@pm_me_passion's banner p

pm_me_passion

אֲנָשִׁים נֹשְׂאֵי מָגֵן וְחֶרֶב וְדֹרְכֵי קֶשֶׁת וּלְמוּדֵי מִלְחָמָה

0 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2022 September 05 06:00:05 UTC

				

User ID: 464

pm_me_passion

אֲנָשִׁים נֹשְׂאֵי מָגֵן וְחֶרֶב וְדֹרְכֵי קֶשֶׁת וּלְמוּדֵי מִלְחָמָה

0 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2022 September 05 06:00:05 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 464

What’s the deal with in-state vs. out-of-state tuition fees for US universities? I’m looking into getting my Master’s in… something STEMmy, possibly in the states, and I keep seeing these different rates. Why would an American not change their residence to whatever state the college is in, though? You could save tens, possibly over a hundred thousand dollars. What am I missing?

(It’s Sunday but the new thread isn’t up yet. I might post this question again in the new one if there’s no traction)

Ah, I see. Looks like they have their bases covered. Thank you!

Wait, is that legal? Can the mayor of a city just target a specific business on ideological grounds like that?

And yet there is no actual opposition to any actual Israeli action that they will not claim is motivated by antisemitism.

Look at it as shorthand. The full argument should involve the hyper-focus on Israel specifically, the framing in media, the barrage of propaganda and not-even-wrong takes that are levied against any Zionist in a left-aligned space etc. all originating from actual anti-Semites. It's not so much that the person objecting to whatever hates Jews, it's that his entire view is influenced by people who do.

That's not a motte and bailey, it's one argument. It's just longer than a sentence. The very reason we're having this discussion in the first place is anti-Semitism - but I'm not accusing you of being an anti-Semite, I'm accusing whoever is pumping out the anti-Israeli propaganda at the source - e.g. Al-Jazeera, BDS. The disinformation is so rife that it makes its way into the cultural "common knowledge" and extends the inferential distance between Zionists and anti-Zionists, until casual discussion is almost impossible. When every other sentence is either so incorrect that it can't be dismissed (not-even-wrong), or alternatively has enough truth in it that it's not literally wrong (motte and bailey), the discussion becomes like wading through quicksand.

Take the example you provided: "a country receiving billions in foreign aid from the US". Is that true? Well, there's an item in the Israeli budget for "bonds and grants from the US", and it's on the order of a few to some tens of millions of NIS. Here's the full budget, in Hebrew of course, and it's on pages 20, 60, 276. Those are Israel Bonds, so that's not from the US government. So where is all that American foreign aid? It's almost 4 billion in Military Aid. See here, from the US Congressional Research Service, table 2. This money goes back to the US, either in direct purchasing or in technology, such as Iron Dome tech which was recently moved to Raytheon's site for manufacturing.

Is this what is commonly referred to as "Foreign Aid"? Well, the US Congressional Research Service uses the term, so it's not wrong! But I also don't think that's what is implied by "a country receiving billions in foreign aid from the US". Just like "Rittenhouse killed people in Kenosha", "trans activists are influencing kids in schools", "reality is socially constructed" (a classic!), they're not wrong, but they're wrong. It takes immensely more effort to refute the claim than to make it, and even still anyone can keep claiming that Israel receives billions in foreign aid.

So it goes for every drive-by comment, backed by countless headlines, memes, tweets, all implying the same thing and creating a shared understanding that something is not right in Israel - wherever the hell that is, since most people can't point to it on a map, or realize how small the scale is. They're... something something oppression, something genocide, something US aid. Those poor Palestinians. Whatever, on to the next issue - I heard Lizzo twerked with some old guy's flute.

Track it back to the source and yes, you'll usually find actual, honest-to-god, Jews-hide-behind-the-bush-on-judgement-day, protocols-of-the-elders-of-Zion-believing anti-Semites. I don't call the people propagating the same info anti-Semites, but I do label the info itself an anti-Semitic attack. The people who believe they're informed, they're just the attack vector.

I wasn't taking a position on the "billions in foreign aid" line

Yes, and I didn't mean to imply that you are taking the position. It's a very illustrative example that you provided, and I was working off it. (perhaps too passionately, though)

Was it "The very reason we're having this discussion in the first place is anti-Semitism"? Because I'm talking about the exceptional focus on Israel coming directly from anti-Semites, leading to this very discussion.

Amusingly, you went right for the motte of your side while accusing the other side of standing in the bailey.

I don't see it. I'd love for you to expand on that, because it seems to me like my argument is pretty clear and bailey-less, as it were.

I’m not arguing the supposed motte at all. I’m only arguing what you labeled the bailey. I also don’t understand how one can fall back to the bailey, that’s the opposite direction from retreat.

I think the word you're looking for is "fixed".

What happens when the prices overlap? As in, I wouldn't want to sell at a price that's high enough to tax me out of my own home. This should be more common than not, since most people value their homes more than what they can sell them for - which is why they're not selling right now.

Come to think of it, everything you have should be worth more to you than what you could sell it for (counting transaction costs). That's why you bought and kept the thing for in the first place!

Can you name one such thing that can't be replaced by a good-enough reproduction if it were ever lost or broken?

