jkf
13hr ago
One option then, is to hack federal law in order to go after the protestors
In this case it's not really even a hack -- "disrupting a place of worship" is black-letter FACE act AFAICT.
(or maybe you could say that the hack took place when that law was implemented, in that including places of worship was not the initial goal of the legislators -- but that seems neither here nor there)
I expect him to claim that he was there doing journalism, and as such not a part of the group disrupting things; a 1A vs 1A battle!
The truth of that claim will probably be more important than balancing the right to worship with the right to journalist, but I expect that is the issue.
More options
Context Copy link