@greyenlightenment's banner p

greyenlightenment

investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...

3 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 18:26:17 UTC

blog https://greyenlightenment.com/


				

User ID: 68

greyenlightenment

investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...

3 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 18:26:17 UTC

					
				

				

				

					

User ID: 68

It's not possible to make such a trade be profitable because betting on volatility increasing has a carry cost.

But going to cash is probably the best bet, but there is no upside either.

Suggestion: make cast votes visible to OP before 24 hours. So I can see my vote score but others cannot, until 24 hours, and then everything visible. Votes are useful information. If a post is getting too many downvotes, it may mean I am wrong about something or I need to assess my priors.

The new information is it increases the odds of him leaving. Indeed, the stock fell a lot in afterhours on the news.

I guess now we find out that he also compromised his own executive team? Who cares?

CEOs who deliver results and are not breaking the law should be allowed to do what they want, so no disagreement here. I think he doesn’t want to stay. He’s the opposite of Elon Musk: he’s not going to put up a fight here. He sees his legacy of turning Nvidia around from a gaming company to the leading semiconductor company. He can retire with that intact.

right, nuclear scientists were exempt in order to build the bomb. others were not.

Stalin was unusually pragmatic in this regard

i will just echo my comment 2 weeks ago about this https://www.themotte.org/post/4020/culture-war-roundup-for-the-week/491915?context=8#context

The consensus 6 months ago SPCX stock would crash--6 months later is still at around 133--its IPO price. I predict the same for Anthropic. It will hold its valuation far better than people are expecting.

Employees will be looking to cash out after IPO lockups expire.

This is priced in mostly. When the lockup ends, people on the sidelines swoop in to buy the shares, negating the selling.

People are terrible at forecasting this sort of stuff

if i had to guess, the biggest risk is loss of pricing power due to competition. They do not have as strong of a moat as Meta , Google or Microsoft.

Similar to how Stalin didn’t require the utmost fealty to the party from his smartest scientists, the US has always implicitly created exceptions for the most productive industries.

Many white collar jobs are already invented. This includes both millions of public and private sector jobs. Since the end of the Second World War and the development through the 20th century of manufacturing automation and the emergence of computing hundreds of millions of jobs have been artificially invented by a combination of regulation and direct and indirect government spending in sectors like education, healthcare, finance, law, actual public employment working for government and non-government (but funded directly and indirectly by it) and quasi-government organizations, old age care and more.

They were invented to handle a wealthier, more complex, and litigious society. i don't see AI changing any of that.

more likely welfare will be expanded

the loathed email job is never going away

UBI a la the "Freedom Dividend" idea from the ill-fated Yang campaign. VAT tax gets divided among everyone equally without means-testing.

This is probably among the least likely of the AI forecasts--even less so than the 20-30+ % unemployment rate figures touted by many people. It would be too expensive, for one.

White-collar labor becomes increasingly rare.

Disagree. If we see an AI boom, then this will lead to more jobs being created overall, if economic history is any precedent. A ton of white collar jobs involve dealing with the unique needs of clients , customers, or solving coordination, adversarial, or edge cases--areas where AI is weak or doesn't work. When an insurance company denies a claim, they will anticipate a notice from a lawyer. And it's war. This is not something Ai will just fix.

So the big story is Jensen Huang had an affair with now a second woman

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is facing a potential ouster by the company's board of directors following reports of a second extramarital affair with an internal executive, sending the chipmaker's stock plummeting over 8% in after-hours trading.

source: https://thehill.com/business/6214833-nvidia-ceo-jesen-huang-affair/

It’s like, what is wrong with this guy? I predict NVDA stock will recover, and this does not affect AI overall or the upcoming Anthropic listing. What began as a personal matter has now consumed the news cycle, but does not affect much outside of Nvidia, IMHO.

This ties in with the ambiguities of morality. I predict Mr. Huang will recover. He will remain in good standing with the public and the media despite this. Yet had he been revealed as using a sock puppet for posting "badthink" online, well, this would be much worse in the eyes of the public. Indeed, Patrick Stewart had 2 affairs and it amounted to a footnote in media coverage of his passing. All he has to do is just lay low and he will recover, unlike, say, Louis C.K., whose career was destroyed (obviously consent is an issue here, too, and an affair presumes consent, whereas for #MeToo this was a murkier area).

The second part is about the smuggling and espionage aspect, where the implications, if true, would be much worse, an actual criminal offense, than merely a consenting couple having sex (albeit involving the CEO of the largest publicly traded company in the world), yet the lax reaction by Washington is weird.

It's being treated with the same seriousness as smoking pot behind McDonald's--technically a crime in some jurisdictions, but whatever. Espionage and smuggling were always considered grave offenses (e.g. in the context of the Cold War or Prohibition) and now they are secondary, inconsequential to the affair. Morality is weird...what people take offense to, how mores change (like anti-racism being much more important than faithfulness). I think it's implicitly understood Nvidia is a huge success and central to the US tech boom. Actually doing something would have almost all downside.

I was saying to short bitcoin actually

yeah I am doing the same now more often. AI has gotten so much better now vs even as recently as 2025.

I have following and writing about consumer technology since 2007 and near 100% of these "so and so is a bubble" warnings/predictions never come true. When there is a correction it's because the entire market fell, like 2008 or 2020 in covid, not because the actual technology precipitated it. 2000 seems to be a big outlier in this case. It fit the textbook narrative: a bubble that brought down the market. In the past examples, like railroads, other factors were absent: companies were smaller, and less aggressive fiscal and monetary policy. The fed and Congress will step in, like in 2008 or 2020.

everything minus some epsilon?

They're largely obsessed with white people, but in the worst ways possible. They think white society is a hair's breadth away from putting them all in concentration camps. They all have white boyfriends, which presumably fill the same niche that orcs do in hentai, with their physical characteristics (especially their height) always being brought up.

in fairness this has a grain a truth. A U.S. president did something just like that

Reta is better

it's out of control . The war on drugs, which is when this began, morphed into a war on freedom.

Even for things I am competent at, i still succumb to the laziness aspect. This is why even mathematicians are using AI for papers, like on arxiv. these are experts, but they still outsource.

I would argue economic and educational diversity are bigger factors than ethnic or racial diversity . America was pretty diverse even before the wave of Hispanic and South-Asian immigration, but more cohesive; e.g. Chinese, African Americans, Eastern Europeans, Germans, Irish, etc. Nowadays, you got people who have high incomes and pay a premium to isolate and afford premium services. 70+ years ago, wages were much lower in real terms accords the board. There was no such thing as the $300+ k/year white collar/UMC job. Car culture part of it it by creating literal physical distances.

that is the whole openclaw thing

but we're not talking laws here. we're taking citizens calling cops or police being called for things that do not fall under crimes. so everyone is now paranoid

The problem is now websites are blocking agents' IPs, undoing the productivity gains.

Expectations have risen faster than outcomes- due more to TV than social media, because most of this predated social media.

IMHO it's not social media. If you follow random people on social media, the vast majority of people are not that successful. Most are actually struggling. I think it's more like "we" occupy a certain bubble, but the majority of Americas do not have nice tech jobs, high status careers, etc. Rich celebrities have always existed, but the category of "online micro-influencer" is a more insidious one because the barriers that Hollywood provides are gone. It seems more attainable and in your face.

Competition is always better for the consumer though. Social media censorship make this clear. There are still no good alternatives to Meta.