heavywaternettipot
Token Midwit
No bio...
User ID: 1819
That I chalked up to her inexperience. The main villain accessed way more variations (the luchador, the pinata, the pebble) demonstrating her superior mastery of the ability
I'm not sure that I'd go as far as excruciatingly boring, but I do think it was wildly overhyped. It had a novel premise (at least as far as my personal sci-fi exposure goes) but the execution wasn't as brilliant as everyone says it was. It's not bad but it's not the Second Coming of Christ either.
I did find the "sausage fingers" scenes extremely off-putting for whatever reason.
I gave up alcohol for Lent but I'm starting a batch of beer this weekend that should be ready the day after Easter.
From the Twitter thread you linked:
Unless you're claiming the ADL was behind these "few small groups" Knightsbridge mentioned, hoax is too strong a term here. Sounds to me like there was a credible-but-low-risk threat that the ADL reacted to for either political/financial reasons. It's also possible ADL blaring this as loud as possible deterred those few small groups from actually going through on their plans. It's one thing to hit a target that's not expecting you, it's quite another to hit a target with beefed-up security.
EDIT: Added a link to the specific tweet.
It's not clear to me that being around more kids moves the needle one way or another. As an anecdotal counterpoint, I have 11 nieces and nephews and it hasn't increased my inclination to have children at all.
Remind me on the next Wellness Wednesday.
I can probably afford the fallout. While this individual has clout, they can't blackball me from the entire industry. (From what I've read about them, they aren't really the kind of person to do so anyway.) Right now I'm thinking I take the initial interview and just lay my cards on the table at the beginning. Nothing ventured, nothing gained, I reckon.
The really infuriating part of this situation is the standing issue. Biden is (probably) acting illegally but if no one has standing to challenge his actions, then there's fuck-all anyone can do about it. This may be the straw that breaks the camels back for me and causes me to just sit and wait for the end.
I said I had 10 years of experience with a particular subject. I have anywhere between 7-9, depending on how strict your definition of experience is.
Last week I applied for a position I'm underqualified for via LinkedIn. I applied on a whim for two reasons:
-
EasyApply means it took all of 30 seconds to send in. Low barrier to entry + plus alcohol = wtf not?
-
Ten seconds on Google told me the company's primary business was well-afield of what they'd be hiring me for. I'm in a niche field that a lot of HR types don't really understand and make up wild job requirements for, i.e. 5 years of experience using a toolkit that was only invented 6 months ago. Because you have to get through the HR gremlins to deal with the people who actually do the technical interviews, I generally don't feel bad checking "yes" for non-cert requirements I don't have. Everyone's trying to buy a Bentley at Kia prices and we'll all settle on an upmarket Honda in the end.
Fast forward to this morning and I get the initial screening interview email. Turns out the company I applied to is a start-up with an almost identical name to the one that popped up on Google. Aforesaid start-up is also being run by someone with some actual pull/clout/influence/whatever in my field. And that individual is the one conducting the initial screening call. (I did a little more digging and called around to confirm this isn't a scam and it isn't.) I'm not sure how to feel about this.
Point: I got the interview through misrepresentation. This isn't an interview with an HR gremlin who's ticking boxes, this is a screening with someone who knows their shit and very likely knew exactly what they were looking for. Is it ethical for me to burn 30 minutes of this person's time?
Counterpoint: On the other hand, if this person is doing the interview, it's fair to think they have read my resume, right? Some of the easiest flags to screen for, namely years of experience, is pretty easy to derive just glancing over my resume. So if this person read my resume and is still wants to do a quick phone call, that must mean they must see something worth at least exploring, right?
Counter-Counterpoint: This start-up probably doesn't have any organic HR gremlins but that doesn't mean the CEO isn't using some other HR gremlins to screen everything. There's a good chance the CEO just aid "Find me X" and the out-sourced HR gremlins said "Post the template for X on LinkedIn."
Counter-Counter-Counterpoint: This person probably going to interview dozens of candidates for this position. 30 minutes of his time really isn't that much in the grand scheme of things.
There really isn't a point to any of this, I'm just posting this here to keep from spinning out too badly.
Just so you know, people – normal people, sometimes even smart ones – like this stuff. Avengers, Avatar, Harry Potter, Star Wars (even today's wannabe gopnik wears a Marvel T-shirt instead of Abibas, and buys his chick a counterfeit Baby Yoda for 8th of March). Videogames, movies, cartoons. More importantly, they know that everyone else likes or at least knows it, so it occupies the same niche as the Bible did for commoners in previous generations, or «the Western canon» did for intellectuals, or myths did for the ancients: it's a common inventory of archetypes and references.
