@dailydogma's banner p

dailydogma

r-rawr...

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2026 March 15 02:45:58 UTC 

				
User ID: 4231


				
				
				

			

		

	














	


		


			



	

		

			

			

				

					

						

							
						

						

							
							

								
dailydogma


								

								

								
								
								

								
							
					
 
				


				
r-rawr...

				
				
				

				

					0 followers  

					follows 0 users  

					joined 2026 March 15 02:45:58 UTC
				


				
					

					
No bio...

				

				

				

				

				

					

					

					
					
					

					
User ID: 4231


					
					
					
				

			


					

						
					



		

	

 











			
			

			
			

			




	


		

			
‎

			

				
				

					Hour
					Day
					Week
					Month
					Year
					
				

			


			
‎

			

	
	

	 Hot Bump Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
	



		

	






	

		
		

		
		
	

	

  







		

			
			
				Friday Fun Thread for October 2, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Chill, the words won't hurt you, I promise.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


I'm sure this was after curfew and she was probably out of uniform when she arrived, too.




Who/whom here? Who does this benefit? What is the point of it? I think the only bad thing that happened here, conditioned on the existing sexual marketplace, is that this girl decided to lie. The sex itself was fine. Sex is not magic. It's not magically wrong. I would prefer a sexual marketplace where there is easier access to loving monogamy as it is far more enjoyable than a sausagefest gangbang but the problem is generally not enough sex is happening, so I can't fault people for doing it in a different way. It's like a famine, and these people found some bread. Is steak better? Yes. But let them eat bread.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I am not saying that only stupid girls are horny. Just that this one was not that bright. Not because she had sex but because of her dumb statements as well as her apparent failure to understand what she was doing.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


But the DA (several attorneys in the office) failed to, even assuming it completely true, find all the required elements of the purported crimes. Assuming the summary is accurate, this seems a really big own goal. Why submit such a thing at all? It was voluntary.




Reading around I heard this girl also said stuff like «back in the medieval this was normal» to the boys whiles doing stuff. So she's clearly at Cornell on something other than academic merit.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


No, I think this is just another example of the toxoplasma of rage where the most dubious rape cases are the ones that go viral.




I don't think dubious stories are more likely to go viral. Rather, the difference between this story and most rape convictions is one of class. High class rape stories go viral. Most rape convictions are low class, rather mundane. But precisely because true high class rape is exceedingly rare, most stories people latch onto are dubious. Dubiousness is a self-own and I think this story will ultimately backfire on the people who really want it to be true.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I couldn't find Surf in the Safari Zone to save my life as a small child.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Cornell 7, Law, Truth, Sex, and Morality


I would like to compare and contrast two sources on the Cornell Seven case. The first is https://cornellseven.com/ which is the top search result one gets when searching the term. The other is «District Attorney statement re: Jane Doe v. Cornell University, et al.»


The first source begins with




In October 2024, a 20-year-old Cornell student went to the Chi Phi fraternity house to meet someone she considered a friend. According to her lawsuit, what followed was hours of drugging and sexual assault.




The second source largely agrees:




On September 18, 2026, I learned of the civil complaint filed in New York County Court alleging a series of heinous and despicable acts committed by members of the Chi Phi fraternity at Cornell University against a fellow Cornell student on October 19, 2024. The lawsuit, which has been published and widely discussed online, sets forth allegations of multiple sexual assaults committed by male fraternity members against a woman who is referred to as Jane Doe. Given the lawsuit’s graphic allegations of criminal conduct, the question of why those individuals were not criminally prosecuted has been raised. Over the past two weeks, many people have called my office, left voicemails, and sent emails about this case. Some people have understandably sought answers. Others have simply insulted and sometimes threatened my office and my staff. In each case, the comments and questions have been based solely on the allegations in the civil lawsuit and its characterization by news and social media sources.




Unfortunately, this is where the sources diverge. The more popular, but less informative source continues:




The complaint alleges that members of Chi Phi coerced her into taking ketamine, supplied her with marijuana and high-proof alcohol, and sexually assaulted her while she was incapable of consenting. It alleges that one fraternity member then sent a message advertising “free pussy” upstairs to the fraternity’s group chat, after which additional men entered the room. She says she tried to cover herself and push one of them away.




The more informative source disagreeing:




Jane Doe’s sworn statement in November of 2024 did not allege that she was drugged against her will or gang raped. On the contrary, Jane Doe’s statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual.




The police's summary of Jane Doe's statements is where this comes from:




Male Number 2 “asked [Jane Doe] if she wanted to do more Ketamine.” At that, Jane Doe remembered “that [she] had taken Ketamine at some point on the couch with [Male Number 1 and Male Number 2] during this night” but she could not remember “where or when that took place.”






