NYT has a quiz to distinguish human and AI writing. I did bad (3/5), but in my defense, I think most of the human examples are awful, making the quiz harder.
4/5 -- I will take up your defense in that Carl Sagan being indistinguishable from AI slop is not that surprising...
I'm somewhat shocked that 50% of the NYT-ariat don't recognize the passage from Blood Meridian, nvm are unable to distinguish -- blame English teachers for promoting trans-lesbo POC slop over great American novelists of the 20th century I suppose?
jkf
3d ago
We barely have an army in the first place -- and the constitutionality of separation has been mostly confirmed previously. (if you are Quebec)
jkf
6d ago
Doing easy things is not a good demonstration of military prowess -- that doesn't make the hard things smart to do, but it would be impressive if China could take territory from India. (preferrably without getting nuked, but AIUI there's not a real MAD situation in play with India -- so I'd still be impressed if the Chinese got their hair mussed a little)
Just that... it's a really popular book these days, and the prose is surely distinctive? Maybe people don't actually read it, IDK.
More options
Context Copy link