jkf
1d ago
Reads to me as even more slop infused than your own forays, which as you know I think are counter to the current official stance on LLM-posting -- my question as usual is: if bot-posts are officially not allowed, but nobody is ever willing to do anything about it, in what sense are they not allowed?
(I'm aware that you personally think that they should be allowed, but AFAIK this is not in fact the position of the mod-team as a whole; the law of the land so to speak?)
jkf
1d ago
That said, wasn't the whole HR-mandated woke stuff kind of exaggerated to begin with?
The Canadian NDP (fairly popular centre-left party) is literally handing out privilege cards to members of the oppression stack to determine the speaking order at their party convention -- the rankings on said stack being determined by a non-binary chairPERSON who scolds you if you call her MADAME chairperson. Nothing is over, it's just gone to ground. (in the US)
jkf
1d ago
Unironically -- woke-ism doesn't survive contact with the practical world, so teach them to grill, fix cars, build houses -- stuff like that.
Then there is no rule at all -- and the slop-lovers among us will continue to push the line until the forum is largely bots arguing with each other.
Bad way to go.
More options
Context Copy link