@greyenlightenment's banner p

greyenlightenment

investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...

3 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 18:26:17 UTC

blog https://greyenlightenment.com/

Verified Email

				

User ID: 68

greyenlightenment

investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...

3 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 18:26:17 UTC

					
				

				

				

				

				

					

User ID: 68

Verified Email

I think people wrongly assume that because it uses crypto that it is more decentralized . this is not the case.

The bears may be right eventually, but the market may have gone up so much in the interim it will not matter. If the Nasdaq gains 20% year for the next 10 years , that is a 6x return I am leaving on the table waiting for something which may never happen in my lifetime.

this is such bullshit. Kalshi did the same thing about Khomeini's death. Because he died instead of vacating, the trades were voided even though his death had the same outcome. Markets "work" because there are rules that everyone agrees on ahead of time. When these rules are changed arbitrarily when money is at stake then people lose confidence in markets. Also, there is not even anything disrespectful about this. A betting market does not imply people do not want him to be found. It's possible to be pessimistic about an outcome in the short-term, while still hoping for an ultimately positive outcome. They may as well just put a huge disclaimer on their site "we reserve the right to void any market for any reason we deem fit"

This is the arbitrary moral posturing that makes people hate and distrust "big tech "companies. But this is where money is at stake. These prediction a markets are huge, with billions in funding. They can afford to take a stand. Caving to moralistic pressure will mean users losing trust in them.

The laws of physics are much more reliable than economic forecasts or the relation between debt vs. sustainability. Since 2008 there has been no shortage of smart-sounding people who make this type of prediction invoking charts and other data. It sounds persuasive, but it's of no actionable value. Sitting out of the market in the expectation of a crisis means loss of real wealth as inflation keeps growing at 2-5%/ year, and homes become more unaffordable. Ask people who waited to buy a home in 2010 fearing things would get worse or in 2020 during Covid.

seconded. create a blog or post on twitter predictions

The ability to become wealthier or at least improve one's financial salutation is one of the few things anyone has some control over, unlike talent or traits (e.g. HBD). Anyone can invest in the S&P 500 or not waste money on frivolous purchases.

If money were distributed on a „deserving“ basis, the correlation between wealth and age would be near-zero,

Wouldn't it be the opposite? People who have worked longer are deserving of more?

The thing is, tech stocks are actually quite cheap. META's PE ratio is under 19, for example. So it's not as if they have decoupled from fundamentals.

The problem with debt is that it can be meaningless for a long time and then it can matter a lot. Like the famous Lenin quote "There are decades when nothing happens and there are weeks when decades happen".

This can be true , but when people make this prediction every year and nothing happens, it comes off as crying wolf. This is much more applicable for smaller economies which do not have reserve currency status, which cannot inflate their debt as the US can.

At least I got one lol

brings back memories. 2017-2021 of the old sub

The US dollar, bond yields, and S&P 500 have held up well despite oil having gone up so much, suggesting market participants are not concerned.

https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/TVC-DXY/?timeframe=1M

People again have made this argument of the US losing the petrol dollar and it has not borne out

312 vs 226 was not exactly close even though the popular vote was closer. With so much at stake, the political process has become increasingly optimized . The GOP has learned from its mistake of running uncharismatic candidates as seen in the 90s and 2000s. And combined with an increasingly polarized country means closer elections.

In 2018, He had higher approval ratings, a thriving economy and no war....yet he got knocked down by a blue wave. With the way things are trending, it would take a great fumble for Dems to lose the house. Trump may also lose sufficient seats in Senate, so that 2028 could shape up to be a trifecta win for a Democrat.

The economy is doing well though. GDP strong, unemployment low, CPI lowish. Trumps 's approval rating is in the same 2pt range now as it was before the raw. There has been no massive loss of support as many predicted 4 weeks ago when it started. Trump has the same problem Biden had, and the same low approval ratings: he's too polarizing to win over the middle/undecideds. Like with Biden, there is nothing that can change this.

had trump been reelected in 2020, do you think the 2022 selloff would not have happened? I think it still would have happened.

so predictable, like free money at this point, hence TACO meme.

If a war does happen, it carries enormous risks one way or another, even with the extra budget. If a war does not happen, it is money largely wasted in that it could be spent better instead.

How would it be wasted when the alternative is social programs which may have a lower ROI? This presupposes that defunded social programs have an unusually high ROI, which I don't think it's possible to conclude this.

Not lower the debt at all, public or private; and in fact increase the debt massively. (This one didn't amount to much, there isn't much money to be made here until the US starts to go downhill for real, so it's just positioning for now.)

The US has seemingly defied every prediction of its debt being unsustainable. GDP keeps going up,so the debt is inflated away. Those who keep predicting collapse or other crisis keep being wrong.

I've recently made a bit of a small amount of a fuckton of money based on starting amounts; took my fuck around money and plowed it into you guessed it, oil futures and related industries before it became clear that no, he really is that stupid. I'm up a lot on top of my previous gains from betting (read: instructing my investment guy who tells me which southeast asian restaurants are for real) to bet as if the various Trump economic policies would:

The second trump term has been a huge boon for me investment-wise: correctly shorted Bitcoin, anticipating Trump would not follow-through on the widely anticipated or hoped BTC reserve.

Bought dips during Liberation-day selloffs ('TACO' meme)

Continued to trade various dips and rallies by selling various option spreads anticipating quick recoveries from selloffs and inflated implied volatility, and rangebound markets

The anticipated post-tariff inflation surge never came to be, so I profited by being invested in tech stocks and the overall economy doing well.

Also made $ on polymarket betting against Trump mentioning Bitcoin (these are called "mention markets") and against the Bitcoin reserve.

I think it's possible to make $ following whales on Polymarket/Kalshi who possibly have insider info, but haven't looked into it much. I noticed on the 28th, the eve of the attack on Iran, someone placed a $20k bet on the contract "strikes in the next 24 hours", an hour before it jumped off. The contract surged from 14 cents to 20 cents almost instant and the stayed at 20 cents for 40 minutes until finally going to $1.