Jane Doe thought that she “had already done Ketamine once so why not do it a second time.” “At that point, [Male Number 2] poured a line of Ketamine on his erect penis, implying for [her] to snort the line. [Jane Doe] snorted the line of Ketamine, which was a heavy amount of Ketamine.”




The popular source says:




The lawsuit further alleges that all seven men named on this site were present while ketamine was poured and snorted from her body, and that she was made to consume additional ketamine as the assaults continued. According to the complaint, the ordeal lasted until approximately 5:45 a.m.




But her statements say:




The males began complimenting Jane Doe and “talking about how pretty [she] was.” Male Number 4 “asked [Jane Doe] if they all could do drugs off of [her] perfect body.” Jane Doe responded, “Sure.” While the men were doing drugs off of her body, “[Male Number 3] and [another male] entered the room and said something like, ‘Ok we’re shutting down whatever the f*** this is.” Jane Doe felt dizzy due to a pre-existing medical condition causing dizziness combined with the effects of the Ketamine use. Male 5 or 6 (who apparently have the same first name) “encouraged [her] to stay seated as long as [she] needed.”






Eventually, “[Male Number 1] and [Male Number 4 ] ushered [Jane Doe] out of the room brought [her] upstairs to a small room.” Male Number 1 stated, “Let’s do more Ketamine.” Jane Doe “remembered snorting more Ketamine” and “remembered feeling extremely high.”




About being forced to go to 5:45 AM:




Male Number 1 “said he wanted to have sex again because he wanted redemption for passing out earlier in the night.” Jane Doe initially stated that she was tired and asked Male Number 1, “What happened to just you and me?” Jane Doe could not remember how it started but she then engaged in a threesome with Male Number 1 and Male Number 4 involving oral sex and vaginal sex. She described her level of intoxication as “8 out of 10” at this point. “The threesome continued until at some point, around 5:45am, [Jane Doe] said [she] was tired and needed to turn in. At that point, both guys stopped the threesome with [her] as far as [she] can remember.”






It would seem that the legal system has so far behaved reasonably well. No criminal charges have been filed, and the lawsuit was opened two weeks ago. Hopefully she will get no money, but now everyone will know about her. That would be justice in this case.


I think the demand for stories of male rapists outstrips the supply. A lot of people want the Cornell 7 to be rapists, but they aren't. In fact, they come off as rather meek to me. Something about sharing one girl between 7 men like they did just seems that way to me.


And that's where I see what I think this case says about the dating market and the relationship between young men and women in 2026. The demand for horny women also outstrips the supply, to the point that handsome, wealthy, intelligence, social Ivy League frat bros need to, in a rather fruity manner, have sausage fest 3-or-more-somes, instead of each of them getting girlfriends independently.


The actual root of this case, ironically, is that men are so respectful of what women say they want, that they now let a huge chunk of women sit out romance and sex entirely, producing extremely sexually deprived young males willing to to share a one night stand with 3 of their male friends. They respect her consent every step of the way and still wound up with a frivolous false allegation because their behavior sounds more rapey on the surface than a one on one.


One element at play here as well is that under the law, only non-consent is illegal,  but maybe many people think this behavior was immoral nonetheless. But I don't agree. On what rational basis can that be justified? The only downsides to sex that I see are the risk of pregnancy, STDs, and unwanted pairbonding effects. The former two are well under control in modernity. The latter is largely controlled by the legal consent framework, although strangely the people who buy in to that framework the most tend to justify it on far weaker grounds than this. Hopefully this case will go down as a pretty big hoax like the Mattress Girl.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Selection will change the actual traits median people have though. I think people should be smarter and maybe more loyal.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Wellness Wednesday for September 30, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


sometimes people would ask me what I do these days and I would freeze and mumble 'I trade equities and crypto', and I can feel the judgement coming because it usually either means that I'm an unemployed loser or one of those course peddling scammers.




I mean, in my world model there's no secret trick to this. As in it doesn't work, it's either sitting on money, luck, or is not happening. So you must be a trust fund baby, early retiree due to winning bitcoin lottery, or you are lying/exaggerating. The former two are somewhat attractive to low quality gold diggers and that's about it. If there is a skill I can use my IQ to develop to retail trade crypto and equities for good profit please teach me and I'll gladly update my world model.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
How about the reason is good and not actionable? It should be, if he indeed never has a chance with her.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


But by the end of the second date she new it would go nowhere. He was always 'on', always projecting some image.




