@looping's banner p

looping


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2026 June 11 23:35:15 UTC

				

User ID: 4444

looping


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2026 June 11 23:35:15 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 4444

Are you going to invest in Anthropic's purported $2T IPO?

Finding an open public restroom when you're on the verge of shitting your pants.

Thoughts on /r/overemployed? Working two remote jobs and getting two salaries seems too good to be true.

Has anyone here tried it, or know anyone who's done it?

A few close friends that live near major US cities do photography/videography as a side gig and seem to make decent money. As you'd expect, the pay range is fairly wide:

  • one friend who lives near NYC has approx. 5 years of semi-professional experience, and does shoots for established small businesses (real estate developers, restaurants, etc.) I think he charges several thousand dollars (no more than $10k) for a day of shooting + the editing afterwards. He seems to enjoy it.

  • another friend, near LA, with approx. 1.5 years of semi-pro experience, does smaller shoots - parties, graduations, maternity shoots - and I'd estimate that she charges around 500 bucks for an afternoon (usually something like 4 hours) + editing. For her, it's an enjoyable hobby that happens to make money. No plans to go full-time, as far as I know.

There's an up-front gear investment, and cameras can get expensive, but I'm sure there are entry-level options for less than $500.

Fun! Vibe coded game development has gotten better and better over the last few months. It sounds like you're fairly new to coding with AI (forgive me if I'm off the mark with that guess).

This article has a good showcase of what the top-tier model(s) from Anthropic/OpenAI can pull off: What it feels like to work with Mythos

In your case, I'd recommend just watching the video at the top of the blog post, with the following in mind:

All of these are one initial prompt in Claude Code where Fable had to take my vague prompts and generate something workable, followed by a couple of additional prompts with minor encouragement (“make it better”) or feedback. What makes these especially impressive is that Claude cannot generate images, so every piece of art or 3D object was made with math alone, not using any external assets.

With that out of the way; the free google models are a great starting point, and I'm sure you'll be impressed at how fast & precise the outputs are. That said, there's a significant difference in capabilities between the free versions of the models & the frontier (best at the time) versions, especially when you pair those frontier models with coding "agents" (software that allows for fast, targeted control of your personal machine).

For the time being, stick with the free models. Have fun, try crazy stuff, see what works & what doesn't. If you notice that the outputs aren't coming out how you'd hoped, sink a few hours into some youtube tutorials. I'm sure there are great independent creators, but there's just so much noise that I tend to just default to the easiest route - videos from the AI labs themselves. This one looks fine: Prompting 101: Code w/ Claude

You'll squeeze more juice out of the free models if you use the techniques described in the video, but eventually you'll get fed up with the mistakes that gemini is making. At that point, it's probably worth spending $20 to get a subscription to one of the top labs. I'm partial to anthropic & claude, but that's probably just because I use it so much through work.

Good luck!

Internet gym lingo. means you're at a height&weight where, in an imaginary violent confrontation, you'd have no chance of making it out in good shape (you'd be a victim of the violence).

Late to the party, but wanted to share a relevant essay written by Howard Marks, a well respected voice in the financial industry (cited by buffett, gurley, etc.) :

Is It a Bubble?

It was published in December, so some specifics are outdated (anthropic/openai valuations, etc.), but it's a comprehensive & thoughtful analysis.

It doesn't answer all the specific questions you asked, but you might find it useful & interesting. He's been writing for decades, so if you enjoy this piece, there's a deep archive to draw from.