gets approached. The average man - to state it plainly - does not attract the average woman at all, nowadays. All he is a free dinner and entertainment, the human version of watching TV filler when nothing better is on.
Dance, jester! Dance faster!
Somalians can and do rob from each other in their home country. The difference is that in the West there's enough to steal that pilfering from their kin is no longer worth their time.
The video's author could personally come to my dwelling and fart loudly in my face, cheeks spread wide open and splattering me with the fecal remnants of his last shit and his observation would still be valid: the daycares that don't admit new children and conspiciously don't have any sounds of children (they are not quiet, let me tell you) are frauds and you should be ashamed that you are even defending this position.
Anyone who goes 'he's right, but he didn't say it in GOOD FAITH' should be shot by a firing squad.
Admittedly I am only skimming on what Asianometry presented on Youtube about Asian tech but his assessment is that big names mean very little in the EUV space. Lithography and chip fabbing are incredibly complex industries that are beyond the ability of a singular genius to sway. You need a team of geniuses in a vertically integrated industry with solid government backing and private investment to get anywhere.
Even China can't outbid the entire world for RAM and CUDA cores. Selling to themselves in a closed market forgoes a lot of profit on the international market and will only make prices go even higher. A lot of capital is being sunk into this next frontier of Great Power competition and the West has a great deal of control of the technologies that make it possible.
Of course, my anime waifu that exists only to flatter me.
If Britain and Argentina are two bald men fighting over a comb, then Russia and Ukraine are two butch lesbians fighting over a condom.
If you're objecting to the word 'slave', then it can easily be euphemized as a superior/inferior axis. The meaning does not change.
Wokeness is the emanation of the brown/LGBT/feminist ressentiment against the spectre of 'white supremacy', which has expanded from mere racism to the entirety of what we would consider to be western civilization. Jealous iconoclasm and seething historical revisionism aside, is this not a collection of inferior moralities, of 'oppressions', trying to find a common superior morality to abhor?
You may disagree with Nietzsche, you may even disagree with people who use his concepts rhetorically, but it is absolutely not a boolight. It is being used in its intended purpose.
A hell of a lot of capital is being thrown into the AI space, so much so that it is disrupting the consumer computing market (much to my great annoyance and probably every PC gamer everywhere.) All of that growth into building datacenters and creating AI is a bubble: whether it will stabilize into consistent and regular growth like the Internet did or crash and burn remains to be seen.
No, I'm not going to engage on your terms, because I have basic pattern-recognition ability. If I bring up an example, you're going to make up excuses on how your Jewposting isn't Jewposting and you having a Really Good Point that no one else seems to recognize.
I know a redditor gotcha when I see one. Your infinite capacity to waste other people's time and never admit fault does not make you any more correct.
You're unironically behaving like the Jews from Mein Kampf that Hitler so despised, who would be refuted of their nonsense day after day and return without a trace of shame repeating the same lies.
You know what you did, you clever Hebrew you.
And there's no point, because reducto ad iudaeus. If the root cause is the Jews, then debating the various means of how the Jews are at fault is both limited and uninteresting. (You allege they act through the WEF, I allege they act through the WTO: is there really a material difference to our positions?) And if they're not the root cause, and you refuse to accept that possibility, then what, exactly, are we debating?
I can't prove a null hypothesis. I can't prove that Jews aren't behind everything and there is no evidence that that possibly could. You may think yourself in an unassailable position but what you are really doing is being a bore that only talks about the Jews. There is no point debating you because you refuse to change your mind in the face of evidence to the contrary - or your standard of proof is so unrealistically high that nothing will convince you otherwise.
So, for emphasis: what is there possibly to debate, when all of your propositions end with the same conclusion? Don't try and squirm out of this, you reprehensible degenerate. Having the same answer to every question is not a superpower. 'The Jews Did It' is your only position of any substance, and I'm calling you out.
That's not a fact that can be debated on its terms: it's a strongly held belief on your part. And I can't reason you out of a belief or debate you into changing it. So sack up and do your big post on How The Jews Did It in the main thread: show us your revisionist history so the whole community can tear it apart.
If you can't, or don't want to, then shut the fuck up.
If you feel that you're the prophet in the wilderness in this, then you are obviously not here to debate, but to preach: and are self-evidentially an unserious person. There's really no good reason to seriously consider anything you have to say because you have a monomaniacal zeal on this one topic that you will never give ground on.
Yes, yes. Finally the recognition I deserve.
If I wanted to talk to an AI, I'd have it emulate the persona of a big-titted anime bimbo who aims to flatter and please me, and not the median poster of the Motte. QED.
Your protest rings hollow because you can seemingly not talk about any subject without bringing them up!
I challenge you to go a month - even a week! - without connecting the subject at hand to the perfidy and scheming of the Hebrew race. And this is a challenge that I believe you will fail because my Noticing powers didn't just stop at FBI statistics.
Give me some credit. Don't treat me like I'm stupid. I don't understand why you have to keep up a pretense when you obviously have an agenda. Heck, I even agree with you sometimes. But you're the Jew guy. You talk about Jews. That's what you're known for. You're the Semitic Outrage Poster. The Israel News Hour. The Rabbi Amber Alert. You have 1400 posts in your history that are strong evidence that this is the case.
If you're going to try and evade this, even after that, against repeated interaction and very public history of such behaviour, that is probably the most Jewish thing anyone has ever done on the Motte.
You having to resort to prompt generation to not Jewpost is not the defense you imagine it is.
Although that may be true, there is a nonzero (read: 99.9999%) chance that you are a obnoxious bore.
I've been censured for waging the culture war myself, but I'd like to flatter myself and think I do so in a creative way. You going "DAE, anyone think that the left are useless mouth parasites" is lazy redditism and is cringe and even though I AGREE WITH YOU I still think that your contribution is worthless.
This isn't a Facebook boomer thread. Have some class.
If you are earnestly a righty and on my partisan side: stop it. You're making us look stupid and you are convincing no one.
What I do suspect, however, is that you are trolling, and are in fact a lefty posting ostensibly righty positions and trying to get a gotcha of hypocrisy. No one is fooled. You could put what you have posted so far in a partisan mirror and nothing about its content or valence would substantially change. How do I know? Uh, righties don't use the term 'fascist' or 'brainworm' like you do, and your references to an objective truth are absent of any reference to God.
Either case does not reflect well on you.
The mythical man month applies to human reproduction, in that nine men and one women can only make a single baby a year, no matter how hard the men work in vigorously impregnating her. If you think that men are the sex that is the bottleneck of babymaking then you are very silly. What are we supposed to do? Wait for the girlbosses to deign to save the human race? Why aren't they doing it already?
- Prev
- Next

"Heh, I compare two incidents that have superficially similar argumentations around one another and so once again I accuse the chuds of hypocrisy, gotcha!"
Go directly to Reddit. Do not pass go, do not collect 200$. There is a world apart between making rhetorically weak arguments and fabricating evidence whole cloth. You know this. But here you are, saying something incredibly foolish, to attempt to reignite a past argument that you had failed to persuade in.
You are shameless, that much I know, but you can try to at least not be stupid at the same time. Now, having bitten into this bait, I will spit it out and go on my way.
More options
Context Copy link