Yes, location! This is what the entire point of land ownership is to begin with!

If I live in a neighborhood with a nice school, people I know, family nearby, close to my job, etc. then there's literally no way to reproduce it even with infinite money - unless everyone and everything moves to an exact replica in some other location, which requires moving the entire world, which is both impossible and makes buying my original home pointless.

Which Targaryen is race-bait casted?

Can you name one, please? I don’t recall any from the show, unless you count Daemon’s kids, which seems silly - their mom’s black.

I've seen experts forecast that they'll probably be able to develop what they need in 2-3 years.

If they still had access to the Semi tooling industry, then they’d be close to the design rules that other top-tier fabs (Samsung, tsmc, Intel sorta) are at now. They made huge leaps by stealing info, masks, and staff. Without that access to the tooling market, though, they’re dead in the water. If someone tells you that anyone can develop new Semi tooling in that kind of time frame, just stop reading.

This is a huge blow. I, for one, am cheering on the west to take lead again in this industry. I’ve been wishing it privately for a long time now, and I’m especially glad to stop selling to fascists.

Just FYI, that chart at the bottom only counts foundry revenue. Of the top three, Intel doesn’t do foundry, Samsung is both foundry and IDM, tsmc is foundry only - so no wonder the chart shows them “leading”. In total revenue all three should be roughly similar.

Those are Daemon’s kids, which I just mentioned. Their mom’s black.

tsmc doesn’t produce 60% of the world’s chips. They just make a lot of money from being the best design-rule foundry (along with Samsung). Most chips being produced use larger design rules, and are much cheaper. The other two companies that match them technologically don’t make their money from being a foundry.

You should be skeptical of narratives that make you feel good about yourself. I’m assuming here that you’re an “engineer”. In that case, your insight into the usefulness of the HR department is limited- in fact, the better they do their job, the less you should notice it.

That’s not to say HR are more valuable than the people who actually make and sell the product, but there’s a range between “most useful” to “bullshit job”, and IME HR doesn’t fall in the “bullshit” part of that range. In fact, I can’t think of any broad category of jobs that really are “bullshit” once you understand their function.

That's a fair point. I admit I have an axe to grind with HR and that's skewing my perceptions. It's useful for me to air it out and get some pushback--thank you.

That's big of you.

That said, can you describe what value HR brings to a company?

At its core, HR applies or enforces management's decisions regarding their employees. This is a very broad scope, and the exact borders change depending on the organization - smaller organizations will include payroll in HR, for example, while very big ones may separate even employee well-being to its own department. In most cases, though, they'll have to handle everything to do with e.g. promotion policy, PTO for individuals and for the entire org, hours worked (sometimes offloaded to payroll, which may be a separate entity), insurances & benefits (including negotiations with whoever supplies those, maybe annually), internal transfers according to company policy, and of course compliance with the law (i.e. external policy). HR is a bit like the police or the court system in that it actually makes sure that the decisions from higher up are carried out, as well as keeping track of those decisions. Otherwise management's decisions are meaningless, like an unenforced law.

For a small organization, you can get away with not having HR, or handing it all to one person such as the CFO. For a big organization, HR is essential, otherwise you get chaos.

For an example that I'm closely familiar with, if an employee wants to relocate from one branch of a large organization to another (this could be inside a country or even between countries), then the person who actually manages everything will be from HR. They'll take care of visas if needed (or hiring a law firm for it, much more likely), they'll make sure the employee gets whatever relocation bonuses they're do, they're in charge of the actual numbers f what those benefits are - all according to the policy that the company's management decided on. Or if your company offers tuition assistance, someone from HR will authorize it.

It's mostly bureaucracy, but I honestly can't see how an organization functions without it in any meaningful way.

Perhaps something like 1:25 or even more, since you get economies of scale as the number of employees grow.

Absolutely. I think for my local branch of a globe-spanning org, it's closer to 1:100. (I actually just went ahead and counted, and got to ~1:250, but I think I'm missing a few). Spit-balling, I'd say over 1:50 even is overkill.

Since ‘gender’ is not a term with a common definition, could you please explain what you mean by it?

To clarify, despite my dislike of the term, I don’t intend this as a jab. I really lost track of what people mean when they use it, so I’m unsure what you mean here.

So are you just asking “what is gender”? Or are you asking intentionally unclear questions?

I think you’re confusing “most people who enjoy gay fiction are women” with “most women enjoy gay fiction”. The former is likely, since there are many more women than gay men, the latter is untrue in my experience.

Hey, thanks for that. I liked going through the analysis.

Also, I found this pretty funny (hopefully the table looks alright):

EDIT: it doesn't look like anything!

It was one comment being "hell yeah dude" getting readability_qual = "college level"

The Manager’s Path: A Guide for Tech Leaders Navigating Growth and Change. It's a good book for engineering leads. It matches with a lot of stuff I've learned myself, plus has some thoughts I've evidently been avoiding all these years, because that's what former engineers usually do.

That sounds useful. Added to my audible list!

This basic scene plays out in some college every single weekend all over the world

I’m not so sure about that. I had no idea college dormitories in the US had a desk clerk, and I’m still not sure why they’re stopping drunk students from going to sleep in their own room.