jkf
11hr ago
It's a good point that "I don't know anyone who died of covid" is not the only part of their personal experience that people will use to form an opinion on its severity -- virtually everyone has had or been exposed to covid by now, and if their experience was that the disease itself was no big deal, it's hard to reconcile that with a large death toll.
Like -- I don't personally know anyone who's died of prostate cancer, but I do know lots of people who've died of other kinds of cancer, so I'm prepared to believe that prostate cancer is a serious problem. If my doctor had said to me five years ago "hey, you've got prostate cancer -- this is a big deal, you might die" and I just... ignored it and it went away with minimal symptoms, I'd be less inclined to think that prostate cancer is a serious thing.
jkf
12hr ago
The issue is that you are prioritizing problems that are arguably possible (well, one of them) but have never manifested in an even directionally similar way over one that just happened a few years ago, repercussions of which were quite severe and still being felt.
I resisted "millenarian cultist" analogies so as not to be uncharitable, but you didn't want to talk about Ford Pintos, so fuck it:
It's certainly possible that Jesus will descend and start casting the goats (that's you) into a lake of fire at any moment -- this is roughly the worst thing that could happen (for you); shouldn't you prioritize Christian worship more highly than (I assume) you do?
jkf
12hr ago
Fuckin Boomers man -- the "annual % change" on your link flips positive (slightly) in 2009, 15 years before 2024.
Fifteen years into the baby boom was 1960, by which time births were well off peak and on the decline:
jkf
13hr ago
Somebody on the Scott-post did cite a paper doing exactly that -- in fact they take it a step further and look exclusively at mortality among people involved with the hospital system (where testing was manditory) but without a positive covid test. (matched cohort, 2018 vs 2020)
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-025-21782-9
Your doubt appears misplaced:
Our results indicate that during the first pandemic wave and the ensuing months, the death rate of people who were free of COVID-19 in BC (i.e., always tested negative) more than tripled that of a matched pre-pandemic cohort. In absolute terms, the group with the largest increase consisted of those with cardiovascular disorders, but in relative terms, the largest increase occurred among people who were not only COVID-negative but also had no previously diagnosed NCD, signaling that some of them may represent incident cases that escalated to death before routine detection and treatment was provided. The spike in deaths among COVID-negative people seemed to coincide with the period of almost total health system shutdown for non-COVID-related complaints.
jkf
13hr ago
All of those sound bad, but also very speculative?
We have a recent worked example of what can happen with GoF (true regardless of the true origins of covid-19); shouldn't we prioritize making sure that doesn't happen again over "stop Skynet"/"Butlerian Jihad Now" type stuff?
It's like hearing that Ford Pintos can explode due to their fuel tank design and responding with "OMG, cars can explode! Terrorists might start planting car bombs, I should work on anti-terrorism!"
jkf
13hr ago
It's not a good idea to go off such n=1 anecdotes in general.
Certainly true -- I'd consider it n=2 now though! My lifestyle absolutely involves a lot less exposure to infectious diseases than yours, so I doubt that I'm like highly immune anymore -- but would expect severity to remain mild if I get it again.
How severe were your more recent infections?
Given Marohn's published views on stroad repair, I suspect he sees the Texas solution - use part of the right-of-way for a limited-access road and part for "frontage roads" (which are actually streets in Marohn's taxonomy) and only allow access between them every few miles
I wonder if Texas got this from Mexico? This is a common pattern in high-traffic areas down there, although IME the driving experience kind of sucks that may be more for Mexico reasons than a flaw with the concept.
The issue is mostly "how do you turn left (and/or cross over) without a bunch of traffic lights on the arterial"?
In Mexico they just... put a bunch of traffic lights on the arterial, with predictable impacts on congestion -- plus the added quirk that left turns are for some reason accomplished by pulling into the slip road to your right, waiting for a left-turn light, then turning left across both directional lanes on the arterial part (also the opposite slip road I guess).
