@kodomo's banner p

kodomo


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2026 May 21 08:56:51 UTC

Remember Reddit pre-2016?


				

User ID: 4389

kodomo


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2026 May 21 08:56:51 UTC

					

Remember Reddit pre-2016?


					

User ID: 4389

Anthropic destroyed millions of books, one of the greatest evils we can imagine

Who is "we"?

Destructively digitizing non-rare books is really "one of the greatest evils you can imagine"?

Please get a grip and some semblance of a sense of proportion.

Hyperbole does not help clarify anything.

Critical features of transistors are measured in nanometers.

Who is confused?

I really don't care about some person's made-up definition.

Nano-technology is technology at the nano-scale.

It did occur and the Japanese surrendered

Fish, meet water.

Transistors are nanotechnology, curently making people's lives better.

Taking a "nothing ever happens" stance in this day and age just reveals that you don't know what to do with the tools in front of you.

Reevaluate what you can creatively do with the device you carry in your pocket.

"Our model is so powerful that we are scared of releasing it" is a recurring marketing ploy that has been used since gpt-2

The key word in your example is "state-funded". That isn't rival institutional power, that is basic capital command-flow. Very few taxpayers are happy with carte-blanche funding of anything, and few legislators would risk their reputation in such a way. There are some basic parameters of public-interest (I understand that such a term can be twisted, but it remains there in a functional system) that require enforcement (very disrespectful to my imagined Fraud-punk religion where committing fraud is cool).

Much of the contention that morphs the state into a civic church is the morphing of the word "public-interest" to become anything you can imagine, so long as it is dressed in anti-discrimination language (see below for why).

Neoreactionaries have identified the modern civic-religion in the US as having been conceived with the Civil Rights Act which goes far-beyond state-funded entities:

State-sanctioned Racial-districting, private businesses can't freely associate if that includes turning away members of a specific race from their business, neighborhoods cannot limit who purchases homes in an area.

Basically it's the point at which the constitution morphs away from being a limiter on state-power. Now the state can enter and enforce its religion anywhere where a civil-rights grievance can be claimed.

In Europe, the encroachment is a bit more baked-in: For instance, Germany simply outlaws home-schooling outright. This is fairly insane from the perspective of an American: nobody is free to educate their child outside of the state.

Arguably the ability to educate your children away from state-propaganda is a God-given right.

In fact there is the case of a German homeschooling family (The Romeike family) obtaining deferred-status to stay in the US due to state-persecution in Germany. They were initially granted Asylum and then revoked by the Obama administration (An administration emblematic of upholding civic-religion).

The contrast between the traditional limited-government american legal view to grant asylum to such a family vs the civic-religion upholding Obama administration clarifies much: From the traditional american perspective, A victim of state-persecution is offered a lifeline by the US. From the perspective of the Obama administration, offering this family asylum validates apostasy from the German civic-religion which is disrespectful, being a fellow civic-religion.

As an example from my own experience, there is a niche of Youtube electrical engineering instruction that is largely dominated by English-speaking Indians.

I agree that since the Anglosphere has more of a culture of media-creation/video-creation, most of the well-produced, viral content will continue from here in the near-future.

Don't discount the effects of a changing passive audience: they determine what gets popular.

India currently has the largest YouTube Userbase with 518 million compared to the US's 259 million.

Africans, Indians, etc. are to normies what normies are to tech-nerds.

When people say "normie", they approximately mean "the masses of regular people in the Anglosphere" which is a global minority and techliterate (especially in English-first tech ecosystems) compared to the masses of people elsewhere.

The internet has formalized equality, so if a similar percentage of people in Africa and India join the internet as the US, then there will be many times more African and Indian users than native-English users.

East asians tend to have more-neotonous features than other races which adds fuel to the pedophilia hysteria.

