My brother, thank you for the loving correction. I have no wish to quarrel about words, as St. Paul admonishes us against.
Oh, here we are. Famous Paul 2 Timothy 2:14. Because matters of Trinity and Christology are "petty arguments" and pure logomachia. I don't give a shit about fake piousness and tone policing.
If you asked me, "Hell is a place, yes or no?" I'd say, No. If you asked me "Is evil a substance, yes or no?" I would say no. You did not ask me, but complained that my devotional language is imprecise. If I had instead posted, "God is an apple tree among the trees of the forest" you would have likewise found fault with the theology, but it is the language of the Song of Songs.
You are living in your head, this conversation never happened.
If I said, "Jesus is present in the Holy Sacrament of the Altar," and in response someone said, "No, Jesus is God and God is everywhere," that would miss the point. Jesus is especially present in the Eucharist in a surprising way and it is worth commenting on.
Again, an invented conversation that never happened and completely disrespectful.
If I said, "Jesus's incarnation changed everything, God establishing a physical, material presence on Earth in the form and substance of a man is surprising. It elevates the dignity of man," and in response someone said, "God already was there, God is everywhere, why are you surprised?" that would miss the point.
Again, this conversation never happened. Why you have a need to invent whole paragraphs of false literally strawman conversations and fake arguments?
But instead I say, "Jesus' death changed everything, God dying is surprising, God traversed the one place you would least expect Him to," and this you find fault with. God be with you.
So finally, after all these fictional stories in your head we arrive at conclusion. No, Jesus did not travel into a Not-God place. As I argued before. Also, this low tier emotionalist theology and fake protestant tone policing does not work.
p
Oh, here we are. Famous Paul 2 Timothy 2:14. Because matters of Trinity and Christology are "petty arguments" and pure logomachia. I don't give a shit about fake piousness and tone policing.
You are living in your head, this conversation never happened.
Again, an invented conversation that never happened and completely disrespectful.
Again, this conversation never happened. Why you have a need to invent whole paragraphs of false literally strawman conversations and fake arguments?
So finally, after all these fictional stories in your head we arrive at conclusion. No, Jesus did not travel into a Not-God place. As I argued before. Also, this low tier emotionalist theology and fake protestant tone policing does not work.
Just state your argument.
More options
Context Copy link