netstack
Texas is freedom land
No bio...
User ID: 647
The U.S. military had (has??) great taste in coats.
Shout out to the Navy peacoats from the Korean War.
Come on, it should at least be one of the Reagan westerns.
My fiancee would say her liter canteen. She gets great mileage out of it.
Sloot, sarcasm is unbecoming.
@Quantumfreakonomics, that's not an excuse to start sneering...or to drag in other users.
@RococoBasilica, same goes for you, in turn.
I would take that bet if I could find any way to formalize it.
Immigrants Georg is an outlier who should not be counted.
Those import taxes were more like a combination of tariff policy and bailouts, propping up British tea and coffee growers using the American colonies. They were part of a broader pattern of extractive rule. Whether or not it was a good deal, British policy had a way of trampling the colonial ego.
I’m curious about those 1-2% numbers. Are they something like percent of household income? I think the impact was concentrated on shipping interests, which played a much larger part in the pre-industrial economy.
Do a partial exit strategy where you sell off any gains?
I’m saying this as someone who lacks such a hoard. I imagine I’d feel different in your position.
5% isn’t little. It’s 10x the prison population. It’s an entire state’s worth of taxpayers. Yeah, the IRS would lose its shit.
But that’s kind of beside the point. I really do believe there would be fewer and smaller protests if this wasn’t treated as a referendum on Donald Trump. People turn out to signal their tribal loyalty in a way they don’t do for abstract, bureaucratic causes. Every incident gets him a nice headline for his base and half a dozen headlines claiming he’s a fascist. That’s good for his personal brand, but it does nothing for effective governance.
Can’t speak for the OP, but this is more or less my position.
I would like government policy to align with its stated goals. I also prefer the stated goal, enforcing America’s borders, to most of the plausible alternatives. And I would most definitely like our law enforcement agencies to be “more lawful” in exercising their goals. Laws are what separate us from animals and dictators.
We ask the government to do all sorts of nasty things in service of a more perfect Union. Then we soften the blow by adding constraints. This turns imprisonment, conscription, taxation into routine and predictable processes. Border control ought to be routine and predictable, too.
Trump doesn’t play that game. Routines and constraints are means to an end. It makes him less effective, and it gives his enemies more ammunition. I wish he wouldn’t.
So I read Blade Itself and the follow up, but not the third book. The only bit I remember as a huge red flag was
If the criterion is leaving a lasting historical impression, then I don’t think most early Americans qualify. If it’s merely contributing, just about everybody is going to clear the bar. Any intermediate threshold is going to filter out descendants faster than immigrants.
I’ll admit I’m thinking about my dad’s side of the family. Where does ~300 years of subsistence farming put us? Plenty of 1800s or 1900s immigrants have contributed more to American culture, not to mention the economy. The wealthiest American immigrated in 2002. Does he get precedence?
The Democratic Party is setting up its own daytime TV arc. Oprah 2028!
In all seriousness, stuff like this is good evidence against larger-scale conspiracy theories. The establishment can’t even overcome this internal drama; it’s not going to do any better at playing kingmaker.
Okay, this is the second subthread today that makes me think about a certain scottpost.
Wanting to make history is not limited to narcissists. Every kid who thought about being an astronaut has been there. Trump just never had to give up the dream.
I don’t think this actually explains his attitude towards NATO, which is not a new obsession. He’s harped on it since the first term, but it’s always taken a backseat to domestic politics. So I guess I still prefer my model:
Trump makes brand decisions, not strategic ones.
That’s it. There’s no other criteria. Trump wants Greenland because superpowers do stuff like that. He dislikes NATO because he’s convinced it’s a bad deal.
He does not play the long game. He does not eat a loss. He does not implement a strategy. People come to him with proposals, and if they’re aligned with his brand, he gives them whatever they need. If not, he fires them. Trump I was ineffective because he didn’t have the roster depth needed to survive this style. After eight years of setting expectations, the current administration has much more momentum.
I’ve been thinking about regular credit scores a lot, recently. I am 100% willing to believe that lenders would love to expand it.
Who exactly do you have in mind?
Graft and identity-based handouts are still more likely, but that’s because they are definitionally cheaper than universal handouts.
Or the converse: AI gets just strong enough to keep the resulting bunch of purposeless, humiliated humans under control.
use those as an excuse to harass others while feeling morally superior in doing so.
Humans spending surplus time and money on social games is not the spiciest of takes.
use [political causes] as an excuse
Claiming that any specific cause is somehow insincere…that’s harder to swallow, especially if you aren’t even guessing at numbers. The epistemics are terrible; it’s an excuse to write off anything.
coffee hater
look inside
drinks cold brew
As the founding fathers intended.
Old World Blues is a Fallout mod for Hearts of Iron IV. Compared to the base game or many of its flagship mods, it’s more about diving into the setting.
My current playthrough is multiplayer with an old friend. He’s got a vault nation up in Colorado, stomping out the neighboring raiders and negotiating an alliance with the New California Republic. My faction, though, is a loose warlord state which trades off leadership according to regular wrestling matches. Its mutant luchadors are happy to lose gracefully and bide their time for the next match. In the meantime, they like to lead volunteer troops to other nations. This has been difficult, lately, since their closest neighbor is the Sinaloa cartel. After years of suffering raids, they’ve formed an alliance to wipe those bastards off the face of the planet.
I don’t believe any nation could quell revolt by appealing to food and fashion. Not without some clever metaphors!
You’re looking for something more civic-minded. Something like Washington’s Newburgh address. What an absolute legend.
Thing is, that’s not a speech to a mob. Rioters aren’t usually good listeners. Do you have any examples in mind?
Ha. We went in completely different directions with our answers, but yeah, I’d endorse this one.
- Prev
- Next

Is gold behaving more reasonably? Been looking at some rings and I’m wondering if this is the worst possible time.
More options
Context Copy link