Crichton made mention of this in Sphere, which was published in 1987. The myths of Superman and The Wizard of Oz long ago replaced classical myth.
Not an actual suit normally. Usually slacks, dress shirt and a sport coat, so suit-adjacent.
I get compliments from men and women.
I'm far from a fashion plate but I typically wear a fedora or trilby to the office. I wouldn't say they're making a comeback but I do get complements from people on the subway often enough.
Being forced to compete in an artificial capitalist economy is unfair when you are biologically less suited than others to that competition, but well-suited to your natural environment that is displaced by the capitalists.
Africans are biologically less suitable to capitalism than non-Africans? Unpack that one for me.
This is a pretty common scam. If you google "cartel escort scam" you'll instances of it happening in Canada, the US, and the UK.
It's also branched out into just targeting random people as general extortion.
It's less common and it may not be that exact phrasing, but I heard that sentiment be murmured on the periphery of things.
The ban on non-Muslims from the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and the ban on non-Muslim prayer on the Temple Mount, are both reprehensible.
Why do you consider this reprehensible? Banning outsiders from sacred places used to be the norm. Mormons still do this for tabernacles after consecration, iirc
I backpack as a hobby. My packing list is a spreadsheet broken down into sections such as "worn clothing", "packed clothing", "shelter system", etc. Each line gets a function (shelter), a description (tent, tarp, bivy sack, etc), and a quantity (1x tent, 2x pairs of socks, etc). I think it would be neat to let the spreadsheet estimate a pack weight as well so I added another column for weight calculations. It also a little pie chart so I can see what sections of my pack are adding the most weight (food, clothing, whatever).
I have a second spreadsheet with the weights of various items I use but it's a little tedious to copy/paste the weight every time I want to generate a new packing list, especially since I like to swap out different pieces of kit to dial my pack in for various environments and seasons. I'm not much of a programmer so I'm wondering what the easiest way around this is. My first thought was to figure out how to create a drop-down menu for each cell with the item choices pre-loaded and have the spreadsheet call the appropriate weight. For example, for my "shelter" cell, I would create a drop-down that had my winter tent, my hammock, my bivy, etc and then the "weight" cell would auto-populated based on my selection. This seems like an inelegant solution that's going to require a lot of upkeep so I'm wondering if a simple data-base in something like OpenOffice Base or MS Access might be be more appropriate. From my amateur viewpoint it seems like the database might be more work upfront but would be less maintenance in terms of upkeep every time I add/remove a piece of kit from my stockpile. (I'm a bit of a gear-do, I'll admit). Or is it six of one, half-dozen of the other?
I have two going. First, Brian Jacques' Castaways of the Flying Dutchmen. I really enjoyed his Redwall tales as a child and wanted to see how this one stands up. The second is John Pomfret's The Beautiful Country and the Middle Kingdom: America and China, 1776 to the Present. Exactly as the title indicates, it traces US-Chinese relations from the founding of the US up to about 2016.
I'm not persuaded of the automatic moral duty of bystanders to intervene when one country consumes another any more than when one wild animal consumes another. In terms of international relations, the world is a jungle and jungle rules and ethics apply.
Here is where I have a little more sympathy for DeBoer's position. The US has been plenty glad to be a bystander in dozens of other bloody conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, so what makes Ukraine so special? Yarvin just seems agitated that his ideological opponents seem to be winning.
While you're at it charge their home country with every expenditure related to expelling and transporting them.
Let's set aside that many of these countries are already broke. How exactly would the UK extract these funds? I highly doubt any of these countries are going to agree to pay those costs.
The metric "walking time to the nearest supermarket" I'm sure correlates closely to rate of property crimes. Where I live, homeless encampments tend to spring up close to grocery stores. These things are related.
Maybe, but not nearly as strongly as you think. I live within walking distance (less than 15minutes) to two grocery store, both anchor stores to smaller shopping complexes. You can, if you so choose, walk through a park to get to each of them. Shit, there's even a liquor store next door to one. Never had to deal with homeless encampments, petty crime, any of that. Maybe you just live in a shitty area.
In all honesty, I feel like getting shit-faced with AOC would make for an interesting evening.
Fair!
More options
Context Copy link