There is still a puritanical element in the US that permeates all parties that manifests into such situations as:

-German tourists perplexed as to why their toddler is not allowed to be naked on the beach

-Men prosecuted for having pictures of themselves naked as child

The word is really losing its weight when every other Reddit thread includes some variant of the statement "This nation is run by (a) pedophile(s)". Big win for horseshoe theory when basic-bitch redditors are unironically using an Alex Jones talking-point.

An interesting edge case is that of fictional child porn such as hand-drawn pornography of various disney princesses and other underage cartoon characters. This apparently is mostly accepted, I guess?

Also there is the classic "1000-year-old in the body of a child" character.

Fucking hell, man.

Relevant life advice from Sam Hyde:

"If you ever catch the eye of a female cop: I hope you wore your bulletproof vest. I hope you have your vest on, man. I am praying for you, unironically. Because that gun on her waist at some point is going to accidentally go off. She's going to draw it out thinking it's a taser, she's going to have her finger on the trigger before she's ready to fire. Something you did made her feel threatened. You're taller than her, she feels threatened for her life. The only recouse she has physically is to shoot you."

My guess is that she passed through the police academy with lowered physical standards compared to her male counterparts. Fundamental negligence in governance.

The point isn't to make you laugh, it is to focus attention on various chronic absurdities

Don't stop there; the argument can be taken further:

"Sports are one of the few truly meritocratic domains, so if society were to become truly meritocratic it would have similar demographics as sports"

These things often function as a collective social "shit test" to see which men are willing to actually voice disagreement with patently absurd ideas.

It brings warmth to my heart to see people under the spell of the culture war pretend that Kimmel is funny because it deflates credibility and makes the whole premise so lame.

Although I have distaste for the "mediocre White guy with unearned success" rhetoric in most of its uses, he is kind of a good example of it which makes the fact that that side of the culture war is rallying behind him funnier.

Also he wore blackface, for whatever that means to anyone.

In the interest of balance I would say a similarly tasteless outgrowth of the culture war on the other side of the comedic divide is anything and everything surrounding KillTony

If you think bot accusations are bad now, imagine if the great firewall fell and 1 billion Chinese internet users suddenly inundated socials.

You mention how the barrier to entry corresponds to the degradation of the internet and I am reminded that someone pointed out that the popularization of "Dead Internet Theory" perfectly corresponds with the adoption of the internet by a huge number of Africans and Indians.

Part of the nature of libertarian wild west ethos is that it gravitates to places where there is no establishment yet. So don't waste your time in an established domain pining for the old days. Focus on new domains instead.

The US is obviously not a hold-out for freedom of information, as the USG would happily enforce IP law upon the world if it could (as orchestrated by the mouse). AI is a bit of a miracle in this regard because it came into existence faster than IP law could contain it.

Ironically the most "authoritarian" governements are some of the last bastions of hope for freedom in various fundamental domains: I'm thinking about the pricipled stand that Putin made with Snowden when a weaker country may have extradicted him (remember how few countries actually offered asylum to him (none in Europe btw)?), and China is really a darling when it comes to ignoring US ip law (ip law essentially being state-enforced artificial-scarcity on an inherently abundant medium), and it is former soviet territories that allow for true freedom of information via Anna's archive, Sci-hub, LibGen, etc.

The real libertarian frontier of AI is local open-weight models/paradigms(Hermes, OpenCode) which China is much more culturally-aligned with at the moment, at least for base models (I was about to say "GLM not withstanding" here until I checked and found out that Z.ai is indeed also a chinese company)

Many of these authoritarian policies emerging in California/Europe are partly an emulation of China. I have heard it said that China is the only government that took the internet seriously from its inception as a governed entity.

Even being somewhat libertatian-minded, I greatly admire the fact that Xi can label OnlyFans as socially-damaging "Western degeneracy" and wipe it in an instant from infecting China.

I tend to prefer using a decent LLM guide me through various textual analyses of literature that I have pulled from LibGen than have reddit-level arguments online. I think many young people are realizing that interactions with LLMs can often be more meaningful and healthier than an average interaction with strangers on any established forum in the World Wide Web.