That's a vague and silly reason to «know» it won't work out. It's date 2 and she dumped him for putting effort into his comportment? Seriously? If he hadn't she'd have dumped him for having too poor of manners on date 2.




feels like he is smarter and more cultured than everyone else.




That shouldn't be a problem if she's also on that level. Maybe the IQ gap was too big, which is a normal deal breaker.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Friday Fun Thread for September 25, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Unbelievable effect sizes. Are you willing to make a bet with me that those won't hold if you correct for cross sectional confounders? Where you take the position that the positive effect will hold. Or are we just making performance here? Do we really believe that something that shreds DNA has such a ridiculous dose-response curve?


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Celts are bad actually. Not certain how it works among German speakers but the historical population pressures differ between Frisia and Austria in a way that presently favors Austrians imo.




all have the same genes that allow for some parts of woke but not to embrace the whole package, clearly.




No need to be smug about this. On what basis?


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Yes.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Small-Scale Question Sunday for September 27, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Cloudflare should ask you to solve a captcha once and gives you a cookie when you win that should work for a while. I never have issues even when behind VPNs that are definitely being used to do mass web scraping. It may just be your network speed if you don't have some kind of anti-cookie setting.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Small-Scale Question Sunday for September 27, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Or he's just behind CGNAT and someone else on that IP is scraping with it. If so he could switch services to someone who will give him dedicated or he could do something like buy a high reputation IP from digitalocean or nordvpn or wherever and configure his router to use that as a VPN. If his router can't establish VPN connections then he needs to buy a router that can ...


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
It's not Catholic doctrine it's just population genetics that correlate with historical catholicism for contingent reasons.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
The AI can download it, install it, configure it, mod it, and launch it with 1 request.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


and even a bit of friction in getting a game to run on my computer tends to leave me cold about trying it.




Doesn't AI fix this now?


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Yes and the Catholic/southern parts of Europe are noticeably better than the US or UK when it comes to women. The protestant Continent is in between. He should probably start learning Spanish and French.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


there's a significant body of sexually predatory men




Not me.




don't believe that sexual violence is actually harmful,




I don't believe most of what is prosecuted, at least in the news media, is sexual violence. Since it's not violence, it's not harmful.




who don't like the fact that shifting norms means their already-dodgy behavior has been clarified as predatory




I think it's homophobic to call this behavior dodgy. So what, they had voluntary sex with their bros and a girl? Why is that bad, are you against bisexual/gay men?


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Why don't we just arrest people who act like voluntary sex is actually bad? Aren't horny people far more victimized by such people? Like after centuries of state backed terror?


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					






The ability to control your impulses is a crucial element of participating in society.




So should failing the Marshmallow Test be illegal then?




If the desire and prospect of getting laid causes you to throw out discernment or consideration for other human beings, you are one of the people who make the police necessary. ... I think it would be a better world if we had fewer people who thought that being horny was some kind of excuse.




Afaik no harm came to the woman. From the evidence presented in the thread, she enjoyed the encounter and was there voluntarily. Real rape really sucks & should be illegal but a lot of these «rape» cases lately (as in since gamergate at least) have less  negative qualia in them than a bad day at school. Them being illegal implies that bad days at school need to be illegal as well (handcuffs out for asshole teachers, bullies?) as many other things we take for granted as a part of «being in society » like having a shitty boss or your spouse cheating on you or being dumped or rejected.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


I sort of reject this solution because it exports the problem to that country. where are THEIR males supposed to go?




They marry your women. Go look it up you can find plenty of that, if you can't you are probably shooting for too low of a country. Don't marry a fillipina or cambodian.




Yes, and the political gap between young men and women is the largest its ever been. The women have flown off into la la land and nobody is correcting this trajectory.




You should assort on genotype and not phenotype. If you nail the genotype converging in your relevant beliefs will be easy. The easiest way to target genotype is to simply target a percentile among women. You do the same thing for height if you want tall kids (I don't recommend assorting on height now as that's frivolous and the market is in ruins) and intelligence. I believe that the median female is 4 IQ points dumber than the median man (a lot of people run denialism on this point but idk their issue), on top of greater male variability, which means that if I wanted to marry an at least 130 IQ man I can actually marry a woman with an IQ of only 121 or so.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of September 28, 2026
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I agree with your point, but technically culling horny men will reduce the mean horniness in the population which will reduce the horniness of women and men at the same time. I'm pointing this out explicitly because I'm getting at how arresting men for small sexual torts is nothing other than a barbaric dysgenics project. The whole point is spitefully interfering with these young men's reproduction and if you use POSIWID you get that the point must be to reshape the human race to be less horny. Because they are being targeted merely for being horny.