facing a workload crisis on many fronts
See this is my other point, the Gov't COULD expand the Judiciary with more judges and staff and alleviate things, but AI is such tempting solution here.
And it genuinely becomes a question "if the AI is 90% as good as a judge at ruling correctly... why bother with the judge for less important matters?"
And at the county level, the judges can be very bad indeed.
Can I be more generally annoyed that outcomes for elites are uncorrelated with the impact their policies have on the rest of us which makes them unsuited for making good decisions that advance their constituents' interests?
I just want a filter that removes the bad actors and keeps them out of positions of power or influence. Seeing them enjoying rewards and acclaim after they inflict disastrous harm just reminds me that on a systemic level we simply don't hold our elites to a high enough standard/they have insufficient skin in the game.
- Prev
- Next

Well that's what I'm saying. If they used AI to shortcut through most of law school, they would still have to pass exams.
So its plausible someone who leaned heavily on AI wouldn't know enough to pass a bar exam.
But a little implausible they'd have gotten out of a T50 law school with their GPA intact.
More options
Context Copy link