Building data centers faster than anyone else in the US is "fake internet shit"? Why are Anthropic and Microsoft paying xAI a combined $2 billion per month for "fake internet shit"?

You really have trouble squaring Spaceflight and AI?

Do you also have trouble squaring Ecommerce and AWS for Amazon?

"Are they an ecommerce company or a web service provider?" No serious investor thinks this way.

Your incredulity inhibits your imagination.

You could point to any country that has run into hyperinflation so that all of its citizens become billionaires+. Talk to them about Zimbabweans in 2008: they were all billionaires! You could even get your hands on one of those billion-dollar zimbabwean notes and pass it around as a kind of "ethical immunity totem" as you discuss the issue.

They love saying that slogan because they have trained themselves online into rhetorically browbeating anyone who even slightly disagrees. Purity testing is a part of progressive (communist) culture.

It is a last-gasp of marxist zero-sum class warfare. If they they let go of Marxism, they really might have little else to add to the conversation.

What the fuck do people see in this shit?

They see alot of people select some generic useless model inappropriate to their usecase, fail, then condemn "AI" for their own ignorance.

It's all so tiresome.

It is preferrable not to lie

That comic could very well have the brain on a stick in both panels as none of the descriptors in the first are usually associated with anything other than the brain. Also, "hopes, dreams, and aspirations" are basically synonyms.

There is a point to be made that delving into the hypertransactional abyss in defining relationships wraps back around into meaningful compassionate connections when all factors are considered (e.g. A shareholder doesn't want Amazon to have a bad reputation, and a shareholder has a long-term perspective that would not encourage short-sighted "cost-savings")

Usually the zero-sum punchline of the "Sexual Empowerment" of women is the belittlement of male sexuality.

Let's take the Sexual Empowerment perspective and apply it to Male sexuality:

"Attraction to a woman's appearance regardless of her innerworkings is an undescriminating love of bodily-form akin to the unconditional love of Christ. Men love beautiful form regardless of what dwells within, opening themselves to become romantically-entangled with anytype of woman who attracts him in appearance."

And now for parody :

"It is a man's right to goon to anyone he wishes: Laws against public masturbation are a sexist anachronism meant to shame and restrict him while making women feel comfortable. The freedom of men is far more important than the comfort of women"

It's called having your cake and eating it too. It's tough for progressive comedy to emerge from the end of wokeness and actually allow raunchy humor.

In the context, it is quite funny without betraying the premise of wokeness, as the jokes are explicitly writen by the black comedian to make the white comedian uncomfortable and viceversa (and they don't see the jokes until they see them on the cue cards?) which is a funny premise in itself.

a white man saying the meanest, most racist shit.

This is too obtuse of a characterization, like saying that It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia is a show for Audiences to laugh at racist people who wear blackface.

via gemini:

colloquially known as the "Knight/Beast Complex" (or Saint/Brute) and the popular cultural idiom "Every woman wants a bad boy who is good only for her."

On the right, this is most frequently a “hot girl deficit”

As opposed to "famously hot" lefty women?

What a fantasy to tell yourself.

Hot people tend to be against equity and equal distribution and in favor of traditional "conservative" beauty standards.

Nobody knows what the Democrats are since they've been delaying internal change since 2016. Republicans happily let go of the Bushs in 2016, but Dems couldn't let go of the Clintons. Their nostalgia for the Clinton/Bush political dynasty-building paradigm has bizarre outcomes like outspoken Dem alignment with Liz Cheney of all people, plus, of course, the Biden Necromancy and prospective diversity hire dynasty (Biden > Harris > Walz)

I think they intuitively inderstand that their own party may well transform in a similar way as the Republican Party in 2016 and want to delay and delay to mitigate the deleterious effect of the transformation which will likely benefit them in medium run (while Republicans cling to the nostalgia of Trumpism). They will likely endure more losses in the mean time.