It's kind of fun, but I don't really get it.
jkf
16hr ago
I'm still not 100% convinced that the antigenic imprinting thing didn't transpire with the vaccines -- I've had it exactly once, during the Omicron wave, and don't seem to get it anymore despite the odd known exposure. Which is stark contrast with my (largely rabid vaccine fan) coworkers, who seem to be down with it all winter and still complain about side effects from booster shots.
Granted it's not putting them in the hospital or anything, but they do seem to be uniformly pretty damn sick for several days everytime -- which is worse than my initial natural exposure. Unlikely to get a good study on it, but if anything it seems like kind of the opposite of herd immunity -- I always thought that this was one of the more plausible reasons not to take the vaccine, so I get a nice glow of smugness everytime somebody calls in saying "OMG I can't even move, see you next week".
jkf
1d ago
reports that a vaccine "merely" health risks to the recipient by 90%
Unfortunately we don't even really have enough evidence to quantify conclusively what the 'severity' benefit really was -- the initial trials were underpowered for anything to do with severity/death, and of course were terminated once the companies got their approval. (in that the control arm got real shots)
So there's no RCT to quantify this benefit, and the population-level studies are hopelessly muddled by a mixture of hard to correct for demographic confounders and sheer politics/CW. Plus all the different strains -- it's hard to say for sure, but seems clear that Omicron was very not-severe as compared to earlier strains -- so when a person got Covid is probably even more important than his vaccination status, severity-wise.
jkf
2d ago
Meanwhile the agent who did the shooting was hiding behind the barricade and probably not visible to most of the rioters.
The picture of the gun poking out from the doorway tells the tale of the discomfort with this shoot to me -- cops 'get away' with shooting people at times where there's at least a nominal case to be made for self-defence, and this is not that.
It just looks so chickenshit -- step out into the hallway, square up, present your weapon and say "stop or I'll shoot" and I don't think anyone's complaining if Babbit keeps trying to climb through the door (which she might have!) and gets the bullet.
Officer safety is a thing, but at least this much risk tolerance is expected of any beat cop confronting an aggressive individual -- however violent the riot may or may not have been, it was clearly not a warzone, and Byrd was not a soldier.
jkf
2d ago
it just decides "it'd be nice to have this setting" and just invents it out of thin air
I mean this happens to me a lot too -- I guess if the machines were actually good at coding this could be pretty awesome!
-"Grok, you are hallucinating again!"
-"Sorry boss; let me fork that project and code something up -- BRB."
jkf
2d ago
I don't think we have this kind of carp where I'm at, but there are lots of smaller ones around -- we fished for them as kids. (and were encouraged to bonk them on the head and throw them in the compost, so I guess they are also considered invasive?)
I don't recall them being bait sensitive in the least -- from what I recall the technique would be "chunk of hotdog on a treble hook, dangled just above bottom near some hiding place (usually a dock that we were standing on, but hey)".
The "hiding place" and "dangled just above bottom" bits might be trickier in a river -- I'd be surprised if casting a bobber set to whatever you figure the depth might be near/behind rocks/overhanging trees/snags didn't catch the odd fish though.
jkf
8d ago
This would work if you are planning to force everybody to ride with the robots -- in reality the ones who are causing most of the crashes are the least likely to adopt self-driving cars anytime soon; criminals and poor people. So rolling out (hypothetical) "average driver" safety-level FSD cars on an optional basis would replace the safer drivers (rich, sane people) with something somewhat worse, while leaving the ones actually causing the accidents still out there tooling around.
tl;dr -- for me to be interested, they need to be better than me -- I don't care if they are better than the average driver. The average driver is pretty bad.
jkf
8d ago
I'm saying that the truly "average driver" as reflected in accident statistics does not really exist -- the famous "paradox" about how 80% of people think they are better drivers than average is actually kind of true. There are a certain amount of really bad drivers out there, and quite a lot more who are pretty good -- and they would be scared shitless by driving with a robot who drove like them 80% of the time, but like a drunken maniac the other 20%. (which would be as safe as the "average driver", statistically)
IDK whether FSD is even that safe at the moment -- I don't think it's knowable right now due to lack of adoption and/or public testing. Seems worse to talk about than dancing angels to me, unless somebody wants to bring some stats -- but if you insist, wouldn't people be, like, using this in prod if that were the case?
As I recall Elon promised to FSD from San Francisco to NYC 5+ years ago -- why hasn't he done so by now?
jkf
8d ago
jkf
9d ago
Provably beating the average human, or even reaching the same level would be a huge milestone that Elon would be shouting from every roof.
And yet still insufficient -- the set of human drivers includes a lot of people who are drunk/stoned/distracted/angry at any given moment -- perhaps unsurprisingly, these people cause a lot of accidents, which brings the average performance down substantially.
All you need to do to be much safer than average is not do those things; for me to feel safe sleeping (for example) in a robot car, I'd want a couple std deviations better than human average at least. I imagine trucking companies feel the same way (maybe even less risk tolerant) -- particularly considering that with automated trucks they no longer have a human to throw under the bus when he does something dumb.
jkf
14d ago
It helps if you have a bookshelf like this:
(@MadMonzer as well -- the corporate drudges graphic designers were probably big Mac Users too!)
jkf
15d ago
You may not be old enough to pull this off, but you can always claim "I'm a Mac user, not a robot dammit" -- the ability to insert em dashes (along with other typographical flourishes) was kind of a big cleavage point between the creative different-thinkers and the sweaty geeks/corporate drones going back to the 80s.
This claim will be more credible if you format everything in Garamond Narrow.
jkf
19d ago
Maybe, I don't really know -- but that just kicks the cat down the road in that the only evidence for that is "Mark Carney says so"; Poillievre was talking just as tough as anybody else on Trump.
jkf
20d ago
"I am the only guy who can deal with Trump", confidently stated, just swung the Canadian election -- so I don't think it's necessarily plague related.
A pure article of faith, divorced from any call to action or doomsaying.
Isn't this just a fad? Fads are a thing.
jkf
21d ago
Seems like Yahoo's fact checking/editing department
I'm pretty sure that's not a thing -- it says at the bottom that the 'article' is reposted directly from "WhereIsTheBuzz.com" -- which looks about like what you'd expect. Highly unlikely that Yahoo is fact-checking anything; their role as a slop aggregator could use some more scrutiny I guess, but this article doesn't seem much different than their standard run of human slop to me.
jkf
21d ago
Not only that, but if you bring up the economic consequences of the response (which we are certainly feeling today), they just say "oh well, you can't blame <govt X> for that, everyone else did the same thing" -- like, yeah -- that's the whole point: EVERYONE IN THE GNWO TURNED INTO A BUNCH OF RETARDS AT THE DROP OF A HAT. Seems like something worth talking about, but I guess not.
jkf
23d ago
I think I agree -- if they'd kept up with the rural wing instead of going all-in on urban progressivism, gay/gun stuff, etc there might be a small niche for them. Very candidate dependent though.
jkf
23d ago
I think I see -- yes, that would be a good place to caulk. Reno guys around here typically come from the outside, I was confused.
You could test fit and get your shims (at least the bottom) figured out first I guess, but I think you'll have lots of time. Probably don't need any super high performance caulk in there -- you should use pretty good product for the outer bead, so that space will be dry and dark.
I'm not so sure on "jabs" -- AFAIK this is good idiomatic British English, but much less so in North America. It feels like the sudden memetic adoption (particularly on the part of medical authorities, which I'd expect to use more formal language as a rule) of this word here in particular has something more behind it than brevity.
"Shots" of course I buy -- "getting the dog his shots" is a fine thing to say; "getting the dog jabbed" would be very weird (in North America). Doubly so if the speaker were my veterinarian.
More options
Context Copy link